Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation


Hugo Stiglitz

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Maybe to trace down down the influence of the DNC and HRC campaign hiring a foreign spook to collect disinformation from russians, insert that disinformation into the FBI to influence their investigation activities, and seed crazy conspiracy theories intended to influence American politics? Are you serious?

Always Sunny Fx GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

It's amazing a series of posters that have been consistently and demonstrably wrong on just about everything feel the need to chime in yet again when an opportunity presents to clown themselves. 

What was Mueller's mandate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcat09 said:

Look, if you can't even grasp the basic purpose of a special counsel I don't know why you expect me to give any credence to your fantastical conspiracy theory.

My conspiracy theory?  LOL. Go home wildcat. I got receipts for basically everything I have said on this thread. Stop acting like a clown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anastasis said:

My conspiracy theory?  LOL. Go home wildcat. I got receipts for basically everything I have said on this thread. Stop acting like a clown. 

Why do you think a special counsel was needed to investigate Hillary's campaign and why do you think Mueller didn't do so?

I'm not asking hard questions here. I'm trying to establish some very basic foundational shit here and you either can't grasp it or can't admit that you got out over your skis and said some stupid shit. An honest person would own up to the mistake and possibly reconsider some of the thought process that led him to such a point. A coward would throw a hissy fit and attempt to redirect. Which did you do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Why do you think a special counsel was needed to investigate Hillary's campaign and why do you think Mueller didn't do so?

I'm not asking hard questions here. I'm trying to establish some very basic foundational shit here and you either can't grasp it or can't admit that you got out over your skis and said some stupid shit. An honest person would own up to the mistake and possibly reconsider some of the thought process that led him to such a point. A coward would throw a hissy fit and attempt to redirect. Which did you do?

Do you no think that an investigation into "Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election" should probe Russian disinformation intended to influence the Midyear Exam investigation?  Do you think that a fair and balanced investigation should probe Russian disinformation intended to influence the FBI, inserted by a foreign agent acting at the behest of the DNC/HRC campaign?

Of course you don't.  Jesus.  Try to be less of a fucking clown.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Do you no think that an investigation into "Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election" should probe Russian disinformation intended to influence the Midyear Exam investigation?  Do you think that a fair and balanced investigation should probe Russian disinformation intended to influence the FBI, inserted by a foreign agent acting at the behest of the DNC/HRC campaign?

Of course you don't.  Jesus.  Try to be less of a fucking clown.   

You really don't understand how far off into looney tunes land you are, do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

You really don't understand how far off into looney tunes land you are, do you?

If you read this thread and its predecessors from start to current day, and figure I am the one off in looney toons land, I am not really sure what to tell you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

LOL.  pretty weak fall back.  But my expectations for you were low at baseline. 

Sick burn, dude.  You are the master.

Maybe read what he's written tonight, then go back again and read for comprehension, maybe even a little between the lines, and then try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

Sick burn, dude.  You are the master.

Maybe read what he's written tonight, then go back again and read for comprehension, maybe even a little between the lines, and then try again.

Oh yes.  I must have missed the really intricate nuance of: 

28 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

You really don't understand how far off into looney tunes land you are, do you?

I mean, I can understand why you don't register yourself when looney tunes land is referenced.  Lack of self awareness and all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Sick burn, dude.  You are the master.

Maybe read what he's written tonight, then go back again and read for comprehension, maybe even a little between the lines, and then try again.

And I'd thought his "hearsay in a warrant application!!" was embarrassing. He went full TTom or CLH here tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcat09 said:

And I'd thought his "hearsay in a warrant application!!" was embarrassing. He went full TTom or CLH here tonight.

Pretty sure that you cannot quote me with that at all. I would speak of embarrassing, but know that you lack self awareness enough to land that plane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Disco Strangler said:

I chose to put one of the posters on this thread on ignore six months ago.  Now that I revisit this thread, I’m aware that this poster only really posts on THIS thread.  This website contains multiple sections and subsections, but well played, comrade.  

What poster is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Pretty sure that you cannot quote me with that at all. I would speak of embarrassing, but know that you lack self awareness enough to land that plane. 

Why do you think a special counsel was needed to investigate Hillary's campaign and why do you think Mueller didn't do so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Why do you think a special counsel was needed to investigate Hillary's campaign and why do you think Mueller didn't do so?

Do think that repeating posts from the last page, which you failed to respond directly to, is particularly compelling? OK. I mean if you insist. 

Do you no think that an investigation into "Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election" should probe Russian disinformation intended to influence the Midyear Exam investigation?  Do you think that a fair and balanced investigation should probe Russian disinformation intended to influence the FBI, inserted by a foreign agent acting at the behest of the DNC/HRC campaign?

Of course you don't.  Jesus.  Try to be less of a fucking clown.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Finally, we’re getting somewhere! I

I mean, I guess if you concede that the mueller investigation was never intended to uncover the truth of the situation.    

Edited by Anastasis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s just remember that the Mueller Report did reference the pee tapes.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-mueller-report-investigation-trump-release-live-20190418-story.html

On Oct. 30, 2016, the report says, Michael Cohen, a lawyer for Trump, received a text from a Russian businessman named Giorgi Rtskhiladze that said: “Stopped flow of tapes from Russia but not sure if there’s anything else.”[/Quote]

It’s totally normal for Presidents to have imprisoned lawyers who pay off porn stars on their behalf with campaign funds and text Russians about stopping flow of tapes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also went out of his way to point out that that doesn't mean there was no evidence of collusion or wrongdoing.

