Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, dcar00 said:

we'd be at 8 at 9-2 with no tosu and pick a random mid level P4.

Without fOSU we would have stayed at 1 until UF and though that would have dropped us out of the top 10, it would not have dropped out of the rankings.  
 

and the refs probably got different instructions for the vandy game.   UGA game would have been a top 6 matchup and we are probably around 8-9 right now above all the teams we beat and a chance to move up as high as 5-6 by beating Aggies

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Lol what? We’d be top 10 easily. 9-2 OU, who we killed on a neutral field, is #8.

Don't lose to Florida

OU is 9-2 with better losses to us and Ole Miss. Funny you bring them up they scheduled and beat Michigan and are reaping the rewards. 

 

11 minutes ago, Jimbob said:

Without fOSU we would have stayed at 1 until UF and though that would have dropped us out of the top 10, it would not have dropped out of the rankings.  
 

and the refs probably got different instructions for the vandy game.   UGA game would have been a top 6 matchup and we are probably around 8-9 right now above all the teams we beat and a chance to move up as high as 5-6 by beating Aggies

Don't lose to Florida

Bama has a better resume and is currently #10 and will be the final at large at 10-2. They'd be in over Texas. 

IScreenshot_20251123_082609_Google.thumb.jpg.348d601329677aa85d3f70f8412df4f0.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Sir Ulrich said:

Don't lose to Florida

OU is 9-2 with better losses to us and Ole Miss. Funny you bring them up they scheduled and beat Michigan and are reaping the rewards. 

 

Don't lose to Florida

Bama has a better resume and is currently #10 and will be the final at large at 10-2. They'd be in over Texas. 

IScreenshot_20251123_082609_Google.thumb.jpg.348d601329677aa85d3f70f8412df4f0.jpg

#4 losing to #11 at home is going to drop further than 6 losing to 5 on the road.  

Posted

I see a bunch of pussies in here. Yall really Acting like Ohio State is the reason we’re in this position?!? 
 

please close the thread, this is embarrassing 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

It's the 3rd loss that has put us in the position regardless of who it was to.  the loss column rules all.

if our 3 losses were to OSU, Vandy, UGA we'd be in the same position.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
10 hours ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

We wont but we need to stop scheduling these. It will cost us a spot this year. It could cost us a spot in the future.

Our coach failing to prepare the team is what cost us a spot this year. Period. Schedule is irrelevant. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

It's the 3rd loss that has put us in the position regardless of who it was to.  the loss column rules all.

if our 3 losses were to OSU, Vandy, UGA we'd be in the same position.

If they actually cared about stuff like strength of schedule, non-conference scheduling and who you beat, OU wouldn’t be behind teams like Oregon and Texas Tech.

All the committee cares about is the number in the loss column. If you aren’t doing everything in your power in your scheduling to ensure that number can be as low as possible, you are putting your program at a disadvantage.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

If they actually cared about stuff like strength of schedule, non-conference scheduling and who you beat, OU wouldn’t be behind teams like Oregon and Texas Tech.

All the committee cares about is the number in the loss column. If you aren’t doing everything in your power in your scheduling to ensure that number can be as low as possible, you are putting your program at a disadvantage.

100% this. But idiots here will still ignore that fact and blame us because we had a trap game loss to Florida on the road where they played way over their heads in a "save the coach" game and we were still figuring out who we were. We lost, it happens, and that is the exact reason you should schedule cupcakes in the preseason, because if we did, we would be dancing right now with a win over aggy. 

Also, stop with the "we got destroyed by Georgia" BS. We were down 14-10 in the 4th quarter after one of the worst ref fuckings I have ever seen and yes they ran awat with it in the 4th but it was anything but a beatdown. We were competitive and the game couldve gone much differently if we didnt have drops and shitty calls all night leading into the 4th. 

31 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

It's the 3rd loss that has put us in the position regardless of who it was to.  the loss column rules all.

if our 3 losses were to OSU, Vandy, UGA we'd be in the same position.

Correct

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

Our coach failing to prepare the team is what cost us a spot this year. Period. Schedule is irrelevant. 

We demand our coach lead us to the playoff every year, then voluntarily make that path more difficult despite the fact the committee tells us all they care about is the number of losses. We played 5 top 10 teams this year, yet want to blame our playoff positioning on Florida, a team who led Georgia in the 4th quarter, and treat it as if we lost to some FCS opponent.

All this while we watch Texas Tech, Ole Miss, Oregon and Indiana play complete creampuffs out conference. We played more top 10 opponents than those 4 teams combined.

The double standard is insane. Texas is apparently required to win 3 games against top 10 opponents and not slip up in any other game in order to make the playoff, while other programs play 1 or 2 games a year they could realistically lose.

Edited by Hookem2147
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

We demand our coach lead us to the playoff every year, then voluntarily make that path more difficult despite the fact the committee tells us all they care about is the number of losses. We played 5 top 10 teams this year, yet want to blame our playoff positioning on Florida, a team who led Georgia in the 4th quarter, and treat it as if we lost to some FCS opponent.

All this while we watch Texas Tech, Ole Miss, Oregon and Indiana play complete creampuffs out conference. We played more top 10 opponents than those 4 teams combined.

The double standard is insane. Texas is apparently required to win 3 games against top 10 opponents and not slip up in any other game in order to make the playoff, while other programs play 1 or 2 games a year they could realistically lose.

Correct. The people acting like Florida is roadkill is laughable and they also forget that 2 of our 3 losses are going to end up being (after championship weekend) to the top 2 teams in the country on the road. OSU and UGA will end up 1 and 2. And then everyone will go, well if we didnt lose to that UF team on the road loaded with 5 star talent when we hadnt yet found ourselves then we wouldve been in. 

Not only that, we will have wins over 2 teams directly in the field and another just outside the field (Vandy). The system is super fucked up. We play the hardest schedule in the country and get no credit for it. @UGA and @OSU wouldve been losses for literally any team in the country (save Bama who has dark magic over UGA) and that needs to be factored in. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Hookem2147 said:

If they actually cared about stuff like strength of schedule, non-conference scheduling and who you beat, OU wouldn’t be behind teams like Oregon and Texas Tech.

All the committee cares about is the number in the loss column. If you aren’t doing everything in your power in your scheduling to ensure that number can be as low as possible, you are putting your program at a disadvantage.

yep.  SOS is about as important as maybe top 25 wins.  Tech is a perfect example as is Indiana.  All you need to do is notch one good top 10-20 win and your SOS doesn't matter. as long as you are in the 30's to 40's no one cares what your SOS is. if aggy had lost to ND, they'd still be #6 or higher because "you can only play the teams on your schedule".

the SOS, SOR, top 25 wins, home/away wins, etc is just to do tiebreakers for teams with the same number of losses.

last week the SEC and Big Ten teams were ranked in order of losses except for Texas Michigan which was at the very bottom and didn't really matter so it made them look like they were "thinking".

here is a funny thing, on sagarin aggy dropped their SOS from 14 to 19 playing something called Samford.  our SOS dropped from 9 to 14 for playing Arkansas.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

Our coach failing to prepare the team is what cost us a spot this year. Period. Schedule is irrelevant. 

schedule is relevant as it relates to playoffs, or so the committee tells us.

but your point on our coach is correct.  you can't lose 3 games and expect to be in and that is on the coach.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...