Jump to content

4th and 5

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3435
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 4th and 5

  1. ARC ANGELS. Can't wait.
  2. I’m not a great big fat sweaty person but I think I could eat at Dan’s, Crown & Anchor and Dirty’s back to back to back.
  3. Interesting case, I had not heard about that one. The defense had a hell of an expert in Albert Rodriguez, he is a retired DPS commander, director for training, and is about as good as it gets for an expert in defensive use of force. He probably had a hand in training the Rangers who testified for the state.
  4. got one of these for Christmas, enjoying a delicious glass of iced tea right now, 5 stars
  5. I need another Mesquite/St. George trip this year, bad. And Scottsdale too.
  6. Hmmm.... Possession with Intent PG1 >4g for a bag of shrooms you and your boys collected from the pasture? Agg Assault FV on your old man because he deserved it for what he did to your mom? Burg Hab - felony other than theft, because you were drunk and the holed up resident needed an asskicking? Aggravated Sexual Assault for roofy-ing that little honey? Aggravated Robbery because you knocked down an elderly person wahooing some beer from HEB? am I getting close?
  7. A Picatinny rail mounted breathalyzer?
  8. Hat tip to @Mac8111, a shoreline he pointed out to me earlier this year paid off big on Wednesday afternoon and Thursday. We caught 13 keeper reds 22”-26” and 3 18” trout, wading knee deep with topwater lures. The fog was so thick at times you could barely see the end of your cast. And there were stingrays everywhere.
  9. Same % deal but glass lenses are more expensive
  10. Costa del Mar fanboys: Sunglass Hut has many models of Costa for 30% off ($189 x .7 = $132) If you buy one, you get 50% off the already 30% off price for all additional (not just one) glasses purchased I just bought 4 Brine green mirror/amber lens for me and my son for $132 + $66 + $66 + $66
  11. Resting for a bit on the smoker with the lid open
  12. Pitt paid Mr. Whipple $476,450 last year money whipping Marion may be easier said than done
  13. I blame Sark for this
  14. John was the BBQ savant. Troubled but none better. He knew me from Shaggy and always treated me like a VIP when I stopped by.
  15. Took a day off from a golf vacation in Sarasota yesterday to do some fishing. We couldn’t get out til 10 due to the fog, but when we did, it was on. We landed a dozen snook in 45 minutes then made a run out into the bay. We tried to pick up some mangroves for dinner, which we did, about a 10, but the jacks were ruthless. Every cast. Maybe 8 to 1. My elbow is sore AF. Then we went back into the river and did some more snooking, flipping freelined pilchards under docks and trying not to get broke off. Landed about a dozen more and called it a day by 2.
  16. THIS IS NICE 20 21 South Carolina 19 Commits 87.39 0 2 17 206.05 21 25 Oklahoma 12 Commits 90.65 0 6 6 202.72 22 23 Rutgers 18 Commits 87.29 0 4 13 202.25
  17. is Ewers' haircut worse than Nick Rose's?
  18. 18. the case of Idleman v. Pops
  19. It does if the cops charge you with Evading Detention or Arrest in a Motor Vehicle, which makes it a felony. This is a legal joke, but I know many ADAs would would try. Again the use of force or deadly force has to be justified to defend one's self, another, property, or make an arrest or prevent escape. Four justifications. We can eliminate property. As the dude is going away from the shooter or other cop, I see no justification for self or the other officer. So that leaves us with to arrest or prevent escape. The leading case is Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) which is used to claim that the use of deadly force against a fleeing suspect who has committed a felony was necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, which is essentially codified in all state penal codes to conform to the minimum standards in Garner to be constitutional. In Texas, that is Texas Penal Code 9.51. Below is Arizona's version - 13-410. Justification; use of deadly physical force in law enforcement C. The use of deadly force by a peace officer against another is justified pursuant to section 13-409 only when the peace officer reasonably believes that it is necessary: 1. To defend himself or a third person from what the peace officer reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force. 2. To effect an arrest or prevent the escape from custody of a person whom the peace officer reasonably believes: (a) Has committed, attempted to commit, is committing or is attempting to commit a felony involving the use or a threatened use of a deadly weapon. (here: felony aggravated assault of the employee or cop working security) (b) Is attempting to escape by use of a deadly weapon. (c) Through past or present conduct of the person which is known by the peace officer that the person is likely to endanger human life or inflict serious bodily injury to another unless apprehended without delay. (d) Is necessary to lawfully suppress a riot if the person or another person participating in the riot is armed with a deadly weapon. D. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, a peace officer is justified in threatening to use deadly physical force when and to the extent a reasonable officer believes it necessary to protect himself against another's potential use of physical force or deadly physical force.
  20. I'll just leave this here now, will look at later https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/police/general-orders/2000USE_OF_FORCE.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...