And that key witnesses did not cooperate and documents were not made available or were destroyed. Evidence from the report suggests witnesses were incented not to cooperate with inferred pardon from the President.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Anastasis said:

I mean, I guess if you concede that the mueller investigation was never intended to uncover the truth of the situation.    

Fuck man. I really thought you'd made some real progress. Bothsides disease has really done a number on you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Fuck man. I really thought you'd made some real progress. Bothsides disease has really done a number on you. 

Everything that I have mentioned over the last few pages is fully within the appropriate scope of an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Shit some of it in fact pivotal to the actual conduct of the investigation itself. You and I both know why Mueller didn't go there, and it had nothing to do with a restrictive charge.  He had very broad out in his charge. So you can bothsides quip me, and push back in whatever way you want.  No different than your continual push back on a whole series of issues that I have raised over the course of this thread, being justified in the end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Everything that I have mentioned over the last few pages is fully within the appropriate scope of an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Shit some of it in fact pivotal to the actual conduct of the investigation itself. You and I both know why Mueller didn't go there, and it had nothing to do with a restrictive charge.  He had very broad out in his charge. So you can bothsides quip me, and push back in whatever way you want.  No different than your continual push back on a whole series of issues that I have raised over the course of this thread, being justified in the end. 

Still a coward in the morning, I see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

It took this for you to know you should call a lawyer of law enforcement asks you a question?

FBI is way beyond the level of deputy Gomert.

3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

White privilege, man. It's a hell of a thing.

 No white man has ever been in jail while innocent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Still living up to low baseline expectations, I see. 

I'm honestly amazed that you still haven't figured out why the special counsel appointed to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump" as well as "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" did not conduct a "fair and balanced investigation" by investigating Hillary Clinton's campaign as well. I knew you were a disingenuous bothsides troll, but I thought you were smarter than this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

I'm honestly amazed that you still haven't figured out why the special counsel appointed to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump" as well as "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" did not conduct a "fair and balanced investigation" by investigating Hillary Clinton's campaign as well. I knew you were a disingenuous bothsides troll, but I thought you were smarter than this.

I know that you think that HRC-funded opposition research, consisting of disinformation from Russians collected by a foreign agent with ties to a Russian oligarch, inserted into the FBI to influence their election-related activities is not a relevant matter that may arise directly during the course of an investigation into Russian influence surrounding the 2016 election, and should not be pursued.

I also know that you think that Russian disinformation influencing the head of the FBI in his handling of the Mid Year Exam investigation is not relevant to Russian attempts to influence the 2016 election. But lots of words about the IRA, facebook memes, and jerkoff Jesus, that is totally on point and within scope.

You know exactly why these threads related to Russian influence on the election were not pulled on, and it because the FBI is in the middle of both with shit smeared on their face.  Mueller was a good company man. 

I mean I guess if your point in this little dust up is that the Mueller investigation was an inadequate examination of the circumstances surrounding attempts by Russians to influence the 2016 election, we are in agreement. I never really built him up as the superhero in the white hat, but I did think that he would do a better job.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

I know that you think that HRC-funded opposition research, consisting of disinformation from Russians collected by a foreign agent with ties to a Russian oligarch, inserted into the FBI to influence their election-related activities is not a relevant matter that may arise directly during the course of an investigation into Russian influence surrounding the 2016 election, and should not be pursued.

I also know that you think that Russian disinformation influencing the head of the FBI in his handling of the Mid Year Exam investigation is not relevant to Russian attempts to influence the 2016 election. But lots of words about the IRA, facebook memes, and jerkoff Jesus, that is totally on point and within scope.

You know exactly why these threads related to Russian influence on the election were not pulled on, and it because the FBI is in the middle of both with shit smeared on their face.  Mueller was a good company man. 

I mean I guess if your point in this little dust up is that the Mueller investigation was an inadequate examination of the circumstances surrounding attempts by Russians to influence the 2016 election, we are in agreement. I never really built him up as the superhero in the white hat, but I did think that he would do a better job.  

 

tim and eric mind blown GIF

You’ve done it!  You’ve actually put all the pieces together and proven both sides are actually the same. Congratulations! You are the chosen hero for this simulation and prophecy requires that you must now begin your training to unlock your full potential and join forces with trump and the q-tards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we wanna both sides it, it was Washington Free Beacon that had Fusion GPS start the research. Then HRC campaign hired Fusion after WFB stopped pursuing and GPS paid Steele to finish it for the campaign(the dossier).
 

Managed to TLDR and Both sides it in two sentences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, StassneyHorn said:

If we wanna both sides it, it was Washington Free Beacon that had Fusion GPS start the research. Then HRC campaign hired Fusion after WFB stopped pursuing and GPS paid Steele to finish it for the campaign(the dossier).
 

Managed to TLDR and Both sides it in two sentences.

This is basically correct, with the relevant additional point that the Russia Russia Russia focus of the Fusion work in general, and Steele's work in particular, only took off once the DNC/HRC got involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...