Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't think it's going to really hit me until we start to play a match and he's not there. Life can be so beautiful and so very cruel. I feel so terrible that his kids grow up without a father. I know the club will honor him well when the time is right.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, hobbes2702 said:

Petition to rename the thread 


dont know how to edit it but open to suggestions.
 

“#20 in memory of #20 Diogo Jota”

or something along those lines. 

  • blacklab changed the title to Liverpool FC 2025-26: #20 in memory of #20 Diogo Jota
Posted (edited)

The leverage play by Hughes/Edwards here is fascinating. If Isak is committed to a possible extension, then I see no reason for them to entertain us & they’d be fine to let us end up with Ekitike. If Isak is not committed long-term and has wandering eyes for clubs with larger ambitions, then I feel like the rational thing to do is sell Isak at his peak value now and then sign up Ekitike to a 6-7 year deal as his replacement? Isak’s value is only going to depreciate in the next 1-2 years as it comes due…

The only risk that we’re taking here is that Ekitike feels spurned that we’re clearly publicly announcing him as a second fiddle priority. But if it comes down to us vs. Newcastle for his signature, I’m hard-pressed to believe he wouldn’t want to sign up to play for the PL Champions as their first-team striker with Wirtz and Salah feeding him…the alternative is being second striker to Isak.

Edited by Bodowned

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...