Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Your mother never complained so long as I left a 20 on the nightstand
  3. I think they know who it was but it doesn’t fit the narrative they want pushed.
  4. If Vandy finishes off Cal (leads 2-0), the challenge will end in an 8-8 tie Texas, Bama, MSST and OU all had 5 set wins today
  5. Agree lol. I am just working my way through a valid investment thesis.
  6. Man, I bet this shooter sure feels stupid. He doesn't even get a blurb today, let alone a full news cycle.
  7. What does the military invading Utah like its 1857 do to BYU's chances this football season?
  8. lol literally took this picture today in Kihei
  9. several different types including public shootings, bar/club incidents, family annihilations, drive-by, workplace and those which defy description but with the established foundation definition being that they have a minimum of four victims shot, either injured or killed, not including any shooter who may also have been killed or injured in the incident. Why are GVA Mass Shooting numbers higher than some other sources? GVA uses a purely statistical threshold to define mass shooting based ONLY on the numeric value of 4 or more shot or killed, not including the shooter. GVA does not parse the definition to remove any subcategory of shooting. To that end we don’t exclude, set apart, caveat, or differentiate victims based upon the circumstances in which they were shot. GVA believes that equal importance is given to the counting of those injured as well as killed in a mass shooting incident. The FBI does not define Mass Shooting in any form. They do define Mass Murder but that includes all forms of weapon, not just guns. In that, the criteria are simple…if four or more people are shot or killed in a single incident, not including the shooter, that incident is categorized as a mass shooting based purely on that numerical threshold.
  10. a montreal road trip would be amazing
  11. Life is a matter of a half inch one way or the other for most of us.
  12. BLITZ ALL NIGHT Holy shit I’m in love …..
  13. Never let facts get in the way of a good narrative.
  14. It's a long season, but I think this Louisville team has the pieces to win a tough ACC. This could easily be a rematch late in the NCAA tournament.
  15. Whatever it was he shot the fuck out of him. Was no ear grazing or Connolly dinking.
  16. Well, I've got a good source that said "Charlie don't surf". Take it for what it's worth.
  17. That was a true gut check. Errors everywhere, but tough as nails late.
  18. Just like the Gary dig for a Stafford kill in the Stanford match. 2 “holy cow how did we score” points in 1 week to turn a 5th set around
  19. God damn, can some of y'all just give immamac a break for the night?
  20. Hook’em fuck yeah
  21. What a fucking win!
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...