Jump to content
  • COVID-19 vaccine discussion


    Texas Jeff

    I thought it might be helpful to have a separate topic related to the vaccine.  If this is too much duplication, mods please delete this thread.  I thought it would be good to talk about who can get the vaccine, where they can get it, what side effects people are seeing, and in general what is going on with distribution.

    The CDC has published vaccine distribution guidelines, and if you care, they are worth reading.  They are dividing the timeline into:

    • Phase 1 - Potentially limited supply of COVID-19 vaccine doses available
    • Phase 2 - Large number of vaccine doses available
    • Phase 3 - Sufficient supply of vaccine doses for entire population

    Who you are will determine if you are eligible for a vaccine in the various phases.

    Phase 1 is divided into a Phase 1a and a Phase 1b:

    • Phase 1a - Mostly healthcare workers
    • Phase 1b - Other essential workers, people with higher risks, people over 65

    If you are eligible to get the vaccine and they have in in stock and you want to get it, it is important to go get it.  Both of the first two vaccines can spoil, so if a dose is sitting there and you aren't there to get it, they might have to throw it away.

    Both vaccines require two shots.  It is important to go get that second shot.

    Who fits in phase 1b and who has to wait until phase 2 might be a sticking point.  The "people in higher risks" category includes a lot of folks, maybe more than you would think might be in that category.  Hopefully we can quickly get to phase 2 so that we don't spend too long arguing about who is or is not in Phase 1b.

    Anyway, I'm interested in everyone's experience with the vaccine and especially getting the word out for those that can go get it, so that every dose ends up in an arm rather than in the trash.

     

     


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    49 minutes ago, Armybrat said:

    Pardon me for a brief threadjack, but what does this mean? (Colonoscopy result - I haven’t been to see my doctor yet):

    DIAGNOSIS:
    Transverse colon, polypectomy:
    -Low grade tubular adenoma.

    GROSS:
    Specimen labeled transverse colon polyp is a single 0.4 cm tan-red
    fragment. Entirely submitted in 1A.

     

    <<~~ no Dr/not medical advice/from the intertrons

     

     

    Adenomas: Two-thirds of colon polyps are the precancerous type, called adenomas. It can take seven to 10 or more years for an adenoma to evolve into cancer—if it ever does. Overall, only 5% of adenomas progress to cancer, but your individual risk is hard to predict

     

     

    Edited by Incredulity
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Hpara759 said:

    The wife has been hands on taking care of ICU COVID since March....every day she works ....12-13 hours a shift. Her co-workers (not all but most) have caught and recovered from it....not her, not one little symptom.... amazing!

     

    Oh the the obligatory pic of wife....

     

    Has she gotten an antibody test to see if she has had it? I feel like I and most of the nurses have likely gotten it but testing is only offered if we have had symptoms. We have had a couple of patients that have gotten COVID while hospitalized so even with us all wearing masks it is still being spread around. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, whithou said:

    Has she gotten an antibody test to see if she has had it? I feel like I and most of the nurses have likely gotten it but testing is only offered if we have had symptoms. We have had a couple of patients that have gotten COVID while hospitalized so even with us all wearing masks it is still being spread around. 

    In May she was tested for antibodies (neg)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We're fucked as a society because people won't take a fucking shot.

    Meh. More for me and my family then. If you’re too dumb to get this shot, you’re probably not somebody making a positive impact on society.
    • Hook 'Em 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My wife is a nurse and she's gonna get one, but she is also hesitant due to the sped up processes that this vaccine went through compared to others. It's a legitimate concern and to say otherwise is being naive. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/10/2020 at 12:26 PM, High Plains Drifter said:

     

    Calm down, its operation "Warp Speed" not operation "Ludicrous Speed"

     

    On 12/10/2020 at 12:46 PM, Cheeseweasel said:

    mel brooks GIF

    JUDLMYG.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I signed up to help administer the COVID vaccine to medical staff starting next week. Most of the ICU nurses that I work with have passed on getting it. I would have eagerly gotten it if it wasn't for a disqualifying factor (pregnancy). 
    I've seen some numbers. Austin metro hospitals have about 50% participation rate for this first go around. Higher in Austin proper, lower in the burbs.

    A lot of them are seemingly going to wait a few months before taking it but eventually plan to (this part is anecdotal not from data).
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, BradInATX said:

    I've seen some numbers. Austin metro hospitals have about 50% participation rate for this first go around. Higher in Austin proper, lower in the burbs.

