You are dubiously overreacting. It was a point, not directed at you specifically.
Perhaps it was using campaign funds in violation of federal election laws and tax evasion. Perhaps it was lying about it. Perhaps, it is suborning perjury. Or, maybe it's merely just the hypocrisy of it all. It's most certainly not as insignificant as you want to pretend it is.
Nope. Clinton Justice Department Memorandum dated October 16, 2000. "In 1973, the Department of Justice concluded that the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unduly interfere with the ability of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned duties, and would thus violate the constitutional separation of powers." "Balancing these competing concerns, we believe the better view is the one advanced by the Department in 1973: a sitting President is immune from indictment as well as from further criminal process." If you can cite regulations to the contrary, have at it.
Don't know how paper ballots got into this subject; however, you clearly have your agenda and opinions used to prop them up.
To pull this out of the ditch I will again recommend to anyone that's interested in the topic of impeachment to listen to the "Slow Burn" podcast. You'll enjoy it.