Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. He edited it too. Maybe super secret second amendment?
  3. I just had a dream that I had somehow ended up with all of his properties and was in a board meeting of how to update them or ultimately get rid of them. I was finding every reference in the architecture or otherwise on the grounds to that traitor and having it removed. And then I was going to sell them off and have the proceeds go to various charities and institutions that actually do good things. National Parks Foundation, Cancer Society, homeless shelters, etc. And then I woke up. Back to your regularly scheduled nightmare we are all living in.
  4. Baker Mayfield and Kyler Murray are good QBs. Like 1/2 of NFL at minimum, upper 1/3rd easily. This board loves to shit on them for being UT mortal enemies and whatever, and I do too, but... they can ball.
  5. Occasionally the universe rights itself.
  6. What's weird to me is the shot itself. If Kirk is actually wearing hard body armor then it makes sense. Bullet clips the armor plate and then ricochets up into his neck. But it just really doesn't look like he's wearing any body armor at all. You can see the outline of his pecs and his nips. So if there's no body armor for the bullet to deflect from what happened? He didn't just get shot directly in the neck from the front. I doubt the entry wound would have been that big and there definitely would have been a gaping exit wound. So did the bullet hit this cross he was wearing? Seems odd a .30 cal bullet you'd normally use to kill deer would be stopped by something like that. Especially considering we don't see any wound/blood on his chest. When I first saw the video of the shooting, I immediately thought he'd been shot from behind. So there would be some small entry wound on the back of his neck and it forces his body to tense up like we see in the video, then the shirt billows out and the gaping exit wound appears on the front of his neck. This guy's video seems to suggest a bullet could have come from behind him. A bit morbid but he tries not to show the blood and whatnot. I'm also not claiming any crazy conspiracy theory like Israel killed him or the shooter was a patsy or anything like that. Just find the shot itself a bit odd.
  7. Absolutely impossible. I'm not sure how much of it is losing cognition, and how much is simply being realistic about my cognition... but I can't mentally multitask like that anymore. Only time I my head's free to absorb content mindlessly is walking the dog or riding a bike. Any other chore around the house and it's impossible to focus.
  8. I've successfully conditioned my spouse into being a misogynist bigot. We drove to the grocery store and spotted the neighbor's car, parked very poorly. I said, "hey look, the [jones] are here too, and they're really hugging the parking line" Her response: "it's probably the wife"
  9. Today
  10. Fuck yeah. I was thinking the same thing when my kid showed it me. And I'm agnostic.
  11. posting this for the opta champions league “odds”:
  12. This and the fact that the GOP spent all of 2020 saying the election was rigged. Now they’re in power and have the ability to actually rig elections. Even if there is concrete proof of a fix from the GOP, they’re gonna say that Dems are evil liars and are just gonna have to accept the loss the way the GOP did in 2020. The Dems will just sit back and take it. There won’t be a liberal J6. The inception of the country’s mind is nearly complete. We can’t win even if we really do have more votes. We are completely helpless to do anything about the situation we’re in. I imagine this is what it feels like for someone trapped in Scientology.
  13. They are getting the message. MGM has $2 ice cream at the pools now. Baby steps.
  14. If you look at the building where he took the shot, it is connected via a roof-top bridge to the UVU Computer Science building. Using Google Maps, you can see a stairway that gets you up on the roof-top bridge. The bridge appears to be at the same height as the roof where he took the shot. It's possible that he assembled the gun somewhere near the bridge, walked up the stairs and jumped on the roof, then moved to where he took the shot. It looks easy to get from the roof-top bridge area to the roof of the building where he took the shot. The NY Times has some pics and maps up that show a likely path: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/09/12/us/tyler-robinson-manhunt-timeline-kirk-suspect-caught.html
  15. True crime and politics. For the foreseeable future they will be less of an intersection than they are a roadway with two names.
  16. He stuck it in his pant leg and up into a backpack. He acted like he had a limp and limped all the way through a neighborhood, into the campus, into the building and up on the roof. There was a stairway that led directly onto the roof. The whole thing is caught on cameras. He climbs over this small wall next to the public roof area and hides for about 20 minutes where he assembles something with the gun, and then goes to his perch and makes the shot. Then he runs across the giant roof area to the corner farthest away from where Kirk was, throws the gun down to the grass, jumps down, and then walked over to a wooded area across the street where he dumped the gun. Since it was caught on cameras they immediately searched the wooded areas because they saw him walk in there. This video does a good walkthrough. The guy is a bit of a dildo but the walkthrough makes sense if you watch all the camera videos. For me, its very strange how easy it is to get up on the roof and get down from it. Its tailor made for a snipers position. Not a difficult maneuver and certainly wouldnt require a bunch of extensive training or anything. The main question for me is how he got the idea to use the roof. Could be as simple as he had been up there before and then heard where Kirk would be setting up and realized he could likely pull it off without having to do anything too complicated.
  17. Agreed. I do see that. I also see propaganda in a lot of coverage on other platforms. I try my best to weed through it. Basically our sort of motto is if someone has an exclusive interview then we watch it regardless of the platform. Bc it’s a piece of the puzzle. Or helps to shine light on one. Twitter going batshit over Candace Owen’s making that claim. This shit is just already weird and getting weirder, then you also have bots doing their bot shit. People making up shit. It’s getting to the point where I need like two back up sources for every one source. Even if a source or platform means well they could be spreading wrong shit. Common in all investigations but this is way worse bc of the politics and everyone wanting their to be a motive that works for their group, thankfully my private group doesn’t care about that, we just want the real answers realizing we may not get them at all. But in spite of that we aren’t going to fill the void if there are no answers just to satisfy a particular side or a belief. If we don’t get the answers so be it but we aren’t trying to create ones either.
  18. It was a complete mutilation of Second Amendment law. The government can only regulate speech, that is, impose consequences like expulsion from school, when that speech is in a very narrow category of criminal or illegal speech. Otherwise they have to leave us the fuck alone. It's not a matter of opinion.
  19. I don’t watch network news, but I do pay attention to a particular source’s credibility. Given the amount Fox paid to settle the suit against them, it is not a outfit I hold in esteem. But, sure, if it benefits the WH to have FOX report actual fact, then FOX will do so. Just keep this in mind, if the WH decides at any second after that report that some other narrative suits them more, then FOX will turn on a dime, and report the new talking points.
  20. Awww. I'm still on your mind. Bless your heart (or where it should be).
  21. Thanks, man! I've always wanted to see a rivalry like this, and I can't believe I finally get to see it.
  22. As a general proposition, most of us are looking at evidence and theories from an evidentiary standpoint: is it accurate, can it be proven, is it "corroborated."
  23. They have to charge a capital offense first. And doing so will be a stretch. This is the Utah homicide statute and it makes capital a number of forms of murder that probably wouldn't pass constitutional muster. https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title76/Chapter5/76-5-S202.html?v=C76-5-S202_2025050720250507 The only one factually even potentially applicable is the actor knowingly created a great risk of death to another individual other than the deceased individual and the actor;
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...