    A lot of them are seemingly going to wait a few months before taking it but eventually plan to (this part is anecdotal not from data).

    My thoughts are that the trials started months ago. Any issues that take months to materialize will have already begun appearing in numbers. Any issues that take years to materialize, well a few more months won’t tell us shut about that. So the choice is get it ASAP or not get it at all. 
     

    certain population segments like pregnant or trying to get pregnant women may want to wait 10 months to see if there’s any fetal development issues. Maybe people afflicted with specific other issues, cancer or something, might wait. The fda eua may not even allow for delivery to those people, I don’t know. 
     

    but for our nuclear family, the choice is ASAP or never (I guess in theory if it’s still around and deadly years from now and the vax is as safe as any other, there’s a path of wait it out and eventually get it) and we have chosen to get it. 
     

    hopefully 30-50% of the pop elects to get it, and when demand drops then we open everything up and the virus makes it’s way quickly through the rest so that we end up at herd immunity before resistance fades. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, blacklab said:

    Have they added the autism causing part to the vaccine yet or are they going to release it with out it and add it in later?

    Guess Hollywood has to weigh in before that happens.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, blacklab said:

    Have they added the autism causing part to the vaccine yet or are they going to release it with out it and add it in later?

    We’ll have the ask the good doctor on this one...

    spacer.png

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/12/2020 at 7:54 AM, Armybrat said:

    Pardon me for a brief threadjack, but what does this mean? (Colonoscopy result - I haven’t been to see my doctor yet):

    DIAGNOSIS:
    Transverse colon, polypectomy:
    -Low grade tubular adenoma.

    GROSS:
    Specimen labeled transverse colon polyp is a single 0.4 cm tan-red
    fragment. Entirely submitted in 1A.

     

    Benign polyp removed. Return in 3-5 years for repeat colonoscopy. Although at your advanced age they may not bother to do another one.

    • Fuck You 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/11/2020 at 9:40 PM, Pato del Muerto said:

    Why are they passing?

    From what I'm seeing and hearing, there's skepticism around how quickly it's moved forward and the stronger reported side effects. 

    In an interesting twist, I think the fact that it's not mandated has opened people's minds to passing on it. "Why aren't they making us take it like the flu vaccine?"

    Because they're not 100% sure how things are going to work out.

    Also, there's concern about depleting the workforce initially. 4% of people get febrile reaction to first Pfizer shot, 16% do to the second. If you have a fever, you're not allowed in the hospital to work and it's the busiest time of the year for elective surgical work and their post op care.

    I'll be interested to hear how many tier 1 providers like ICU, ER, hospitalists etc take it. Right now it's a lot of surveys and people talking about it at work.

    • Fuck You 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/12/2020 at 9:31 AM, NorthLoop said:

    My wife is a nurse and she's gonna get one, but she is also hesitant due to the sped up processes that this vaccine went through compared to others. It's a legitimate concern and to say otherwise is being naive. 

    Agreed.  A pharmacist colleague of mine who runs vaccination clinics says he is waiting 6 months before deciding.  He says most of the MDs he works with are doing the same.  The relatively small sample size and compressed time frame make it tough to establish safety.  
    I am pretty sure I am going to get it, but I am nervous.  I don’t begrudge anyone who wants to wait.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

    From what I'm seeing and hearing, there's skepticism around how quickly it's moved forward and the stronger reported side effects. 

    In an interesting twist, I think the fact that it's not mandated has opened people's minds to passing on it. "Why aren't they making us take it like the flu vaccine?"

    Because they're not 100% sure how things are going to work out.

    Also, there's concern about depleting the workforce initially. 4% of people get febrile reaction to first Pfizer shot, 16% do to the second. If you have a fever, you're not allowed in the hospital to work and it's the busiest time of the year for elective surgical work and their post op care.

    I'll be interested to hear how many tier 1 providers like ICU, ER, hospitalists etc take it. Right now it's a lot of surveys and people talking about it at work.

    Is there a healthcare worker flu shot mandate?  It’s certainly not mandated for the general public. Few are, so a lack of mandate carries very little weight in my decision making. 
     

    however, a lukewarm reception from the healthcare profession could suppress the willingness of others to get it. 

    Edited by Pato del Muerto
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

    Is there a healthcare worker flu shot mandate?  It’s certainly not mandated for the general public. Few are, so a lack of mandate carries very little weight in my decision making. 
     

    however, a lukewarm reception from the healthcare profession could suppress the willingness of others to get it. 

