Jump to content

LCHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    3580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LCHorn

  1. You’re quite welcome to ignore it or try to make it better, kemosabe.
  2. I wouldn’t even consider at those prices, personally.
  3. I think basketball schedules are generally more flexible than football, but presumably the schedule is mostly set a year or two our and Beard’s preference for racking up wins against lower level completion was introduced during his tenure and continued by Terry.
  4. I would think the candidates running in 2026 have gotten the message and we‘ll see the election as a laboratory on what messaging seems to work best before 2028. It would also seem to me that the predominant sentiment here is “why are you even arguing about middle vs working class conflicts when the elites profit from that discord?” that’s mirroring some of what the primary candidates are exploring. My biggest concern is that the Democrats feel like everything is solved with smart policy and that’s either overly wishful or doesn’t resonate beyond a single election. It’s also one of the things that @Bozo_Casanova has repeated here and on other threads-we don’t have a great solution for the Jacob Savages of the world but it they will clearly vote against us if we paint them as racist asshole incels instead of admitting “yeah, you got a raw deal in some respects.”
  5. Who’s to blame for the schedule? Beard/CDC? I prefer Barnes “steel sharpens steel” approach…
  6. Hmmmmm…..
  7. You don't care about them getting fucked and said so, to wit @Brisketexan’s responses over the last few pages read a little like good Smeagal arguing with bad Gollum.
  8. This one was playing ahead of Avatar at the IMAX and looked amazing.
  9. I think this has been a good discussion, as several posters up thread pointed out (and nary a word about Trump, thank God for the respite). It's hard to have a good discussion without there being some provocation, and I'm appreciative of @Bozo_Casanova for being willing to take the live fire this weekend. I deleted something from my previous post in regards to your question about solutions because I didn't want to speak more for him than I already have (and you addressed the question to him), but I think just acknowledgment is kind of what the author is looking for. Yes, policies that lift everyone up and more correctly point the finger at entrenched interests and gatekeepers is the right prescription, but just acknowledging that there are losers in the effort for fairer representation seems a hard task for many people here.
  10. That's not what he does; the author is specifically attributing the result to white males a generation or two ahead of him in the career ladder, not the historically underrepresented groups who found themselves with improved employment opportunities.
  11. You and I both clearly feel the same on this, and I also think it's why @Bozo_Casanova is getting accused of being condescending. He is, in my opinion, condescending of a general "if THEY feel that way it's their own fucking problem" response that makes up a good number of the posts in the thread.
  12. Interesting this hasn't had a comment since September... Caught it just now at the Bullock IMAX--it's LONG. Amazing spectacle and no one does 3D like Cameron. It's worth the price of the admission in this venue but I'm not sure it's spectacular enough otherwise to warrant theatrical. I prefer the first two; better, more digestible screenplays.
  13. To be fair, I read his post with a general sense of incredulity, too, and it appears supported by data. Richard Reeves discusses this further on his substack That said, whether it's because of shitty parents, shitty values, systemic or policy choices, etc., their grievance is a problem politically and that's at the heart of the discussion.
  14. I'm less concerned with the plight of unemployed white male screenwriters, but I do think there's an increasing gender imbalance amongst college graduates that seems impolite to bring up in progressive circles, and it's a good example of a general blind spot amongst progressives when it comes to issues that don't fit conveniently within their historical promotion of civil rights.
  15. You think Sarkisian concerns himself with the opinions of the lunatics here?
  16. Its sports, you’re supposed to hit the media with a cliche and move on.
  17. Dammit, now I have to order one, too.
  18. On the one hand I understand your point, on the other I'm personally a little weary of this "what does the data show?" skepticism that has forced everyone to be mini-economists in order in order to justify "correct" beliefs and I think sometimes it gets in the way of having a north star politically. If you think there's electoral value in entirely de-legitimizing the author's complaint, be my guest. My concern is that this mentality is what led to Trump 2.0, and whether it's white males, the working class, or farmers who live in the dildo of consequences thread, I'd like the Democrats and progressives to not treat any group at least somewhat sympathetic as apostates.
  19. Forget the fact the author's choice of profession and personal weaknesses make him a poor representative of his own viewpoints--the issue that @Bozo_Casanova keeps raising is that HE believes it, and he's not a unicorn in his belief.
  20. I do wonder if the offense is starved a little on the NIL front because Sarkisian doesn’t trust Kwiatkowski to add much value in recruiting and they have to overpay to attract and retain players on that side of the field. Bobby and Gerry appear pretty adamant it’s entirely about the style of defense, fwiw.
  21. It wouldn’t be an outrageous expectation coming off the 2024 defensive performance, having junior coaches become desirable enough to get promotions, etc. Remember that a lot of football organization takes its cues from the military in a “you’re always training your replacement” culture and coordinators should be working to get their position coaches ready to be a coordinator, the head coach should be training the coordinators to be a head coach, etc.
  22. It’s good, you should read it. Moreover, anyone wanting to see the US dig itself out of the MAGA size hole in our electorate needs to better understand any group’s sense of disenfranchisement, whether or not you agree with its justification.
  23. I have a suspicion that this isn’t really about the 2025 season performance, it’s at least partially about the 2025 offseason when Sarkisian disappeared. It sounds like he trusted Kwiatkowski to handle some things, maybe hiring, maybe recruiting, and got let down.
  24. I just finished the article and want to let it stew a bit, but since I baited you into making the thread I'll chime in about this. My wife works for a FAANG firm and showed me pictures from the Christmas party from the firm's headquarters in California and there are virtually no white male faces in the pictures (old or young). I doubt it's because of DEI (it's preponderantly SE and E Asians that make up the attendees), but it does seem to align to an outcome that has the results described in the essay. That said, I think it's interesting that the author's seems to be overly focused on industries that are under a lot of employment stress to begin with. Education, journalism, and film and tv production have all had a rough decade. FWIW, the talk in film circles is that Sundance has gotten swallowed whole by the representation and identity focused programmers, and it's kinda ruined their ability to help promote indie films.
  25. This--I think posters are thinking it's 2015 rules.
×
×
  • Create New...