Jump to content
  • I think that it’s now safe to say that we Texans now live in a failed state.  30 years of GOP rule, setting our own standard, living the “Texas Dream,” which they’ve bragged about relentlessly…and let’s see where we are:

    A majority of the state in complete failure, unable to deliver the most BASIC of services (things that are called “utilities,” not “luxuries,” for a reason).  No power.  No water.  No means of clearing roads (that one, I can’t fault the state so much….but it wouldn’t be as big a crisis if people weren’t stuck in their homes with no power and water).  So citizens are stuck in their homes, some of them dying there. 

    Water resource planning?  After pretending for decades that a drought would never happen again, and not doing ANYTHING to develop resources in the state water plan (a document actually developed using science and mathematical projections), we had several locations, including actual cities, down to a few days of water supply.  We’ve finally gotten on our horse a bit, but it may be too late if the next drought comes anytime soon.  

    State rank in key categories:

    Education – 34

    Health Care - 37

    Infrastructure - 33

    Opportunity - 39

    Environment - 44

    Infrastructure - 33 

    In overall quality of life ranking by US News, we are now #38, down from #36 just two years ago.  At that rate, we’ll be in the bottom 3 within ten years.

    We are SUPER independent, and FUCK the feds….but we have requested federal disaster assistance more than any other state in the past decade or so.

    But hey, our economy is ranked #15!

    That’s right, we have a “roaring economy” and the “Texas Miracle!”  But we can’t deliver the basics for our citizens.  The economy is VERY efficient at funneling bazillions to the very few…..with little of it “trickling down” to most Texans.  Yeah, the people on this board generally do fine, but face the facts – we’re the top 10% or so.  We are educated, older, and fortunate.

    Our federal system allows for state-by-state experiments.  Texas is the poster child for near anarcho-capitalism and zero regulation or oversight.  We have tested that approach, for over a generation now (30 years of Republican rule).  That approach is a failure.  The evidence is undeniable, and overwhelming.  It doesn’t matter how many River Oaks millionaires you produce if the rest of your people are dying in their homes.  Shit, some of those River Oaks millionaires might be freezing to death today, too.

    The kids of a middle class family can hardly afford to go to a good state school.  Their prospects for employment are mediocre.  Their prospects of suffering crippling medical debt at some point are significant.  Their chances of not having basic utilities needed for life safety at some point – all but certain.  Their chances of becoming ill or dying from a pollution-caused illness are material.

    What’s the result?  Our leaders have sold Texas as a paradise – move here!  Bring your business here!  And some businesses have done so, adding opportunity…..but providing little to no tax support for the infrastructure we all depend on.  To the contrary, over the past few years, I know more and more people – educated people, people who can do their jobs elsewhere, who are looking to bail on this state.  It’s people with young kids, who want them to grow up in a better place.  It’s people in their working years, who simply want a better path.  It’s retirees, who want a safe and secure place to live.

    We have consumed our seed stock.  We have burned through our reserves.  We are now consuming ourselves.  The ability to pitch Texas as the land of opportunity is done.  Seeing what we have become, the tentative thought/plan my wife and I had of wrapping up our careers here and then getting the hell out of Dodge is becoming much more concrete.  My children are already unlikely to make their future in this state.  Now we are, too.

    But the response from the Republican leadership and their sycophants – “how are you gonna pay for it?  Taxes?  That’s socialism!  You want that stuff, you have to pay for it!”

    Fuck yes I do, and I’m okay with that.  I want groceries…so I have to pay HEB.  I want a car…so I have to pay Ford.  I want clothes…..so I have to pay Dillards.  I want my population educated….so I have to pay the school district.  I want electricity, with enough capacity to keep us running when we need it…..so I have to pay my bill, maybe with a capacity surcharge.  I want water to come out of the taps….so I have to pay for development of resources and maintenance of infrastructure.  I want roads….so I pay taxes to build and maintain them.  YES, I have to pay for all of those things, and “nothing is free” – no fucking shit.  So, let’s pay for it.  We have the #15 economy….we HAVE the funds in this state.  An economy with the flow of funds that ours has can produce and maintain all of those results.  But we have chosen a different path; funnel all the dollars to the top, and spend next to nothing for the public good.  We have privatized profit….we have socialized the costs.  And we are dying because of it.