    There will be a mandate for healthcare workers imo.

     

    Wife gets her vaccination from Texas Childrens on Friday (shes a nurse practitioner there). Meanwhile, ill prolly have to wait 3-4 months because our anesthesia group doesnt have as much buying power as the bigger hospitals/systems

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

    Is there a healthcare worker flu shot mandate?  It’s certainly not mandated for the general public. Few are, so a lack of mandate carries very little weight in my decision making. 
     

    however, a lukewarm reception from the healthcare profession could suppress the willingness of others to get it. 

     

    At most places the flu shot is required, but it's relatively easy to squirm out of it with an exemption if you know what to say.

    I don't think many decisions have been made as to whether or not to require the Covid vaccine at most major systems. 

    Edited by BradInATX
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, BradInATX said:

     

    At most places the flu shot is required, but it's relatively easy to squirm out of it with an exemption if you know what to say.

    I don't think many decisions have been made as to whether or not to require the Covid vaccine at most major systems. 

    I work in 3 different large hospital systems. None of them are requiring it.

    52 minutes ago, Druggist said:

    Agreed.  A pharmacist colleague of mine who runs vaccination clinics says he is waiting 6 months before deciding.  He says most of the MDs he works with are doing the same.  The relatively small sample size and compressed time frame make it tough to establish safety.  
    I am pretty sure I am going to get it, but I am nervous.  I don’t begrudge anyone who wants to wait.

    I think MDs that have been treating these people have seen that the vast majority of people hospitalized are either elderly or morbidly obese. They then are looking at themselves and determining if they’re really at risk of getting very sick with it. Then weighing if they’re Ok with the vaccine and side effects on the other side. 

    • Fuck You 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

    I work in 3 different large hospital systems. None of them are requiring it.

     

    That would support what I said then, would it not?

    Not deciding = not requiring it. There are conversations happening but as of now nobody has decided to require. Yet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agreed.  A pharmacist colleague of mine who runs vaccination clinics says he is waiting 6 months before deciding.  He says most of the MDs he works with are doing the same.  The relatively small sample size and compressed time frame make it tough to establish safety.  
    I am pretty sure I am going to get it, but I am nervous.  I don’t begrudge anyone who wants to wait.

    How do these people work in medicine? This technology has been worked on for ten years going back to SARS. The only part that was compressed was running stage trials in parallel. Major side effects would show within two months and we're past that for most participants. The vaccine is flushed from your body in weeks only leaving the immune response. Playing cards with my sister's kids.
    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, DaysOff said:


    How do these people work in medicine? This technology has been worked on for ten years going back to SARS. The only part that was compressed was running stage trials in parallel. Major side effects would show within two months and we're past that for most participants. The vaccine is flushed from your body in weeks only leaving the immune response. Playing cards with my sister's kids.

    THIS!

    I guess I didn’t realize how many cowards and dumbasses we have out there.

    My hospital system not requiring it.  But everyone I know is getting it and wants it.  Maybe because our hospital is up to it’s eyeballs with COVID.  

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, DaysOff said:


    How do these people work in medicine? This technology has been worked on for ten years going back to SARS. The only part that was compressed was running stage trials in parallel. Major side effects would show within two months and we're past that for most participants. The vaccine is flushed from your body in weeks only leaving the immune response. Playing cards with my sister's kids.

    And yet why have none of those vaccines ever seen the light of day?  Antibody immune enhancement has happened in *all* of the challenge studies.

    So yes the outcomes are known you will not be harmed by it and your body will have robust antibody production only one of the next several covid mutations is probably going to come be your grim reaper.  Have fun with that I ain't playing that game I'll rock on with my existing immune system and if it fails me then it was my time to go.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And yet why have none of those vaccines ever seen the light of day?  Antibody immune enhancement has happened in *all* of the challenge studies.
    So yes the outcomes are known you will not be harmed by it and your body will have robust antibody production only one of the next several covid mutations is probably going to come be your grim reaper.  Have fun with that I ain't playing that game I'll rock on with my existing immune system and if it fails me then it was my time to go.
    You should be required to wear a helmet when you leave your house
    • Hook 'Em 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, Pimphand said:

    And yet why have none of those vaccines ever seen the light of day?  Antibody immune enhancement has happened in *all* of the challenge studies.

