Jump to content

Sawbonz

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    14996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Sawbonz

  1. Targeting children
  2. We’re already in Syria
  3. Why have a smart watch when you could have had a chip?
  4. Markets are up. Oil is down. Everybody is telling where/when they are going to drop bombs and launch missiles. This shit is kayfabe
  5. I think it was a pure power play and pretty brilliant. Goeber burned a lot of political capital getting that POS bill across the finish line and made a complete fool of himself at that press conference Abbott waited until the last minute and plunged the knife right in with the veto
  6. Show some compassion. He got left out of granddaddy’s will
  7. I feel like this tweet could apply to many situations
  8. It’s kind of only fair since we did the same
  9. My understanding was the DEA was involved, so the feds will probably destroy it but I think they still have a policy of not prosecuting
  10. Mike Johnson has repeatedly referred to himself as a “bible believing Christian” he believes in literal interpretations of genesis and revelation. Almost every time a reasonable republican legislator gets primaried it’s by someone with beliefs like him @Rex Kramer in terms of political influence, your congregation is becoming the fringe unfortunately, just like my middle of the road political stances became far left over the past 15 years.
  11. Look up Steve Witkoff
  12. Look into who wrote project 2025
  13. You’re thinking about Libyans and plutonium
  14. Tell me where Mike Huckabee is right now
  15. Wish in one hand shit in the other
  16. I’m going to neg every post this username is banned because you’re a troll who won’t go away but this is motto worthy
  17. I’m pretty sure the forces ready to obliterate OBL were ordered to stand down prior to his escape. Draw your own conclusions on why
  18. Of course, I haven’t read the paper either. From what I read, it doesn’t sound like he is drawing the conclusion that original intent was for white men only. That’s pretty much a given. My understanding is that he was using that as the premise to argue that our current and future policies should necessarily be structured to follow that original intent. In my opinion that is morally reprehensible, and regardless of the internal consistency of the paper would not be worthy of any type of award, although they might even earn an A for it. Of course, all the other papers could’ve been absolute dog shit.
  19. Well, since morality cannot be measured objectively, they could not be considered 100% “accurate“
  20. I categorically disagree if you are talking about a paper written in an academic setting whose basic premise and or conclusions are morally reprehensible
  21. So you’re saying he’s not wrong he’s just and asshole?
×
×
  • Create New...