Jump to content

Pig Bellmont

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    7013
  • Joined

Everything posted by Pig Bellmont

  1. Isn’t porn illegal for children under 18 already? Look. We agree- it’s harmful to kids and there’s a law against it. This new law won’t achieve your stated policy goal, so I’m baffled why you’re defending it.
  2. Surprised we aren’t hearing a call to just enforce the laws on the books. “We don’t need new laws against access to guns child porn, we just need stricter enforcement”
  3. He’s supposedly a billionaire but got a bail bondsman. He buried his ex wife on a golf course for tax benefits. These are not actions of someone who has fuck you money
  4. What a great documentary.
  5. So to be clear, asking questions about whether quantifiable harms exist or whether this law is an adequate remedy is a full throated defense about access to porn? Or is it questioning the government’s motives in having access to private information that has you bothered? And nice deflecting to some bullying bullshit about my use of porn or my own sex life. I’m sorry you feel so insecure in your need to support the state government intrusion on not just parenting but all adults’ privacy online that you lash out at anyone who dares question such moral examples like Dan Patrick
  6. So do republicans want the government raising their kids for them or not? Bc I’ve been getting mixed signals. Oh and can someone point to how much porn is too much before it irrevocably damages our teens? All porn or only certain types (gay porn)? And what are the consequences that can be directly linked to exposure to porn? And who actually believes this law will have any effect on preventing people from accessing porn? Just be honest and tell us you think the government should have records of what certain people look at to get off, because it will help them prosecute the bad guys or whatever bullshit
  7. Why do they still have “twitter” instead of X everywhere? Because it looks like incompetence
  8. Any word whether his family was killed also? I’m guessing at a minimum his billions have already been recaptured
  9. Pig Bellmont

    High

    I’ve had something similar happen to me with homemade cookies but that’s bc the dosage wasn’t exactly scientific. Maybe the company that makes your edibles doesn’t have a good QC situation
  10. Except for the fact that the government already told her under seal about the conflict arising from the potential perjury before the DC grand jury. There’s no excuse for her falling victim to the Fox News “Doesn’t this seem improper?” trolling
  11. Minimum security prison is no picnic. The key is to kick someone’s ass on the first day
  12. lol more like: ”what are you in for?” ”See I was putting together a concert” *STAB* Although your idea of prison sounds nice. Like gangs with a sense of justice evaluating whether the victims deserved it, rather than a hierarchical system of violence and primal fear with some bribery thrown in for good measure
  13. Been to a lot of prisons, have you? And you think fraud gets respected generally as opposed to say armed robbery or murder?
  14. You’re right to be suspicious but I think Arch over Malik on the depth chart isn’t surprising
  15. Yeah I agree. That’s on the judge. How early did she/he give the Allen charge? For a criminal trial especially that seems brief I guess the jury notes were probably pretty definitive about a deadlock
  16. I’m watching it but I don’t find this season as compelling.
  17. Yes. He’s removing the ability to block accounts
×
×
  • Create New...