I'm positive you stole that from somewhere....but who cares, it's perfect.
Bingo. Modern American "Christianity" is primarily used as a shield from criticism of abhorrent beliefs.....that are actually directly at odds with what the Jesus of the Gospels actually preached.
And also bingo. There are many, many Christians who simply repeat the message of the Gospels (you know, the texts that actually make Christianity....Christianity): "When did we see you a stranger and invite you in?" “Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.” Fuck, even if they want to stick to the OT, Leviticus wasn't ambiguous: “When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not ill-treat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt." But....those aren't the people these Charlie Kirk Christians admire and idolize. Nope. They choose Charlie because he is DIFFERENT than the people who say those things.
Contrast with, apparently, America's most important Christian of the modern era:
This is not some side-issue for Charlie. It's not like "Charlie was a really good Christian, but he had a weakness for betting on the ponies, or he cussed a lot, or he loved the ladies, and stepped out on his wife." Nope. That's a CORE BELIEF for him, and for those who support him. They don't support Charlie in spite of that....they support him BECAUSE of it, while simultaneously saying that they love him because he was a good Christian. Who just happened to preach ideas that are unambiguously 180 degrees in perfect opposition to plainly stated Christian values and beliefs.