Jump to content

Longhornfan1024

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    2105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Longhornfan1024

  1. Can coronavirus be transmitted by sucking dick? If so, Putin might have it.
  2. What's considered a political post? Given that the government's (federal state) response to the virus goes hand in hand with the virus's extent and effect, it's virtually impossible to discuss the virus without discussing government action.
  3. I should have stuck with my original pick of Atletico beating Pool.
  4. I'll comment without using any names, since that's the rule. This is what happens when you put a dumb, corrupt asshole in charge of the country and a corrupt, cynical asshole in charge of the Senate. Neg me if you want, but human lives are at stake and they just don't give a shit.
  5. Pool finally gets their goal. Now let's see if Aleti opens it up and we get some more goals.
  6. Pool's gotta stop putting their shots directly at the keeper.
  7. They are doing this because there weren't actually any deliberations about how to address the virus. The meetings would have consisted of "we can't say that because it will upset Trump" and directives from the White House that "you have to minimize it and focus on the economy being strong."
  8. This is true. It's also true that it would be helpful to him if Bernie didn't keep labeling him as the establishment who wants to subvert the will of the people and hurt progressive causes. In an effort to bring undecided voters into his fold, Bernie is essentially reinforcing the worst of the instincts of his most ardent supporters and putting it into their minds that they can't vote for Biden in November. He can try to distinguish himself from Biden (it's not that difficult) while not torching the Democratic party in the process.
  9. I see that bt and the other bernie bros are already finding their excuse not to vote for Biden in the general. I guess M4A will be their single issue like abortion is for so much of the right. And they wonder why so many "centrists" claim that they are the flip side of the coin to Trumpers.
  10. Can someone clarify something for me? He keeps on talking about how they did a really good job and were on top of things because they stopped travel to and from certain parts of the world. I'm aware that the CDC has labeled certain countries, like China, level 2 or 3 for risk, which acts as advice not to travel to those destinations. But I'm not aware of an actual ban of travel by Americans to any countries because of COVID-19 concerns. Has an actual ban been put into place or is this Trump just being his usual stupid, lying self?
  11. Poors with their guns. I have robots with lasers attached to their arms, knees, shoulders, and eyes. Anyone tries to steal from my house and they get fucking disintegrated worse than if they had ebola.
  12. I mean, instead of beating around the bush just grow some balls and tell her "no, this is a fucking scam" in front of the lady's face.
  13. My high school used a 100 point scale for GPA. IIRC, they converted to a 4 point scale for college admissions.
  14. Congrats for the guy, but vodka is an awful liquor made for alcoholics who have no taste.
  15. Always the victim.
  16. I'm sure she reads this thread and your content is giving her the moral support she needs to continue.
  17. It's not what I don't get. It's what you don't get. I understood what you were trying to say. It just didn't make sense.
  18. Who is that dumbass and why do we care?
  19. You're dealing with workswithseed. It's a waste of time to try and find logic in his statement.
  20. Trump, Shumer, and Roberts can all be wrong here. Trump is wrong about just about everything he does and says, including his attacks on judges. Shumer shouldn't have threatened K and G. Roberts needs to understand that when he selectively shows outrage, he's hurting the legitimacy of the court as an apolitical body.
  21. If you're too dumb to understand the meaning of what you write, I can't help you there.
  22. Probably a good idea. I'm failing particularly hard at internet rule whatever: don't engage the troll.
  23. Through your first two sentences you are placing the Bork nomination and the Garland nomination in the same bucket of shit without providing any information regarding the scope of the bucket of shit or why each nomination process deserves to be in the bucket of shit. A person who understands what happened in both of those processes can reasonably respond by saying that the Bork process doesn't deserve to be placed in the bucket of shit whereas the Garland process does. That's what jimmy did, but you claim he made a strawman argument. You're now saying that your point was "politicization of the confirmation process is a multi-decade trend." That's a conclusion you're making without providing any reasoning other than, "well some people say that's a point that decline." When your writing is so unclear that you can't even articulate a reason that you came to a conclusion, you leave yourself open to any number of perfectly reasonable counter arguments to which you then respond "but I didn't say that."
  24. Or just stop believing in fairy tales.
  25. Preemptive attack by the aliens?
×
×
  • Create New...