Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, satyanash said:

 

this is funny.  as if no case can be made that Texas is better than all 3?  

ND - common opponents, SOS, SOR, Top 15 wins

Miami - SOS, SOR, top 15 wins, (common opponent to Miami), unranked losses

OU - Top 15 wins, H2H(neutral site), SOS

and of course BYU has better SOS and SOR than both ND and Miami, no unranked losses

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, notre dame joe said:

We will have two top 25 wins and three more in the top 50.  All very decisive or a blowout. Is one 8 team really that much better than another?  Who cares

 

Who are the top 25 wins? USC and?

Posted
27 minutes ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

Texas should be in. It is a crime that we arent. The committee didnt have an ounce of courage. The 2023 committee wouldve had us in. They had guts. 

 

2023

ADs: Michigan, Navy, NC State, Kentucky, Utah, Miami (OH), K-State, 

Retired HCs: Nevada, Wake Forest, 3rd all-time winningest HBCU HC, 

Misc: All American O-lineman from Nebraska, Fortune 500 exec, national college sports journalist and professor

 

2025

ADs: Nebraska, Utah, current Arky AD (who was Houston’s AD when Texas hired Herman), former Arky AD from 2008-2017, Middle Tennessee St, Miami (OH), 

Retired HCs: Nevada, Michigan St, Oregon St, Virginia,

Misc: Ivan Maisel, All American TE at Ole Miss

 

I think I see the problem here 

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
4 hours ago, UTexasFight said:

2025

ADs: Nebraska, Utah, current Arky AD (who was Houston’s AD when Texas hired Herman), former Arky AD from 2008-2017, Middle Tennessee St, Miami (OH), 

Retired HCs: Nevada, Michigan St, Oregon St, Virginia,

Misc: Ivan Maisel, All American TE at Ole Miss

 

Why are Middle Tennessee State's AD, Miami of Ohio's AD, and Nevada's retired HC even in the room, let alone on the committee in a decision making capability?

Throw in Oregon State and that's 4/12 total positions and 33% of them are from schools that don't represent a P4 conference.

That's just objectively stupid. 

 

Posted

Tulane just clinched a bid by getting their first ranked win of the season over #24 North Texas, barely a Top 25 win for now, but North Texas will fall out of the next rankings. 

The only other ranked team they faced all season was Ole Miss who buttfucked them into oblivion 45-10.

Tulane also lost to 6-6 UTSA. 

What a stupid fucking system. 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, notre dame joe said:

Even if we look at just that metric in a vacuum; Miami beat who?  ND.

The entire SEC OOC? ND.  Maybe Georgia tech and Michigan.  But then maybe (we beat) USC, Navy, and Boise State.  

 

The entire point of a bloated playoff is to forgive losses from good teams, instead of having your national title hopes dashed by one loss and then later two losses.  Well, we have the best losses.

 

BYU has a better resume than yours by just about every metric and their lone loss is better than yours.

I noticed you seem to have abandoned the "ND is better than every other team in the cfp except Ohio State" delusion, though, so golf clap for that.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, notre dame joe said:

 

Navy is #22 on Colley.  Boise won't quite be top 25 but it's a win over a conference champ 9 win team. 

This is almost as bad as aggy trying to claim that beating a 7-5 LSU team is a big win.

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, notre dame joe said:

 

Navy is #22 on Colley.  Boise won't quite be top 25 but it's a win over a conference champ 9 win team. 

Colley also has Texas ranked behind UNT and Tulane. Like we wouldn’t skullfuck both of them. It’s a worthless “matrix”

Posted
4 hours ago, Pods said:

 

Why are Middle Tennessee State's AD, Miami of Ohio's AD, and Nevada's retired HC even in the room, let alone on the committee in a decision making capability?

Throw in Oregon State and that's 4/12 total positions and 33% of them are from schools that don't represent a P4 conference.

That's just objectively stupid. 

 

Sounds like in addition to joining the wrong conference and scheduling the wrong OOC games; y'all couldn't rig the jury?

Sum of all fears for a program that never has an advantage. 

Posted
7 hours ago, notre dame joe said:

 

Navy is #22 on Colley.  Boise won't quite be top 25 but it's a win over a conference champ 9 win team. 

