Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

What smoke?

You ain't in the puff puff pass circle homie cause people got tired of answering your question, "What if d-o-g spelled cat?". 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

It’s like 12 Monkeys up in here. 

... and that's an apt description, considering it's not science fiction, but documentary.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Hank_Hill said:

68 dudes DMd a poster with hopes of tiddy pics. That’s not nothing.

Who said that I was the one showing them? Just kidding!! Seriously though a ton of people don’t post a lot but are still around the board. Lots of faces I haven’t seen in a while. But I been to a lot of surly tailgates so people already know me. In real life. 

Posted
Just now, BigHornedLurker said:

200.gif

Hey try answering all that on your phone. I’m out of town scouting lakes. It’s damned hard to cut and paste and keep track of it on your phone. In DMs when you get that many. Which I do. Lol. 😂 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Nicole44 said:

Hey try answering all that on your phone. I’m out of town scouting lakes. It’s damned hard to cut and paste and keep track of it on your phone. In DMs when you get that many. Which I do. Lol. 😂 

@BigHornedLurker What she's saying to you is, "You're on the list".

  • Haha 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

Hey try answering all that on your phone. I’m out of town scouting lakes. It’s damned hard to cut and paste and keep track of it on your phone. In DMs when you get that many. Which I do. Lol. 😂 

Total smoke show!  We are not worthy, Nicole!  (But we are not ungrateful!)

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:

Total smoke show!  We are not worthy, Nicole!  (But we are not ungrateful!)

Thanks my dude! Glad we are pals. 

Edited by Nicole44
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:

Total smoke show!  We are not worthy, Nicole!  (But we are not ungrateful!)

Wait, did she send you little people cuck porn too? Or did you win the magic prize? 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Jkwellborn said:


Maybe it was sharpies.

Dammit, first I get the dingsong kink term dropped on me now sharpies. I really thought I was "in the know" as I like to think my kink game is strong. It certainly appears as if I have deluded myself as I have no clue about sharpie kink.

Please, do tell or feel free to DM.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jkwellborn said:


Maybe it was sharpies.

I just need one of you fools to mail me a shank or something in some type of way that’s cleverly hidden to get past the guards…I mean valets at my jail…I mean posh downtown digs. Thanks k. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Da Fino said:

What the fuck is happening to this place? You old fuckers are losing your minds. 

1422.thumb.jpg.4c2c861febdc6e7ab5166b8eae2668f9.jpg

One flew over the cuck-oos nest!

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted
2 minutes ago, Da Fino said:

What the fuck is happening to this place? You old fuckers are losing your minds. 

This thread is indeed a sad representation of Longhorn fandom, populated by the same collection of conspiracy theorists who somehow convinced themselves that Urban Meyer was going to coach here five years ago by looking at hotel room pictures and eating McRib sandwiches.

While I agree there are a universe of possibilities this offseason—this is college football after all—the most likely scenario is that Sarkisian returns, hires an OC, makes one or two other coaching changes, and gets the resources needed to make a difference in the portal. Then, with a seasoned Arch Manning Texas makes a serious run at a national championship in 2026. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

Man, we have some dumbass fans. 

 

 

All following Data is per CFBStats 

Offense Rankings:

Total offense: #80

Scoring offense: #64

Rusing Offense: #103

Passing Offense #50

Sacks Allowed: #86

Tackles for Loss Allowed: #106 

First Downs: #108

Time of Possesion: #97

Red Zone Conversions: #85

Third Down Conversions: #82

Of note: Arch Manning's #40 ranking in Passing All Games is the highest single stat of the entire Texas offense kept by CFBStats that I found. Please feel free to double check. 

Penalties: #119

Defense Rankings:

Total Defense: #23 

Rushing Defense: #6

Passing Defense #91

Interceptions: #32

Passes Defended: #62

Posted
4 minutes ago, SimkinsMan said:

This thread is indeed a sad representation of Longhorn fandom, populated by the same collection of conspiracy theorists who somehow convinced themselves that Urban Meyer was going to coach here five years ago by looking at hotel room pictures and eating McRib sandwiches.

While I agree there are a universe of possibilities this offseason—this is college football after all—the most likely scenario is that Sarkisian returns, hires an OC, makes one or two other coaching changes, and gets the resources needed to make a difference in the portal. Then, with a seasoned Arch Manning Texas makes a serious run at a national championship in 2026. 