    My fellow Texans are dying in their homes….and there’s nothing I can do about it today.  And I am enraged.

    I love Texas.  I am 6th generation here.  My ancestors have Texas historical markers on their graves.  We helped make this state, and this state helped make us.  It educated us (back when college was affordable).  But it’s time to face the fact – this state is a failure, and on its current path, with its current leadership and philosophy, it will only get worse.  This state has a terrible future, unless we dramatically change our path.   Chances of that happening?  0.0% -- because we’ll continue to vote for the guys who make our leadership priorities bathroom bills, and transgender sports, and requiring the national anthem be played at certain events.  Any bill that has been proposed to improve emergency preparedness of gov’t entities has been crushed by the Republicans controlling the lege….but we will definitely stick with those guys.  No taxes.  No government functionality.

    What we are seeing happening right now is our system working EXACTLY AS IT WAS DESIGNED AND INTENDED TO WORK.  And we will, I guarantee it, collectively decide to stick with that.  This state is in free-fall, and anyone with eyes can see it.  And anyone with a brain is starting to think of ways to make their life elsewhere.  It breaks my goddamned heart to see us commit collective suicide, but here we are.

     

     


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Sbbruin

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

    Oh my god, you're ADORABLE.  

    Paxton's venality, criminality, dishonesty, and corruption are POSITIVES to the Texas voter pool.  When are you going to accept the truth that Texan voters are really awful people who actually like really awful things?

    If only Bugs could saw off Texas like he did Florida.  But he would need one big ass jigsaw to make all the necessary cuts.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Haha 2
    Bozo_Casanova

    Posted

    41 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

    Well, I mean....he doesn't yet have the well-known multi-year track record of crimes and corruption like Ken, but I'm sure he can catch up.  What I'm really saying is that Paxton trounces him in a primary too.  Paxton is unstoppable.  Because Texas Republican voters are not turned OFF by a shameless lying crook....voting for a shameless lying crook gives them a fucking boner that the Viagra folks would study for years.

    No, they aren’t turned off by it. But Hunt gives them everything they want without the baggage and a slam dunk. Plus, the normies will come back for Hunt.

    GOP primary voters in Texas are very focused on winning and are realistic about liabilities. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Brisketexan

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

    But Hunt gives them everything they want without the baggage and a slam dunk. Plus, the normies will come back for Hunt.

    Dude.  You missed a really huge problem Hunt has:

    VukFDv.gif

    The motivated nutbars are the entire GQP demo in the primary in Texas.  There are no fucking "normies" GTFO with that shit.  Anybody who started out as a normie and still votes GQP has drunk ALL the fucking kool-aid, and is now a fucking nutbar.

    Paxton wins whatever office in Texas he wants.  Easily.

     

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Like 1
    • Rage+1 1
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
    tx ind

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Sbbruin said:

    If only Bugs could saw off Texas like he did Florida.  But he would need one big ass jigsaw to make all the necessary cuts.

    The suck from Oklahoma would keep us attached

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Haha 3
    • Drool 1
    berlinerbaer

    Posted

    On 8/4/2025 at 8:37 PM, berlinerbaer said:

    Most blue states have independent commissions. Most red states and many purple states do not. If the commissions went away, the Dems would net a bunch of seats.

    Everyone is talking about California, but I think eliminating the commission in CA requires a ballot measure because it was enacted by ballot measure and a change in the state constitution. It's not a given that the voters will repeal it, since it's the kind of thing only partisan Dems would vote for.

    The few Dem states that do gerrymander (NY, IL, MD) will need to go hard to the paint, as will the few more that have commissions set up by laws that can be repealed by the legislature. I don't think CA is the way.