    So yes the outcomes are known you will not be harmed by it and your body will have robust antibody production only one of the next several covid mutations is probably going to come be your grim reaper.  Have fun with that I ain't playing that game I'll rock on with my existing immune system and if it fails me then it was my time to go.

    frustrated billy madison GIF

    • Hook 'Em 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, BradInATX said:
    2 hours ago, Pimphand said:
    And yet why have none of those vaccines ever seen the light of day?  Antibody immune enhancement has happened in *all* of the challenge studies.
    So yes the outcomes are known you will not be harmed by it and your body will have robust antibody production only one of the next several covid mutations is probably going to come be your grim reaper.  Have fun with that I ain't playing that game I'll rock on with my existing immune system and if it fails me then it was my time to go.

    You should be required to wear a helmet when you leave your house

    And a halved, emptied cantaloupe over his groin just to ensure people know he's serious.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just because people work in healthcare (MDs, nurses, nurse practitioners, etc.) doesn't mean they all make logical, rational decisions about their own healthcare choices.

    The MDs that work in pharma R&D are all trying to get vaccinated as soon as possible, so if those MDs or nurses working in hospital systems don't want it, there are plenty of others willing to take their place in line.

    Edited by SizzleChest
    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All these people wanting to wait leads me to believe I can get this thing much quicker than March or April. Are they just going to let the vaccine go to waste waiting for someone who is “essential”? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, SizzleChest said:

    Just because people work in healthcare (MDs, nurses, nurse practitioners, etc.) doesn't mean they all make logical, rational decisions about their own healthcare choices.

    The MDs that work in pharma R&D are all trying to get vaccinated as soon as possible, so if those MDs or nurses working in hospital systems don't want it, there are plenty of others willing to take their place in line.

    They won't be able to get vaccinated in the next few weeks. There is only enough to vaccinate employees of hospitals. They are on 1A B, so the second set of the first group of eligible.

    16 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

    What’s gonna be fucked up is if we have a lot of vax waste because of the rigorous storage requirements. 

    If they hold up distribution because the elderly in nursing homes need custodial consent, we could easily have a big problem with spoilage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

    What’s gonna be fucked up is if we have a lot of vax waste because of the rigorous storage requirements. 

    I thought additional stability testing was proving storage conditions(temp) could be less and less extreme. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Bevo said:

    They won't be able to get vaccinated in the next few weeks. There is only enough to vaccinate employees of hospitals. They are on 1A B, so the second set of the first group of eligible.

    Rhetorical, Farley.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, SizzleChest said:

    Rhetorical, Farley.

    Yeah, but I am on the same fucking list and kind of annoyed. I am flying out on Dec. 23 with my wife who wants to see her mom and her sister. If we can't get vaccinated this week, it will be too late: It is already a little too late in that we would have to go without the booster.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

    What’s gonna be fucked up is if we have a lot of vax waste because of the rigorous storage requirements. 

    Having two doses per person should help with this, no? Order 1000 doses.. only 700 people get it. Order 400 more for the second batch of 700.

    Obviously oversimplified but it seems like it would help. I'm sure in most places they could also offer it to patients in the hospital or whatever. Probably 75% of hospital ER and OR patients have at least one comorbidity. Most of 'em got the beetus.

    Edited by BradInATX
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

    I thought additional stability testing was proving storage conditions(temp) could be less and less extreme. 

    Maybe, but anyone who has vaccine stored and will be at risk of it spoiling should (emphasis on should) have guidelines for who to call for re-distribution.  If cable TV companies can have a process to send you shipping boxes and supplies to return your equipment, there should be a mechanism for at-risk vaccine product to be picked up and re-distributed locally.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, SizzleChest said:

    Maybe, but anyone who has vaccine stored and will be at risk of it spoiling should (emphasis on should) have guidelines for who to call for re-distribution.  If cable TV companies can have a process to send you shipping boxes and supplies to return your equipment, there should be a mechanism for at-risk vaccine product to be picked up and re-distributed locally.

    I sure as shit hope that barring a really robust re-distribution plan, the general guideline is "well, if you're having a hard time storing it, make sure that shit gets into somebody's veins before it expires, even if it's the Amazon guy that shows up to deliver a package". But we're talking governments here, so that's unlikely.

    Edited by BradInATX
    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, BradInATX said:

    I sure as shit hope that barring a really robust re-distribution plan, the general guideline is "well, if you're having a hard time storing it, make sure that shit gets into somebody's veins before it expires, even if it's the Amazon guy that shows up to deliver a package". But we're talking governments here, so that's unlikely.

