Jump to content

Foosters

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    5314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Foosters

  1. Please read pages 3-10. When done, I'd be interested to hear how that compares to Hillary's hypothetical statements that you assume are equal. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840.260.0.pdf
  2. If I were to show that a DA's office was rife with cronyism, favoritism, and nepotism; or that there were shady financial dealings happening within, should those individuals be appropriately punished? Or should any defendant who was prosecuted by a said employee have their convictions thrown out and be released from custody? Because I think we're inventing a new industry here. Forget challenging the conviction on its face. Just hire a private investigator, dig up dirt on the DA, and then allege that the impropriety should result in a reversal. As a defense attorney, I'm on board.
  3. You might be underthinking it. As a trial attorney, there are always a few things that the opposing counsel will go after if they apply to my witness: 1) Is witness being paid by the defense? 2) Does the witness have a prior crime of moral turpitude on their record? 3) Has the witness been caught lying on the stand? Of all 3, the last one is by far the worst. And usually that takes the form of showing, via circumstantial evidence, that something the witness said is untrue. Rarely, if ever, have I seen a witness take the stand with an actual conviction for perjury on their record. If you were a juror, why would you trust a single word that comes out of the mouth of someone who will have to admit that on a prior occasion, after taking an oath (exactly like the oath he just took in front of you), he intentionally lied on the stand? In fact, as a juror, you will be instructed by the judge that due to the witness's prior lies, you are free to disregard every single word that comes out of the their mouth.
  4. Um what are you doing promoting that account?
  5. Chainsaws and chainsaw training
  6. Ah yes, maybe facts will change his mind
  7. Ah, there he is Welcome back, Sack.
  8. Has anyone tried raking the plains?
  9. Anyone want to see a reality show where this guy and TTom share an apartment together and have to get jobs? Like The Real World but on amphetamines?
  10. Is there any evidence of this other than the existence of the law, which also impacts hundreds of other businesses? Is there even any evidence that he pushed for this carve-out at all?
  11. Ah, you're a betting man. Care to make a wager on this one?
  12. Think we figured it out guys. No increase in COL, housing prices are only high because people are greedy and want to live in mansions on Park Ave., and everything has remained about the same for the last 50 years. Gonna head over 6th Street Journal and let everyone know the good news.
  13. 7? Far more optimistic than me.
  14. Yeah, please retract your personal desire that Brooks not be drafted by the Cowboys. Just can't have that around here.
  15. We probably will get 15 3-stars on On3 after they drop them once they commit. Remember, you can only get an accurate assessment of our 2025 class if you take into account the development of blue chips under Charlie Strong in 2015.
  16. You know what, you're right. We need opposing viewpoints to balance things out. Opposing viewpoints like *checks notes Baselessly suggesting that a trans youth was killed because she probably was dropping n-bombs on Black people. Is that the kind of viewpoint variety that this place needs?
  17. But you just did it last week? Remember? You baselessly speculated that the trans youth in OK was attacked for yelling racial slurs. Then, when called on it, you disappeared. Remember?
  18. how did they find ways to undermine Trump's ban on Muslims entering the country the first time? Snuck through the border?
×
×
  • Create New...