    Looks like I'm wrong and CA voters would pass a mid-decade gerrymander according to a poll done by a TV station in Sacramento.

    screenshot-2025-08-03-at-8-44-34-pm-6891

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
    bluto

    Posted (edited)

    4 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

    No, they aren’t turned off by it. But Hunt gives them everything they want without the baggage and a slam dunk. Plus, the normies will come back for Hunt.

    GOP primary voters in Texas are very focused on winning and are realistic about liabilities. 

    GOP voters know that statewide voting is a fuckin lock in Tx. If they cared about quality of candidate they wouldn’t have allowed Abbott to steam roll the voucher challengers in house primaries. 

    Edited by bluto
    • Like 1
    • Rage+1 1
    Bozo_Casanova

    Posted

    8 hours ago, bluto said:

    GOP voters know that statewide voting is a fuckin lock in Tx.

    No. They don’t. That’s what separates them from Democrats. Texas GOP voters care more about winning races than anything else. That’s why they were able to break the Democrats hold on the state. GOP voters in Texas haven’t gotten lazy yet. 

    They know Paxton is the favorite and can win. They aren’t sure he will and they know if will be expensive to get him there.
    Hunt, on the other hand, assures them of taking the natural statewide 56-44 break, making the race much cheaper to win, and presents an opportunity to take some black voters from Democrats as well, which then means the GOP could be competitive in local races in urban districts where they otherwise would not be. 
     

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
    WBT

    Posted

    42 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

    They know Paxton is the favorite and can win. They aren’t sure he will and they know if will be expensive to get him there.
    Hunt, on the other hand, assures them of taking the natural statewide 56-44 break, making the race much cheaper to win, and presents an opportunity to take some black voters from Democrats as well, which then means the GOP could be competitive in local races in urban districts where they otherwise would not be. 

    Yep.  Paxton and Cruz are the only statewide Rs who underperform the statewide judicial races that are as good a proxy as you can get for generic R vs generic D.

    Add in the natural midterm blowback and the environment is the same as the one that let Beto keep it close against Cruz in 2018.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    bluto

    Posted

    Paxton just won a statewide midterm race by 10 pts. And that was during the tornado of shit flying around him regarding whistleblower suits and securities fraud. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
    Pasken

    Posted

    41 minutes ago, bluto said:

    Paxton just won a statewide midterm race by 10 pts. And that was during the tornado of shit flying around him regarding whistleblower suits and securities fraud. 

    I blame the regular program in Texas public schools. I took a few non-honors classes for shit I really wasn't good at and you don't learn anything. It's like busywork babysitting. 

    Bozo_Casanova

    Posted

    2 hours ago, bluto said:

    Paxton just won a statewide midterm race by 10 pts. And that was during the tornado of shit flying around him regarding whistleblower suits and securities fraud. 

     He underperformed his whole ticket in a midterm that was essentially a referendum on a Covid and inflation.

    • Rage+1 1
    Brisketexan

    Posted

     He underperformed his whole ticket in a midterm that was essentially a referendum on a Covid and inflation.

    But he also has a hard and known floor. “Hey, if we run a psychotic, crooked criminal, how low will it go?” We know that. He wins. No matter what. He could buttfuck a puppy to death on live TV, and not go below that floor. AND…the MAGA base LOVES him…BECAUSE he’s the type of guy who would kill a puppy to own the libs.
    bluto

    Posted

    Kinda splitting hairs on underperforming the ticket…

    Abbott got 54.7% and won by 10.9%
    patrick got 53.7% and won by 10.3%
    paxton got 53.4% and won by 9.76%… and that needs context as Paxton actually outgained the other two comparing it to prior election. 

    pacman

    Posted (edited)

    This is absolutely crazy to me. Our mortgage is a dick hair over $1000. I can't imagine a car, but in the land of 70k trucks it makes sense.

    Screenshot_20250808-121659.png

    Edited by pacman
    bluto

    Posted

    ^not how you humble brag

    • Haha 3
    CooterBrown

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, pacman said:

    This is absolutely crazy to me. Our mortgage is a dick hair over $1000. I can't imagine a car, but in the land of 70k trucks it makes sense.