Jfc. Don’t rile them up. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, SimkinsMan said:

This thread is indeed a sad representation of Longhorn fandom, populated by the same collection of conspiracy theorists who somehow convinced themselves that Urban Meyer was going to coach here five years ago by looking at hotel room pictures and eating McRib sandwiches.

While I agree there are a universe of possibilities this offseason—this is college football after all—the most likely scenario is that Sarkisian returns, hires an OC, makes one or two other coaching changes, and gets the resources needed to make a difference in the portal. Then, with a seasoned Arch Manning Texas makes a serious run at a national championship in 2026. 

He didn't do any of the underlined last off season (other than 2 former MB guys that are absolute failures) and has expressed no acknowledgement of any issues this season. Nor has he ever at any point taken ownership of issues of his own nor the staff. He has consistently blamed players. He also has expressed no willingness to make changes. So why are your assumptions, with zero historical facts or data to back them less delusional than any other position? 

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted
9 minutes ago, SimkinsMan said:

This thread is indeed a sad representation of Longhorn fandom, populated by the same collection of conspiracy theorists who somehow convinced themselves that Urban Meyer was going to coach here five years ago by looking at hotel room pictures and eating McRib sandwiches.

While I agree there are a universe of possibilities this offseason—this is college football after all—the most likely scenario is that Sarkisian returns, hires an OC, makes one or two other coaching changes, and gets the resources needed to make a difference in the portal. Then, with a seasoned Arch Manning Texas makes a serious run at a national championship in 2026. 

You are on the good stuff. Share with the group. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Da Fino said:

Jfc. Don’t rile them up. 

Yeah, facts are a bitch and using logic to support your position is absolutely getting all emotional and all riled up.

I just posted the horrible numbers, defend them with facts.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

Yeah, facts are a bitch and using logic to support your position is absolutely getting all emotional and all riled up.

I just posted the horrible numbers, defend them with facts.

No one is disputing your facts.

It's the innuendo we question.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

No one is disputing your facts.

It's the innuendo we question.

To question without substance, fact or even an opposing position in your case is social media shit talking or trolling the contrary opinion. It's your specialty and it's why I like you so much.

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

To question without substance, fact or even an opposing position in your case is social media shit talking or trolling the contrary opinion. It's your specialty and it's why I like you so much.

You expect him to have substance to disprove rumors that can’t be shared here? When did you stop beating your wife? 

Edited by B00M
I’m obviously kidding, trying to illustrate the absurdity
Posted
3 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

To question without substance, fact or even an opposing position in your case is social media shit talking or trolling the contrary opinion. It's your specialty and it's why I like you so much.

I'm just wondering when you're going to post facts or anything of substance to support your assertion that Steve Sarkisian has engaged in behavior that will result in his being fired for cause.

Posted
1 hour ago, WinningIsHard said:

Yeah your cryptic teenage girl posting is wayyyy better. It adds so much value, like posting the same picture two or three times in a row. You’re a legend. 

Get a grip, there is smoke everywhere she’s one of several that have said he’s got major personal issues going on and it’s starting to break and media is just now starting to poke around. Just because you don’t believe doesn’t mean it isn’t there. 

and before you start with the Nicole is an attention whatever you won’t stop either. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, B00M said:

You expect him to have substance to disprove rumors that can’t be shared here? When did you stop beating your wife? 

DD is a performance artist man. I am a fan of his work. When you get it you get it. He’s fun! 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, scramblyn said:

Get a grip, there is smoke everywhere she’s one of several that have said he’s got major personal issues going on and it’s starting to break and media is just now starting to poke around. Just because you don’t believe doesn’t mean it isn’t there. 

and before you start with the Nicole is an attention whatever you won’t stop either. 

What is that smoke? What, exactly, are those personal issues? List them.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, B00M said:

You expect him to have substance to disprove rumors that can’t be shared here? When did you stop beating your wife? 

Rumors are not the issue for me. Its Sark's truly shitty performance in multiple ways with lots of data. See my post on page 229. 

Now you feel compelled to attack me because you don't like the data. 

That tracks.

3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I'm just wondering when you're going to post facts or anything of substance to support your assertion that Steve Sarkisian has engaged in behavior that will result in his being fired for cause.

You responded to my post on page 229.

So you're well aware and trolling but you'll continue to do so.

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...