Oh, and on the "release the Epstein files" as a whole picture, here's the facts and problems.
1) a NORMAL administration doesn't just "release investigative files." The documents, interviews, etc., were part of a criminal investigation. First, you don't release them while the investigation is ongoing (which is why there were several years when they were never going to be released). Then, even when the criminal investigation is over, they don't release documents that--while they may be embarrassing, or may even provide evidence that someone did something illegal--do NOT rise to the level of supporting an indictment. Not that I'm interested in morally cutting anyone any slack, but let's say there is a detailed log of everyone who ever flew on a plane with Jeffrey Epstein. That alone is NOT proof that every one of those people screwed underage girls, trafficked them, etc. Seriously, it's not a good idea to hang around a creep like Epstein at all, and I question your judgment if you do, but maybe y'all were just flying to go see a football game. He wasn't boning young girls 24/7, so merely having evidence that "person X spent time with Epstein" isn't going to support criminal charges, and the government isn't going to release it just to give the public fodder to say "oh yeah? Joe Schmoe was on Epstein's plane! KIDDIE DIDDLER!"
2) SO....in normal world, IF (big if, by the way) a full and thorough criminal investigation was conducted and everyone who merited being charged with a crime was indeed charged, then you'd know about the relevant evidence as it was introduced in their prosecution, and you would never know about the other evidence and documents that were NOT used in the prosecution. That's not sinister or secretive, it's how it works in ANY criminal matter. Could be a drug dealing prosecution, they aren't going to publish the names of every person in Danny Drug Dealer's phone contacts (FFS, he has the number of a great chinese delivery joint in there, because Danny digs him some kung pao).
3) but this isn't normal world. We had an administration and functionally all of its mouthpieces and functionaries a) actually campaign on "release the files!" and then b) when they took power, they made big shows of "here, I have a big white binder with a totally salacious list that the previous guys didn't want you to ever see - and I'm gonna show it to you!" That is outside of all of the norms and procedures and safeguards discussed in items 1 and 2 above.
4) so, here we are. Abnormal dipshits promised to reveal ALL THE STUFF.....that they now don't want to reveal. Maybe that's because there's no "there" there. Maybe it's because if they reveal it, their guy is going to look really, really bad (along with some other people). Maybe that's because someone grasped items 1 and 2 above, and realized that while there may be a lot of evidence of people who spent time with Epstein, that evidence doesn't rise to the level of supporting any criminal charges of kiddie diddling. But it would sure get tongues wagging. Or maybe it's some combination of all of those things.
What it boils down to is that the admin and its flunkies promised they'd do something, without ANY fucking idea what was actually there and how shit works. And now, they are stuck by their own stupidity.
As to kiddie diddling, I sure as shit don't have any "team." If there's a video of Bill Clinton screwing a 14 year old, prosecute the fuck out of him, I don't care. If there's the same for Trump, do the same. What I suspect is that there's a lot of stuff that's smoke, and would make a lot of powerful people look bad, but the evidence doesn't rise to the level of fire. And now, the idiot dog caught the car, and it turns out the car contains some stuff that will make the dog look bad too. So, what to do? Fuck 'em, they set a standard they can't now follow, and they're getting pilloried for it. Serves 'em right.
Oh, and was there likely, at some point or another, evidence to support greater charges/other prosecutions, but prosecutors engaged in a cover-up to protect some powerful people? I would be 100% unsurprised by that, in fact I would probably bet on it.