-
Posts
20102 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Everything posted by Gil Bang
-
a real estate developer is fucking this up? who could have imagined that?
-
I felt the same way, but went on a Celebrity cruise and enjoyed it very much.
-
Thread's already derailed, so what the fuck... Guy I've recently become quite friendly with has lots of dough. He lives in FL. His daughter lives in the Bay area. She got married last year. He wrote a check for 250,000 for the wedding. Last year. A couple of months ago, she comes home early, and "husband" is balls-deep in a woman 15 years his senior...that he's been fucking for 9 years. Daughter loses her shit, of course. Daughter and Son in law were supposed to join by buddy and his wife on their European vacation, two weeks after she caught him. The wife comes alone and cries the entire time and ruins their vacation. To put the icing on the cake, buddy tells the daughter that when the vacation is over, he needs a week to catch up with work, then he'll fly out to SFO and go with her to meet with divorce lawyers. She sheepishly tells him that a lawyer won't be needed, as the wedding was just a ceremony/charade, and they didn't even have a marriage license. So my buddy pissed away a quarter million so his daughter could cosplay as a bride. He's livid.
-
It's not "certain Christians", it's the great majority of them.
-
Texas Football 2025 - Careening Towards the Abyss
Gil Bang replied to closetojumping's topic in Football
what the fuck? -
muchos gracias. And these fuckers were really solid.
-
austin to columbus, a party bus full of longhorns is gonna have a major "shitter's full" issue before it ever leaves the state of texas
-
nothing to see here. This is all above-board. Federal prosecutors on Wednesday moved to dismiss criminal charges against a woman accused of fraud in Florida who was being represented in court by Brad Bondi, the brother of Attorney General Pam Bondi. The Biden Justice Department filed a criminal complaint against Carolina Amesty, a former Republican lawmaker, in mid-January -- just days before President Donald Trump took office. Amesty faced two counts of theft of government property related to COVID relief fraud and, if convicted, faced a maximum penalty of up to 20 years in prison. But on Wednesday morning, Brad Bondi claimed in court papers that "counsel for Ms. Amesty learned [last month] that the government had ceased its criminal investigation ... and withdrew its outstanding subpoenas." "We understand that the government no longer plans to seek an indictment," wrote Brad Bondi, a lawyer at the firm Paul Hastings. Justice Department prosecutors followed up hours later, filing court papers asking the judge to dismiss the criminal complaint without prejudice. This favorable outcome for Amesty, who repeatedly accused the Biden administration of targeting her for political purposes, demonstrates a unique dynamic in the current justice system: in Brad Bondi, a defendant can hire a defense attorney with a familial relationship with the top law enforcement official in the country. A Justice Department spokesperson said that Pam Bondi's relationship with her brother had no bearing on the outcome of the case, telling ABC News in a statement: "This decision was made through proper channels and the Attorney General had no role in it." A spokesperson for Brad Bondi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The dropping of charges Wednesday was not the first legal victory Brad Bondi has scored during the Trump administration. He previously represented Trevor Milton, the disgraced Nikola founder who was sentenced to four years in prison for lying about the viability of his electric vehicle technology; Milton secured a pardon from President Trump in March. Amesty, according to the case docket, retained Brad Bondi in December -- about three weeks after Bondi's sister, Pam Bondi, was nominated by then-President-elect Trump to serve as his attorney general. In the intervening months, there have been multiple delays since the case was charged. The parties repeatedly informed the judge overseeing Amesty's case that they were "engaged in active discussions regarding the appropriate disposition of this matter," and repeatedly sought extensions to file an indictment. The first request noting these "active discussions" came two weeks after Trump took office in January. The judge granted those extensions. But in June, he only partially granted their request for an additional delay, writing in a terse order that "sufficient time has passed for the parties to work out their differences," and that their rationale "does not support tolling the deadline for more than 210 days." According to a filing from the government in July, Brad Bondi had provided them with "extensive" records of alleged exculpatory evidence, including over 500 pages of documents and "multiple in-person meetings and phone calls." The government continued to inform the court that their "investigation remains ongoing, due in part to a pending sealed motion related to grand jury proceedings." MORE: AG Bondi faces heat from White House, Trump allies over Epstein files release Throughout the protracted legal wrangling over the deadline to file a complaint, Amesty's legal team, led by Brad Bondi, repeatedly characterized the case as a "hastily-filed and politically motivated complaint" targeting his client. "Ms. Amesty is innocent," one filing stated, claiming the loans in question "were obtained appropriately in good faith and with no misrepresentations."