    Yeah, let's hope basic common sense exercised by well-intended humans outruns whatever bullshit corporations or governments impose.  Tall order, I know.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can’t wait to get it. I’ll feel like a man with super powers and a 12 inch dong. I’ll wear a giant name tag that reads “vaccinated” everywhere I go with a chin diaper mask just to meet the legal requirements. I’ll also book a few flights just for fun. I cannot wait for these shackles to come off, with one exception: I really don’t want to go back to the office. That’s going to suck.

    I’m middle aged and healthy, so I doubt I’ll get in the queue until this summer though. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/11/2020 at 6:40 AM, Heme Doc said:

     Also, who were the four “no” votes on the committee?  I’d like to kick them in the balls repeatedly.  
     

    One was a pediatric infectious disease specialist who voted 'No' because the paperwork because it is being recommended for 16 & 17 year old's, which in her expert opinion it should not be without further testing.   Hard to argue with that. 

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A pharmacist colleague of mine who runs vaccination clinics says he is waiting 6 months before deciding.  He says most of the MDs he works with are doing the same.


    I’m a MD and most of the physicians and nurses I know seem to want it. I don’t know who your pharmacist buddy is or where he practices or what types of MDs he hangs around, but I don’t think most MDs are planning to wait 6 months to decide. There have been countless surveys issued to healthcare workers in the past week so I’m not sure what the official data shows nationwide.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download

    The guidance for allergies is:

    Quote

    Do not be  administer Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals with known history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine

    And these are the components:

    Quote

    Each dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine contains

    • 30 mcg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2.

    Each dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine also includes the following ingredients:

    • lipids (0.43 mg (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate),
    • 0.05 mg 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]- N,N-ditetradecylacetamide,
    • 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and
    • 0.2 mg cholesterol),
    • 0.01 mg potassium chloride,
    • 0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate,
    • 0.36 mg sodium chloride,
    • 0.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and
    • 6 mg sucrose.

    The diluent (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP) contributes an additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.

     

    So remember kids, if you are allergic to something with  ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), this vaccine is not for you.

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think MDs that have been treating these people have seen that the vast majority of people hospitalized are either elderly or morbidly obese. They then are looking at themselves and determining if they’re really at risk of getting very sick with it. Then weighing if they’re Ok with the vaccine and side effects on the other side. 

    For many healthy people, the decision to get a vaccine holds a greater benefit to the population as a whole than it does to the individual. In some cases, the risk of contracting the actual disease or becoming severely ill from the disease may be relatively low, so the perceived risk/benefit of vaccination may not seem to be in the individual’s favor. This is a yearly problem with the flu vaccine.

    Even though I am young and healthy, I personally think the risks and the unknowns of the COVID vaccine are lower than the risks and the unknowns of COVID infection.

    Regardless, I am a physician who works directly with elderly and high risk patients on a daily basis, so the individual risk of vaccination is low enough for me than I am willing to accept that risk for the added protection of the patients I come in contact with. I would hope that most other healthcare providers would have a similar mindset for the sake of not only protecting our patients, but also leading the way towards vaccination of the greater population and eventually reaching heard immunity.
    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pardon me for a brief threadjack, but what does this mean? (Colonoscopy result - I haven’t been to see my doctor yet):
    DIAGNOSIS:
    Transverse colon, polypectomy:
    -Low grade tubular adenoma.
    GROSS:
    Specimen labeled transverse colon polyp is a single 0.4 cm tan-red
    fragment. Entirely submitted in 1A.
     

    giphy.gif
    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/12/2020 at 8:58 AM, Hpara759 said:

    The wife has been hands on taking care of ICU COVID since March....every day she works ....12-13 hours a shift. Her co-workers (not all but most) have caught and recovered from it....not her, not one little symptom.... amazing!

     

    Oh ... the obligatory pic of wife....

    1601673998196.jpg

    Exact same situation with my wife. Hasn’t brought it home to me either. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The potential side effects of the vaccine, flu like symptoms, seem to be scaring some off. I spoke with a friend that had covid symptoms for 3+ weeks, and he laughs at the idea of avoiding the vaccine because of the fear of a small chance of 1-2 days of feeling unwell.

    Personally I’m ok with uncertain people stepping out of the line to get the vaccine. Let’s allow people that really want it, to move up a spot(s). But I think the uncertain people should go to the back of the line. You refuse in December, your # will come up again much later next year.

    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...