Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Disco Strangler said:

Hilarious that Cruz thinks he can whitewash his complicity in MAGA's descent into constant culture war, grift and lawlessness.

image.png.d191f9651ab8d2026d3e09c3a6a35ae2.png

Seriously? Cruz fucking lives for Culture wars. He's proud of it. 

Posted
6 hours ago, The Dog said:

 

Mark Levin making fun of Megyn Kelly for her "limited vocabulary" while shilling daily for Trump.   Oi vey.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Knives out!

 

Quote

with the House Republicans underperforming for the first time in the Trump era

Yes, surely it has nothing to do with the president.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Knives out!

 

First, didn't the republicans underperform at the midway point of Trump's first term? And then again in the actual election?

Second, then why don't they fucking call for a vote? Did they slip in some rule saying they couldn't after the last fucking fiasco? 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:

Second, then why don't they fucking call for a vote? Did they slip in some rule saying they couldn't after the last fucking fiasco? 

Remember the vote-a-rama last time they tried to replace a speaker? 

It's easier just to use discharge petitions and go around Johnson.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Dog said:

Remember the vote-a-rama last time they tried to replace a speaker? 

It's easier just to use discharge petitions and go around Johnson.

Yeah, that's what I was referencing by the "last fiasco."

Discharge petitions don't fix the leadership issue, and ineptitude, which is what Stefanik claims she wants to fix. If it's really a problem then call a vote. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Yeah, that's what I was referencing by the "last fiasco."

Discharge petitions don't fix the leadership issue, and ineptitude, which is what Stefanik claims she wants to fix. If it's really a problem then call a vote. 

yes-evil.gif

Posted
3 minutes ago, TheStoicPaisano said:

Retconning of McCarthy is hilarious.

I’m waiting for Callie Gingrich’s chili suit.

 

IMG_1394.jpeg

Chico's has all the best chili making suits.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Yeah, that's what I was referencing by the "last fiasco."

Discharge petitions don't fix the leadership issue, and ineptitude, which is what Stefanik claims she wants to fix. If it's really a problem then call a vote. 

There is no leader other than Trump, and that's the problem. He literally calls all of the shots for both the Executive and Legislative branches. Even when he wasn't president he controlled what the House did. He's pretty much the Speaker of the House in addition to being the President, and Johnson is simply the conduit for whatever he wants. 

So the problem is twofold for the GOP. First, they need to actually have a consensus on who to elect. Second, that person needs to be willing to be Trump's "errand boy" until they ultimately lose the House next year.

Then they can go back to doing what they do best, which is to simply oppose whatever the Democrats say and do with no ideas or throughs of their own (other than whatever Trump is posting on social media at that moment.)

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, TheStoicPaisano said:

Retconning of McCarthy is hilarious.

I’m waiting for Callie Gingrich’s chili suit.

 

IMG_1394.jpeg

I maintain that she is either the worst....or the best/freakiest...sex on the planet.  And there really is no "in-between" option.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

I maintain that she is either the worst....or the best/freakiest...sex on the planet.  And there really is no "in-between" option.

I feel like that about every conservative woman that has that hair. It’s a specific look that a ton of the maga older women seem to have. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

All Johnson does is what Trump wants. This feels more like Stafanik trying to position herself for leadership once Trump is gone. 

The problem is, Trump is both too stupid and too narcissist to even know what/stick with "what he wants."  What he wants is to win everything and feel good all the time.  So, he tells Mikey to do exactly what he tells him.  Mikey does that, and it doesn't work/win (because it was a stupid strategy to begin with).  Trump can't self-reflect and say "I can't blame Mikey, he did exactly what I asked . . . I guess my idea wasn't that good."  Nope.  He has to blame Mikey for the failure, even though what Mikey executed was Trump's plan, step-for-step.

This is Trump-petulance-driven, I agree with Bozo.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SydneyCarton said:

First, didn't the republicans underperform at the midway point of Trump's first term? And then again in the actual election?

Second, then why don't they fucking call for a vote? Did they slip in some rule saying they couldn't after the last fucking fiasco? 

I'd say the Republicans have underperformed in every election since 2016 in which Trump wasn't on the ballot.  Even the 2022 "red wave" was pretty anemic.  Which may present some challenges for them going forward.  But, they still have the red state gerrymandering advantage in the House, the small state advantage in the Senate and electoral college, and of course SCOTUS.  

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

All Johnson does is what Trump wants. This feels more like Stafanik trying to position herself for leadership once Trump is gone. 

If Johnson makes Trump looks bad, it doesn't fucking matter how big of a kiss ass sycophant Johnson is. Trump will take him down.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Tuco said:

I'd say the Republicans have underperformed in every election since 2016 in which Trump wasn't on the ballot.  Even the 2022 "red wave" was pretty anemic.  Which may present some challenges for them going forward.  But, they still have the red state gerrymandering advantage in the House, the small state advantage in the Senate and electoral college, and of course SCOTUS.  

Yeah that gave me a false sense of security that the Democrats had survived the backlash from the inflation wave we got after the pandemic. But nope.

Posted
9 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

All Johnson does is what Trump wants. This feels more like Stafanik trying to position herself for leadership once Trump is gone. 

Except for the Epstein files.  Johnson tried to block it, but he couldn't control the entire caucus.  That's what Stafanik means about not being effective.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Tuco said:

Except for the Epstein files.  Johnson tried to block it, but he couldn't control the entire caucus.  That's what Stafanik means about not being effective.  

Like it matters. We are never going to see those files in any form that will name individualsthat matter.  Never gonna happen. 

Edited by DigglerontheHoof
Posted
Just now, DigglerontheHoof said:

Like it matters. We are never going to see those files in any form that will na ena es.  Never gonna happen. 

Maybe.  But that doesn't change the vote nor Trump's predictable response to it. 

 



×
×
  • Create New...