-
haha fuck you Bundy you cunt Anti-government activist and former Idaho gubernatorial candidate Ammon Bundy cannot discharge a $52 million civil court judgment through declaring bankruptcy. Judge William Thurman, a federal bankruptcy judge in Utah, ruled against Bundy late Tuesday afternoon, siding with St. Luke’s Health System, Idaho’s largest hospital network. “…the Court concludes that the Idaho Court fully adjudicated that Mr. Bundy acted in a willful and malicious manner in defaming the St. Luke’s Creditors,” Thurman wrote. Bankruptcy courts can discharge most kinds of debt including in some cases civil court judgments, but not if they are earned through “willful” and “malicious” means. The case stems from Bundy and his close friend, Diego Rodriguez, claiming in 2022 that St. Luke’s trafficked and kidnapped children to make money while staging protests that briefly shut down its downtown Boise hospital. Bundy said he was defending Rodriguez’s grandson, who had been taken from his parents by police and brought to St. Luke’s for a health check. The health system sued the two shortly after the protests, saying they defamed the organization and several of its staff in their repeated online videos and web posts. After months of fits and starts where Bundy didn’t attend several hearings, the Idaho court issued a default judgment against him. The decision to skip hearings during the original court case played into Judge Thurman’s ruling. “That Defendant Bundy received notice of and failed to assert his interests at trial in Idaho demonstrates that he made a conscious choice not to engage with the Idaho Lawsuit or defend himself,” he wrote in his decision Tuesday. Bundy has repeatedly said he’s simply told the truth about the hospital and its work within the child protection services arena. He wrote in an email he understands the bankruptcy court ruling, but maintains St. Luke’s altered evidence in the original trial – something he never appealed in Idaho. His responses to St. Luke’s opposition in the bankruptcy case raise constitutional speech arguments, along with due process claims. Thurman wrote that, “...makes them appropriate in an appeal to a higher Idaho state court (should the applicable Idaho rules authorize an appeal) but not in a proceeding before a United States federal court.” “In this present situation, the Court’s hands are tied. The law is clear, and to hold otherwise would violate fundamental constitutional principles and well-settled law,” Thurman wrote. Erik Stidham, the lead attorney for St. Luke's in the case, said in a statement, "Just like everyone else, Mr. Bundy cannot use the bankruptcy process to avoid accountability for a jury verdict based on willful and malicious wrongdoing." Bundy’s original $52 million judgment has been accruing interest at 10.25% annually since it was first imposed in 2023. Thurman ordered St. Luke’s to file further documents calculating the total amount it is still owed minus any funds already seized. Copyright 2025 Boise State Public Radio
-
And they're not always accurate. I'm close to a very bright woman from China (she happens to be in China now), and she often disagrees with iphone translations. I would have sent the photo to her, but the time difference is a bitch.
-
I'll be driving out to Palm Springs tomorrow (where it's fucking hot) and I'm really worried about getting windmill cancer along the 10 before I get there.
-
he ripped the shit out of it for MLB hit #1000
-
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
Gil Bang replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
-
I'm thinking that this Jacob Wohl dickhead deserves his own thread
Gil Bang replied to Gil Bang's topic in Cloak Room
Burkman and Wohl Plead to Intimidating Voters in Robocall Case August 01, 2025 LANSING – Today, John Burkman, 59, of Arlington, Virginia, and Jacob Wohl, 27, of Fairfax, Virginia, pled no contest to orchestrating a series of robocalls aimed at suppressing the vote of predominantly black voters in Detroit in the 2020 general election, announced Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. They pled to: One count of election law – bribing/intimidating voters, a 5-year felony; One count of conspiracy to commit an election law violation, a 5-year felony; One count of using a computer to commit the crime of election law – intimidating voters, a 7-year felony; and Using a computer to commit the crime of conspiracy, a 7-year felony. “After five years, I’m glad this case has finally reached a resolution,” Nessel said. “Deceptive and racially targeted suppression schemes will not be tolerated in Michigan. My office will continue to pursue and prosecute voter intimidation, no matter how long it takes, to ensure that Michiganders can exercise their right to vote free from fear and deception.” Burkman and Wohl attempted to discourage voters from participating in the general election by creating and funding a robocall targeting specific and multiple urban areas across the country, including Detroit. The calls were made in late August of 2020 and went out to nearly 12,000 residents with phone numbers registered to an address with a Detroit zip code. They promoted falsehoods that: voting by mail would place voters’ personal information in a public database that will be used by police departments to track down individuals with outstanding warrants; voting by mail would place voters’ personal information in a public database that will be used by credit card companies to collect outstanding debts; and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were attempting to utilize vote by mail records to track individuals for mandatory vaccines. The robocall named Burkman and Wohl as responsible for the calls and claimed them to be the founders of a “civil rights organization” named “Project 1599.” It closed with a message urging the predominantly Black recipients to not be “finessed into giving your private information to the man. Stay safe and beware of vote by mail.” The Attorney General has called the robocall an egregious example of voter suppression. Following the formal charges from the Attorney General in 2020, both men were bound over for trial. Burkman and Wohl filed a motion to quash the charges in the circuit court. The circuit court denied this motion, and the defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals declined to hear their appeal. Burkman and Wohl then filed an application in the Michigan Supreme Court, which remanded the matter to the Court of Appeals and required it hear the appeal. The Court of Appeals heard the defendants’ arguments, ruling in a published opinion that the statute governed their conduct as alleged and that it was a constitutional application of the statute. Defendants Burkman and Wohl then appealed that ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court, which upheld the validity of the statute, ruled that it governed the conduct as alleged, and remanded the matter to the Court of Appeals to apply a limiting construction of the law to ensure that it did not ensnare constitutionally protected speech. On remand, the Court of Appeals ruled that the alleged actions here would not be constitutionally protected speech. The Michigan Supreme Court then recently declined to hear an appeal of a lower court decision that upheld the criminal charges against Burkman and Wohl. Burkman and Wohl will be sentenced before Judge Margaret VanHouten in the 3rd Circuit Court in Wayne County on December 1. ### -
for those that didn't hear; the Metallica channel will be available on radios without a valid subscription for a while.
-
the "Mine Shaft"? You're sending him to a gay bar, aren't you?
-
-
Howard's agent died. I assume Julia Buchwald is repping him these days. I'm sure that's a factor. he doesn't work all that much.
-
Ghislaine "Sgt. Schultz" Maxwell: "I know NOTH-ING"
Gil Bang replied to Gil Bang's topic in Cloak Room
I hope he feeds those fucks spaghetti with chili -
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Gil Bang replied to Horn Dog's topic in Cloak Room
the above led me to this: -
lot's of dumbfucks in Trump's America
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... COOKIE MONSTER!