    Screenshot_20250808-121659.png

    My wife said my sister just bought a pickup for like $85,000.  IIRC, they live in a doublewide, so this checks out.

     

    • Like 2
    • Haha 5
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
    Longhorn_Fan68

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, bluto said:

    ^not how you humble brag

    I was thinking the same thing. what a kinda weird thing to admit. lol

    LCHorn

    Posted

    53 minutes ago, pacman said:

    This is absolutely crazy to me. Our mortgage is a dick hair over $1000. I can't imagine a car, but in the land of 70k trucks it makes sense.

    Screenshot_20250808-121659.png

    Derek Thompson had Conor Sen (Bloomberg columnist) on his podcast a couple of weeks back and they think housing unaffordability is pushing crypto investing amongst younger generations--I wonder if this is an example of that, as well ("I can't afford a house, but I can afford this car..")

    • Hook 'Em 2
    kevwun

    Posted

    That's a dumb way to spend money.  Cars don't go up in value.

    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 2
    Brisketexan

    Posted

    1 hour ago, kevwun said:

    That's a dumb way to spend money. 

    My good sir, "galactic stupidity" is our national ethos now.  Imagine the dumbest things you could think or do.  Then sit down and brace yourself, because everything our society is doing is 10X dumber than the dumbest shit you can imagine.

    • Hook 'Em 5
    hookem2010

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

     He underperformed his whole ticket in a midterm that was essentially a referendum on a Covid and inflation.

    Anecdotal, but in one of my now regular arguments with my parents since reestablishishing contact, my Dad did acknowledge that Paxton and Patrick specifically are clowns that he wouldn't vote for again. 

    How does he not see that the average R, especially in Texas, is 99% as bad? Not sure. Small victories, I guess...

    • Hook 'Em 3
    Macanudo

    Posted

    1 hour ago, kevwun said:

    That's a dumb way to spend money.  Cars don't go up in value.

    Trump announced yesterday that the Administration supports private equity and crypto as investments in 401k plans.  The Great Fleecing is coming.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    • Rage+1 4
    • Drool 1
    Nice Guy Eddie

    Posted

    My current vehicle carried a $700 payment over 4 years and that felt outrageous. Couldn’t imagine a 4 figure payment, most likely for 72 or 84 months.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    tx 3 putt

    Posted

    5 hours ago, pacman said:

    This is absolutely crazy to me. Our mortgage is a dick hair over $1000. I can't imagine a car, but in the land of 70k trucks it makes sense.

    Screenshot_20250808-121659.png

     

    jeep has a $123k Cherokee

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    • Rage+1 2
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
    Brisketexan

    Posted

    29 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

    Trump announced yesterday that the Administration supports private equity and crypto as investments in 401k plans.  The Great Fleecing is coming.

    Give it time.  A future step is "your 401k loses tax-exempt status if it is NOT invested at least 30% in an approved crypto*."

    * Approved crypto will include Trumpcoin, and/or any other crypto that directly enriches the Trump family or indirectly does so (the primary beneficiaries of said coin spend $10 million at MAL every year or some shit).

    • Like 2
    • Rage+1 1
    Brisketexan

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

     

    jeep has a $123k Cherokee

     

    That's insane.  I mean, when the SCOTUS voids the 13th amendment next year, you'll surely be able to pick up a Cherokee for half that price, just like back in the old days.

    cherokke_orig.jpeg

     

    • Like 3
    • Haha 3
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
    Macanudo

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

    Give it time.  A future step is "your 401k loses tax-exempt status if it is NOT invested at least 30% in an approved crypto*."

    * Approved crypto will include Trumpcoin, and/or any other crypto that directly enriches the Trump family or indirectly does so (the primary beneficiaries of said coin spend $10 million at MAL every year or some shit).

    It's funny because it's true. 

    Most people at my firm (wealth management and retirement plan consultating are very opposed to this.  But when you look at the articles and responses on LinkedIn, places like State Street are all for it.  The gridt angle is off the charts.  

