Folks may not learn what they don’t want to know, but providing facts to support an argument is persuasive to serious people. For instance:
(The stats I posted are from the FBI).
https://www.fbi.gov/about/faqs/does-the-fbi-keep-statistics-on-criminal-offenses-committed-in-the-united-states
Given the rhetoric, that asylum seekers (who are erroneously called illegal immigrants) and undocumented immigrants (who are guilty of misdemeanors) are called violent, that cities are under attack, it is important to know the facts. In 2024, crime was at levels not seen since the 60s.
This is why many people view that rhetoric as racist.
https://popular.info/p/why-you-might-not-know-that-2024
In hindsight, Joe should have pulled a Lincoln. Suggesting so at the time brought admonitions of habeas corpus. If only we could have foreseen what was coming. Oh wait, we did see it coming.
Why not spend some money to fix the security issue? Those satellites have storm assessment capabilities other satellites lack. Seems like code ought be cheaper than new hardware.
One way to frame this situation is enough people have withdrawn their consent to be governed, according to our laws, and the lege needs to find a way forward without jack booted thugs, activist judges, and a power mad executive dictating to the people.
The government is refusing to recognize detainees’ civil rights. Habeas corpus goes back to the Magna Carta. Any thoughts, @sheeeit?
https://www.npr.org/2025/08/04/1256727547/1a-08-04-2025