Jump to content

Foosters

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    5461
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Foosters

  1. The real question is why you are supporting extrajudicial killings on US soil by foreign actors?
  2. The late Anthony Bourdain had a few thoughts on the man:
  3. As his proclivity to go on multi-day meth benders while bottoming for a strange men. But I'm sure his nationalist friends won't mind his brown skin and homosexual proclivities. The funny part is, as a heterosexual white man, I'll get to watch when they string him up while he shouts "but I'm on YOUR side!!"
  4. Amen. Does anyone know if Michigan losing helps or hurts us? TIA
  5. Did we all learn this phrase this week? I've seen it posted more in the last 24 hours than I've seen in my 20+ years on sports message boards.
  6. Someone should print out a copy of his letter and send it to him along with a version of this
  7. Don't knock it till you've tried it. Personally, a prefer a nice HFCS sandwich. Nice syrupy smack to each bite
  8. You people should try kicking the shit out of your dads more often
  9. Did it not occur to him to share this information with anyone when he previously coached there?
  10. Given all the laughter at aggy"s expense, we're probably less than 24 hours from an aggressive Looch article wherein he compares the hires of Elko and Sark and reaches the conclusion that objectively Elko is a much more justifiable hire, and any mocking you here coming from Austin is driven by fear and jealousy.
  11. I don't read that as the criteria being listed in order of importance, but it certainly does allow them room to decide that SOS is more important than H2H
  12. Wait, are you seeing this somewhere or is this just your opinion? Because that seems backwards. We go to things like SOS, comparable opponents, margin of victory, etc., when we DON'T have a H2H to determine who's better. Otherwise, you're arguing that the best way to determine who is a better team is not have the teams play, but to use other metrics. Or, similarly, the argument allows one to put forth that the winner of the NC game may not be the better team because the losing team had a harder SOS.
  13. I could see us jumping them IF we beat OSU by 24+ The reason being, it seems (by process of elimination) the committee valued Oregon's "dominance" during the mid-late part of the season, while Texas limped to W after W. If Texas boat races OSU, that will be 3 straight weeks to close out the season in which Texas looks elite. Using their own criteria (cited numerous times above) there would not be a single objective metric in which Oregon bests Texas, and Texas has put to bed whatever issues they had when they were squeaking out victories. That said, I don't see that as the likely outcome even if Texas blows out OSU.
  14. I knew he was going to be good, obviously. I didn't share that at the time because I don't like being seen as a know-it-all. But I knew
  15. I had a libertarian classmate in law school who argued (in class) that fire departments and all other public agencies should be subscription based as all taxation is theft. Looked him up the other day and he's assistant general counsel for the Texas Public Finance Authority where his 6 figure salary is covered by taxpayers.
  16. No, I don't know. That's why I'm asking you, the smug expert. But I do appreciate the insight that the myriad gun, safety, red flag laws, etc. that have been passed on the local and state levels in Democratic controlled regions, are just performative, and thus the Dems are equal to the GOP when it comes to addressing gun violence. Holy shit typing it out makes it seem even more insane than when you posted it
  17. Yes, having the members of this board perform one additional click of the mouse is "ignoring" the issue.
×
×
  • Create New...