The same rating that has North Texas at #13 and Texas at #21? Does it really track for you that Texas and Navy should be similarly ranked teams? I mean, look at this shit, it is absolute nonsense:

 team rating record SOS: rank top 25  

wins top 50  

wins best game

1. Ohio St 0.966931 12-0 0.544753: 45 3 4 W: #17 Michigan

2. Indiana 0.952599 12-0 0.528032: 58 2 5 W: #5 Oregon

3. BYU 0.922476 11-1 0.576222: 29 2 5 W: #14 Utah

4. Georgia 0.907745 11-1 0.559036: 36 2 4 W: #8 Mississippi

5. Oregon 0.896224 11-1 0.545594: 44 1 3 W: #16 USC

6. Texas A&M 0.882251 11-1 0.529293: 56 1 3 W: #10 Notre Dame

7. Oklahoma 0.878466 10-2 0.608210: 11 2 5 W: #9 Alabama

8. Mississippi 0.878307 11-1 0.524691: 59 2 3 W: #7 Oklahoma

9. Alabama 0.853778 10-2 0.579408: 23 2 5 W: #4 Georgia

10. Notre Dame 0.852777 10-2 0.578240: 24 2 5 W: #16 USC

11. Texas Tech 0.852184 11-1 0.494215: 88 2 3 W: #3 BYU

12. Miami (FL) 0.822636 10-2 0.543076: 47 2 4 W: #10 Notre Dame

13. North Texas 0.815733 11-1 0.451688: 106 1 1 W: #22 Navy

14. Utah 0.805918 10-2 0.523570: 62 0 1 W: #28 Arizona St

15. Vanderbilt 0.805220 10-2 0.522757: 63 0 3 W: #34 Tennessee

16. USC 0.804544 9-3 0.605301: 12 1 2 W: #17 Michigan

17. Michigan 0.801094 9-3 0.601277: 14 0 2 W: #33 Washington

18. Virginia 0.789173 10-2 0.504036: 80 0 2 W: #35 Louisville

19. James Madison 0.788659 11-1 0.420102: 117 0 1 W: #36 Old Dominion

20. Tulane 0.784777 10-2 0.498906: 84 0 3 W: #46 East Carolina

21. Texas 0.773722 9-3 0.569342: 31 3 3 W: #6 Texas A&M

22. Navy 0.760277 9-2 0.489418: 92 1 2 W: #25 South Florida

23. Arizona 0.740408 9-3 0.530476: 53 0 1 W: #28 Arizona St

24. Illinois 0.717287 8-4 0.586835: 20 1 2 W: #16 USC

25. South Florida 0.716153 9-3 0.502179: 81 1 2 W: #13 North Texas

26. Georgia Tech 0.714308 9-3 0.500027: 83 0 2 W: #40 Wake Forest

27. Houston 0.706716 9-3 0.491169: 90 1 2 W: #23 Arizona

28. Arizona St 0.703010 8-4 0.570179: 30 1 3 W: #11 Texas Tech

29. TCU 0.695792 8-4 0.561758: 34 0 2 W: #27 Houston

30. UNLV 0.688470 10-2 0.386549: 134 0 0 W: #55 Hawaii

31. Iowa St 0.687375 8-4 0.551938: 40 1 3 W: #23 Arizona

32. Iowa 0.683335 8-4 0.547224: 42 0 0 W: #51 Minnesota

33. Washington 0.682037 8-4 0.545710: 43 1 1 W: #24 Illinois

34. Tennessee 0.676912 8-4 0.539731: 48 0 0 W: #70 Kentucky

35. Louisville 0.670377 8-4 0.532107: 52 2 3 W: #12 Miami (FL)

36. Old Dominion 0.666249 9-3 0.443958: 107 0 0 W: #60 Troy

37. Missouri 0.661548 8-4 0.521806: 64 0 0 W: #72 Auburn

38. Pittsburgh 0.661194 8-4 0.521393: 65 0 2 W: #26 Georgia Tech

39. LSU 0.655328 7-5 0.597882: 16 0 0 W: #56 Clemson

40. Wake Forest 0.654649 8-4 0.513757: 75 1 3 W: #18 Virginia

41. NC State 0.654448 7-5 0.596856: 17 1 4 W: #18 Virginia

42. Kennesaw State 0.651044 9-3 0.426218: 114 0 0 W: #74 Missouri St

43. New Mexico 0.650783 9-3 0.425914: 115 0 2 W: #30 UNLV

44. SMU 0.647760 8-4 0.505720: 79 1 2 W: #12 Miami (FL)

45. Boise St 0.638219 8-4 0.494589: 87 0 2 W: #30 UNLV

46. East Carolina 0.637466 8-4 0.493710: 89 0 1 W: #49 Memphis

47. Duke 0.637324 7-5 0.576878: 28 0 2 W: #40 Wake Forest

48. San Diego St 0.630016 9-3 0.401685: 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...