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Rage+1 1
    Sbbruin

    Posted

    5 hours ago, pacman said:

    This is absolutely crazy to me. Our mortgage is a dick hair over $1000. I can't imagine a car, but in the land of 70k trucks it makes sense.

    Screenshot_20250808-121659.png

    And people will put almost nothing down, finance it over 84 months, and pay 9% interest.  Because fuck financial literacy, I need my truck.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    Pato del Muerto

    Posted (edited)

    Surely those that willingly finance 100k of vehicle debt aren’t the same ones bitching about how expensive things are and they can’t afford to buy a house. 
     

    i would be sick to my stomach if I was dumb enough to do that and then a year later realized that I owe 95k on my now 75k car, when I decide I can’t afford it and need to sell it. 

    Edited by Pato del Muerto
    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Like 1
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
    Kyrie Eleison

    Posted

    y'all really need to take a drive behind the Pine Curtain. 

    mile after mile of mobile homes with a brand new $100K Ford F250 and $110K+ 21' Skeeter parked in front.

    priorities, my dudes...  

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Pato del Muerto

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Kyrie Eleison said:

    y'all really need to take a drive behind the Pine Curtain. 

    mile after mile of mobile homes with a brand new $100K Ford F250 and $110K+ 21' Skeeter parked in front.

    priorities, my dudes...  

    the boat is on a 15 year note probably so even worse

    • Haha 1
    Satchel

    Posted

    On another note, what the hell is the point of the Wesley Hunt commercials that are everywhere?

    LCHorn

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Kyrie Eleison said:

    y'all really need to take a drive behind the Pine Curtain. 

    mile after mile of mobile homes with a brand new $100K Ford F250 and $110K+ 21' Skeeter parked in front.

    priorities, my dudes...  

    yeah, but that’s same as it ever was-I remember going with my Dad, who was doing some appraisal work to make ends meet after the S&L’s went to shit in the early 80’s, in Crosby and Mont Belvieu and seeing clean Corvette’s parked in front of small houses that looked like goats lived there.  
     

    There’s another, more urban contingent who can’t make a $3k house payment but they can do $1k on a SUV, and delayed gratification is for pussies.  

    • Hook 'Em 1
    Elvis

    Posted

    Other people’s car payments.  A failed state.  

    Elvis

    Posted

    9 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

    That's insane.  I mean, when the SCOTUS voids the 13th amendment next year, you'll surely be able to pick up a Cherokee for half that price, just like back in the old days.

    cherokke_orig.jpeg

     

    You really wrote that? WTF?!

    South Austin

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Elvis said:

    You really wrote that? WTF?!

    You think a Cherokee will cost more?

    • Like 3
    • Haha 4
    DDD Dad

    Posted

    8 minutes ago, South Austin said:

    You think a Cherokee will cost more?

    I can get you a good deal on an Apache. 

    sasquatch69

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

    I can get you a good deal on an Apache. 

    image.gif.3d954fec000315b18ed7525f98ea1fbd.gif

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Sawbonz

    Posted

    22 hours ago, Pasken said:

    I blame the regular program in Texas public schools. I took a few non-honors classes for shit I really wasn't good at and you don't learn anything. It's like busywork babysitting. 

    image.jpeg.2873261f686d1dd98f912e65bd7a823a.jpeg

     

    • Haha 1
    South Austin

    Posted

    37 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

    I can get you a good deal on an Apache. 

    PM sent.

    • Haha 3
    Captain Ron

    Posted

    On 8/8/2025 at 8:03 AM, Bozo_Casanova said:

    No. They don’t. That’s what separates them from Democrats. Texas GOP voters care more about winning races than anything else. That’s why they were able to break the Democrats hold on the state. GOP voters in Texas haven’t gotten lazy yet. 

    They know Paxton is the favorite and can win. They aren’t sure he will and they know if will be expensive to get him there.
    Hunt, on the other hand, assures them of taking the natural statewide 56-44 break, making the race much cheaper to win, and presents an opportunity to take some black voters from Democrats as well, which then means the GOP could be competitive in local races in urban districts where they otherwise would not be. 
     

