Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Holy shit! Watching the news right now, and it is breaking that the grand jury returned a no true Bill in a DOJ redo trying to indict Leticia James.

Of course they will try again, but I think you can put a fork in the selective prosecution roast when they try again.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Holy shit! Watching the news right now, and it is breaking that the grand jury returned a no true Bill in a DOJ redo trying to indict Leticia James.

Of course they will try again, but I think you can put a fork in the selective prosecution roast when they try again.

I'm guessing the difference may be reviewing exculpatory evidence with the grand jury.

Or maybe they've been exposed to the shitshow.

Posted (edited)
On 11/24/2025 at 2:53 PM, The Dog said:

 


What a totally normal endorsement for degreed and licensed professions:
 

We believe the surgeon in this case, Lindsey Halligan, is not only extremely qualified…but she was in fact legally allowed to practice in the state….

 

We believe the bridge engineer in this case, Lindsey Halligan, is not only extremely qualified…but she was in fact legally licensed to design in the state….

 

Edited by Dnaguy
Posted
34 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Holy shit! Watching the news right now, and it is breaking that the grand jury returned a no true Bill in a DOJ redo trying to indict Leticia James.

Of course they will try again, but I think you can put a fork in the selective prosecution roast when they try again.

Inb4 the supreme Court rules "fuggit, dawg. Let em play"

Posted
1 hour ago, Captainant said:

Inb4 the supreme Court rules "fuggit, dawg. Let em play"

You mean the same peeps who said that the Texas gerrymandering was okey-doke?  

IMG_0405.gif.da5c33d862069f0afeebf145598f4116.gif

I read something the last month or so that said that the large increase in Hispanic voters for Trump was a part of the GOP calculation in gerrymandering, and that if the Hispanic percentage went back to Biden2020/Obama election numbers,  that the new gerrymandered districts will not be automatically a GOP win. 

Is there any truth to that, or somebody wish casting?

Posted
29 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

I read something the last month or so that said that the large increase in Hispanic voters for Trump was a part of the GOP calculation in gerrymandering, and that if the Hispanic percentage went back to Biden2020/Obama election numbers,  that the new gerrymandered districts will not be automatically a GOP win. 

No idea, but I would imagine that voting for the Leopards Eating Faces party and then discovering the leopards are eating their faces may make at least a decent percentage of them reconsider. 

I'm sure Miller has Trump convinced that all these people being deported were voting early and often for the Democrats.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

You mean the same peeps who said that the Texas gerrymandering was okey-doke?  

IMG_0405.gif.da5c33d862069f0afeebf145598f4116.gif

I read something the last month or so that said that the large increase in Hispanic voters for Trump was a part of the GOP calculation in gerrymandering, and that if the Hispanic percentage went back to Biden2020/Obama election numbers,  that the new gerrymandered districts will not be automatically a GOP win. 

Is there any truth to that, or somebody wish casting?

There was always going to be a degree of danger (whether the GOP recognized that or not). In order to create more GOP friendly districts, they had to gerrymandered a lot more of them even more tightly; making the margin for a win smaller than before.

So something like a 5 point swing statewide could give narrow margins wins to the Dems in districts the GOP was counting on threading the needle.

ie: their predictive math might be off. So, you know, expect a big push for voter suppression by the GOP if the worm turns this upcoming summer.

 

 

 

Edited by yoladu
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Holy shit! Watching the news right now, and it is breaking that the grand jury returned a no true Bill in a DOJ redo trying to indict Leticia James.

Of course they will try again, but I think you can put a fork in the selective prosecution roast when they try again.

Did Halligan present to the grand jury or did another DOJ official?

There is also the possibility that a more experienced and impartial AG lawyer did not put 100% effort into this. Anyone in any profession knows that they can perform the any job to a satisfactory level but not at a full effort. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Did Halligan present to the grand jury or did another DOJ official?

There is also the possibility that a more experienced and impartial AG lawyer did not put 100% effort into this. Anyone in any profession knows that they can perform the any job to a satisfactory level but not at a full effort. 

IMG_5565.thumb.png.cd68f30c50c689e67adf4160eae1d886.png

  • Haha 1
Posted

Trump just pardoned someone who brought an insane amount of illegal drugs to America. And he pardoned hundreds of people who spent the afternoon of 1/6 beating up cops who were trying to defend our Capitol. But here, by god, he's gonna get Leticia James for committing the crime of.... um.... well I think she bought a house. 

And this is still mostly being covered like it's a legit investigation. Which is just fucking crazy, but we don't really have journalists anymore I suppose. And a third of the country wouldn't listen anyway.

  • Hook 'Em 3


×
×
  • Create New...