Jump to content

Serak The Preparer

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Serak The Preparer

  1. You're thinking of @Rocko20. He now posts under his new sock of @Huckleberry.
  2. The other two gifs that I have never seen without chuckling at least a little are the cotton candy girl and the dog watching while the dog cake gets its head chopped off:
  3. Go back and read what you're responding to again. Running around calling people stupid and can't even fuckin' read.
  4. Has anyone supported property damage either? This is not rhetorical, I sure as shit haven't read all 100 pages, but I don't recall anyone saying "Fuck yeah, burn that building!". Certainly there's been view that it's not surprising, that it's a natural reaction to oppression, etc., and these views are certainly debatable, but that is different than support of property violence.
  5. Hey @Enchubben, just asking questions and all, but do you think the separating of illegal immigrant children from their parents started with Donald Trump? Several people answered you but I can't seem to find a response from you for some reason.
  6. Yes. It sounds like you don't, probably because you are misinformed. Let me ask you, do you think the separating of illegal immigrant children from their parents started with Donald Trump?
  7. She may have called him that night, but I don't think so. She delivered concession speech the next day. And to be clear, the vote was close and I see absolutely no fucking problem with her waiting till the next day, I just remember laughing when I saw Lobo pissed that she waited so long.
  8. Yeah, but as @Lobo pointed out, she didn't concede until lunch the next day. LUNCHTIME! The fucking nerve indeed. Oh well, guess it's time to vote for <checks notes> GOP Board of Education.
  9. Look, I'm fucking thrilled that Trump is getting his ass kicked, but will never say go OU. I hope Jayhawks sponteously transform into 85 Bears and whip some Sooner ass.
  10. You dumb shit, under the Electoral system, Texans have less say about who is their President than under a pure popular vote system. Due to weighting of votes for smaller states, they have more impact than populous states. If concern about other states picking your President is an issue, than why the fuck are you supporting Electoral College?
  11. No shit. Soon we're going to have socialized roads, socialized education, socialized fire protection, socialized police and socialized health care for old people. This country is doomed indeed.
  12. Don't flatter yourself. Stanco has you covered by a mile. But good news is you are catching up with Zork and Slorch!
  13. Not as much of a bourbon guy as many on here but have lined up some barrel-aged and imperial stouts ready that I've been saving. Not sure of order but will be an interesting night...
  14. Does not scan. Supposed to be 5 syllables, then 7, then 5 again. 2 / 10 awarded by the judge.
  15. I'm not a fan of the fat jokes and fuckability ratings that posters apply to any woman who is the subject of a post. That being said, if a woman describes herself as "kinda hot"... she ain't.
  16. There is a difference between "the majority of undecideds are simply ashamed Trump voters" and the "among undecided voters, those that have so far decided are switching to Trump more than Biden". You can certainly make an assumption that those which have broken towards Trump are representative of all undecided voters, but that is not clear from the data provided, agreed?
  17. I agree, but I am not sure what the point is. I'm a Man (/Gundy) so I am well familiar with the collapse of the Soviet Union. I am also familiar with the environment disasters in the US from mining, manufacturing, etc. No country / economy has EVER been good at capturing external cost. Now with EPA and other regulations, the US is closer to some degree, but I don't think socialism vs capitalism has anything to do with environmental disasters. This is not intended as a defense of capitalism or socialism, but it seemed like @Bozo_Casanova was implying that one was better than the other (in terms of capturing cost / economic disasters, not necessarily overall). If that is the case, I would again just try to understand what is meant by capitalism vs socialism, when every economy in the world is essentially a mix of the two.
  18. Wait wut? I agree that this is important but I have no idea what you are trying to say here. I <think> you are saying that the greatest environmental disasters have occurred under socialist regimes? What disasters are you thinking of? I mean, there's a lot, but is Bhopal greater than Love Canal? Chernobyl? Easter Island? And what socialist regime has ever existed that actually had everyone with equity in everything? How are you determine socialism vs capitalism given that no pure socialist or capitalist market has ever existed? I totally agree that owning means of production should incur full cost, but has that literally ever occurred?
  19. Strong disagreement. I think that dubious distinction goes to MNLonghornFUKM and it's not even particularly close.
  20. I don't know if it's just me, but this may be the calmest Lobo post I've ever seen. "Let's switch his caffeinated coffee with decaf and see if he notices".
  21. Hah, awesome. Tries to gotcha someone about an event that happened 2+ months ago. Fails. "Whatever guys, I don't have time for trying to gotcha people about an event that happened 2+ months ago".
  22. We need a "It's funny because it's true" rep.
×
×
  • Create New...