     

     

     

     

    To be fair I would put the state of the GOP in Texas clearly in the hands of well orchestrated moves by Rove and others. I recommend reading this -https://www.texasobserver.org/john-cornyn-profile-mitch-mcconnell-trump-2020/ which talks about the moves made during the 80s and 90s that put us squarely where we are today.

    • Hook 'Em 3
    Ag with kids

    Posted

    On 7/31/2025 at 10:10 PM, Bozo_Casanova said:

    Wait. You’ve consistently supported a consideration of party support in creating congressional districts.
    My opinion is and has always been that partisan gerrymandering is bad, period, at all times and in all places and that party outcomes should *never* be considered in the districting process.

    Have you changed your mind? California and Illinois just do what you’ve always advocated for. 
    The difference is that you and I don’t live in those places. And for the record. I really don’t care about them. I do care that northern Hays county, where I served in an official capacity for about a decade, will be deprived of congressional representation by sharing a rep with places that it has nothing in common with.

    My consideration of party support had to do with how a state voted.

    CA voted Harris 58.47% Trump 38.33%.  Their legislature should be close to representing that ratio.

    However, it's currently 83%-17%

    A state that votes 55-65%-45-35% for X party should have a state legislature and US House representation somewhere around those values.

    Unfortunately, you will NEVER be able to do a NON gerrymandered map.  Look at every single state - the rural areas are bright red.  WHY?  Because they have "conservative values" (however you want to define those)...

    But, then you get to the urban areas and that's why you have the "salamanders" crawling all over them.  And you want, I forgot what you called it, but I think "communities of interest" or something like that to be linked.  I don't think I ever argued against that.  People in urban or even suburban areas don't live where they live to fit some type of good "district map"...

    My whole point has been that the legislature makeup should match the voting makeup.

    How do you propose that districts be drawn up that ONLY reflect "communities of interest" and yet allow the majority in the state to have their voting "power" be reflected in a way that actually works?

    • Fuck You 1
    Ag with kids

    Posted

    On 8/1/2025 at 12:39 AM, Eskimohorn said:


    Dems will gladly accept nonpartisan redistricting commissions across the country.

    They have one...

     

    And their "nonpartisan" redistricting commission gerrymandered the state to 83%-17% when the state votes 59%-39%...

    • Fuck You 2
    Ag with kids

    Posted

    On 7/31/2025 at 10:22 PM, Bozo_Casanova said:

    Btw, @Ag with kids, are you OK?
    Is that the best you can do? After defending such an unconcionable position for so many years it’s pretty sad that “the Dems in California do it too!!1!1!!” is where you landed, like I give a fuck about what Democrats do, or California. Whom are you even addressing?
    It makes me think your media diet must be pretty low calorie. 

    How about this:  if you can’t defend this gerrymander, at least you know your party is going to get to the bottom of this Epstein scandal, amirite.

    I don't like how many states have apportioned their voting structure.

     

    HOWEVER, I also don't think that the right should acquiesce to the fact that the left has "gerrymandered" or "partisan apportioned" their legislatures to be more partisan than the right.  And are now demanding "fairness"...

    The right should return the favor and get on an even field and THEN negotiate to change things.  Otherwise, they're doing every election with AT LEAST one hand tied behind their back

     

    Hell, blue states are apportioned at 79% Democrat.  Red states are at 76% Republican.  IF Texas gets 5 more seats, the red states STILL won't be at 79%.

     

    Tell YOUR side to change first since you don't like the way the districts are set up...

     

    BTW, to answer your original question...Yes, I'm OK.  Thanks for asking.

    • Fuck You 5
    Ag with kids

    Posted

    On 8/1/2025 at 5:22 AM, Bojack said:

    You stupid motherfucker, you make a political statement every time you post on this website because your avatar is a dumbass political joke. You do it everywhere except the place that's designated for politics. 

    Meh...

     

    I changed it from my avatar that was on shaggy/hornfans that was kind of a joke on my school...

     

    I'll change it so that the sand will get out of your vag...

    • Fuck You 2



    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...