Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, gurt said:

I might be in the minority but I don't really care if we lose Endries.  He's a poor blocker and a solid receiver.  Nothing about his skill set seems irreplaceable by what we currently have on the roster.

 

3 hours ago, Gidnik said:

he also had one catch for 50 yards.  other than that hes been a nil drain all year.  

 

3 hours ago, texifornia said:

To give Endries some credit, it felt like he was the primary victim of Arch throwing passes at open receivers' feet in the first half of the year.

Endries was open a ton underneath. Could have been highly productive. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
56 minutes ago, nycHorn said:


Let that soak in.

 

54 minutes ago, texifornia said:

The church itself is not going to do that. But there are plenty of rich Mormons that like football and like it as an advertisement for the church. Kind of like Notre Dame and Irish Catholic identity but a bit more officially organized.

I once knew the number two guy in Scientology. I’ve got a pretty cynical view of church money. 

I automatically assumed there were/are misappropriation of funds all the time through murky channels. 

But it get that those who don’t believe those types of things happen might think some of that money couldn’t make its way to famous athletes, people who might represent their religion well, and give those involved with the church a chance to hobnob with famous people. Ya, I’m sure that would never happen. 

image.gif.86d9495bffc3d9fbf0c03f9c39d56190.gif

Posted
1 hour ago, BurntOrange&White said:

 

 

Endries was open a ton underneath. Could have been highly productive. 

Yep, he was just straight up not looked at until Arch got more comfortable/Sark tweaked things.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Scholz said:

Treat it as an early spring scrimmage.  Nothing to get upset about.  It's meaningless.

it goes into the record books as a win or a loss, so in actuality it does mean something. 

i want to pass fucking notre dame in all time wins.  this would do it 

Edited by FORTY NINE TO ZERO
  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
3 minutes ago, FORTY NINE TO ZERO said:

it goes into the record books as a win or a loss, so in actuality it does mean something. 

i want to pass fucking notre dame in all time wins.  this would do it 

Would you rather have the most wins in ncaa history or the most titles in ncaa history?

Posted
17 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Yep, he was just straight up not looked at until Arch got more comfortable/Sark tweaked things.

And/or the OL could hold up for longer than 0.5 seconds

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Would you rather have the most wins in ncaa history or the most titles in ncaa history?

...both. Obviously. There's not much difference between playing to win and playing the players who will be important next year in this game with the opt-outs.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 hour ago, texifornia said:

...both. Obviously. There's not much difference between playing to win and playing the players who will be important next year in this game with the opt-outs.

Exactly

image.gif.2ac265fcd7345f67606f5168b05c2792.gif

Posted

Is sark going to keep fucking around and not go after anyone in the portal? It’s crazy all these players have entered and he hasn’t offered a single fucking one of them. Go figure….he’s probably thinking of his exit strategy for 30 days after cheezit bowl

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Is sark going to keep fucking around and not go after anyone in the portal? It’s crazy all these players have entered and he hasn’t offered a single fucking one of them. Go figure….he’s probably thinking of his exit strategy for 30 days after cheezit bowl

Is this a bit? The portal isn’t even open yet

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Is sark going to keep fucking around and not go after anyone in the portal? It’s crazy all these players have entered and he hasn’t offered a single fucking one of them. Go figure….he’s probably thinking of his exit strategy for 30 days after cheezit bowl

IMG_1862.thumb.png.769341057ed82467d9cf477e4eb1466a.png

  • Haha 2
Posted

As a staff we seem to lock up our priority guys in the portal fairly fast in past years. I'm confident there are a few conversations being had. 

Now, the bullshit that Flood has created ... tamper whatever, fix it. Ideally, we replace Flood and grab 2-3 starting quality OL. 

WR we recruited 3 or so 4/5* guys a year ago. They can't all be bad? If so, coaching issues.

RB - yep we need at least one. The Florida guy seems great for this. If we don't fix Flood's debacle at OL, this won't matter.

Posted
38 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Is sark going to keep fucking around and not go after anyone in the portal? It’s crazy all these players have entered and he hasn’t offered a single fucking one of them. Go figure….he’s probably thinking of his exit strategy for 30 days after cheezit bowl

Confused Trailer Park Boys GIF

Posted
10 hours ago, Newy25 said:


I want us to compete and play well on offense. Arch needs to look good because there’s no excuse there. Defense we are just going to have to understand it’s like a spring game there. 

 

10 hours ago, HtownHorn said:

It does help we are playing a 1980s offense. I am hoping Barnes has a big game.

Ian Boyd thinks with the loss of Lafau, Michigan is guaranteed to win the bowl game becuz UT is too inexperienced with remaining LBs on the roster. So I guess he's expecting for Michigan to run all over UT.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...