Jump to content

Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: They Can't Keep Getting Away With This


Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, SL Xpress said:

My biggest short term fear is that Texas toes the line with the spending cap while other programs do not, waiting for the enforcement arm to make an example of someone.

If that doesn't happen, or if the example is a slap on the wrist, I hope Texas is competitive with the prevailing salary structure to the extent they can still pursue national championships. 

But it's all so early now. No reason to hyperventilate at this point. But someone is not going to heed the House settlement caps in some way, and that someone isn't likely to be Texas. So we'll see what happens from there. 

Come on man…I’ve always assumed you’re old enough to remember when Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union by forcing them to spend billions they didn’t have just to keep up! (Insert your own “no CR” here:_______).

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, closetojumping said:

I worked with a woman for 6 years who was very hot in just about every way - great figure, face, hair, style, brains, attitude, you name it. Also, she had toe-thumbs. It was a distraction once you noticed it to the point of affecting how you viewed her overall appearance.

Like, oh sure, YOU worked with Megan Fox

 

IMG_0107.jpeg

Edited by MirrOlure
Posted
4 hours ago, Chili dog said:

Not in the picture I saw posted earlier. She’s meh. 

 

Then give me Jessica Biel. I could walk into the Target in Lakeway on a random Tuesday afternoon and find six women hotter than Heather Graham. Heather Graham looks like the picture on the warning label on the Accutane medication package telling you what your kid might look like if you take Accutane while pregnant. I’ll pass.  

This was in the 90's. Her body was all-time. And Jessica Biel most amazing trait was her skin (not to Buffalo Bill this shit), really mind-blowing, like a porcelain doll. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, MirrOlure said:

Come on man…I’ve always assumed you’re old enough to remember when Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union by forcing them to spend billions they didn’t have just to keep up! (Insert your own “no CR” here:_______).

Ha! I won a bunch of high school debates with that argument. Back in the early 80s high school kids weren't ready to make counter arguments. Made one girl break down in tears. 

The amount of spending on college athletes is entirely dependent on how much ego wealthy alums have tied up in seeing their alma mater be successful. Or in the case of Larry Ellison, apparently his wife's alma mater. Texas isn't going to be able to force other schools to spend money they don't have unless the enforcement arm of the House settlement is actually effective. My bet is that it's not effective for any number of reasons and the spending cap becomes a mirage. It will be interesting to see how schools like Texas respond. Right now the sales pitch is you can make more in Austin with legitimate NILs than you can anywhere else because of the size of the city and no sports team, plus the Longhorn national brand. I'm not saying that's wrong, but if an extremely wealthy person from another school wants to spend a decent portion of their wealth on college athletics, that's going to trump Austin's potential NIL market. 

But maybe the House settlement sticks. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, SL Xpress said:

Ha! I won a bunch of high school debates with that argument. Back in the early 80s high school kids weren't ready to make counter arguments. Made one girl break down in tears. 

 

I'm guessing yours was a war of attrition

  • Haha 5
Posted
8 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

What the hell is wrong with you? Did you eat paint chips as a kid? Did your mother drop you on your head? STFU if you don’t know anything about a topic being discussed. Given that criteria, we won’t ever hear from you again. 

His mother was his sister.

Posted
40 minutes ago, SL Xpress said:

Ha! I won a bunch of high school debates with that argument. Back in the early 80s high school kids weren't ready to make counter arguments. Made one girl break down in tears.

Surprised you could type this out what with the Parkinson's, Alex P Keaton.

  • Haha 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Lone Star Horn said:

like Megan Fox

Megan Fox has a genetic condition called brachydactyly type D, also known as "toe thumbs," which causes her thumb to appear shorter and rounder than usual

 

IMG_9762.gif

Posted
1 hour ago, mwaadeeb said:

This was in the 90's. Her body was all-time. And Jessica Biel most amazing trait was her skin (not to Buffalo Bill this shit), really mind-blowing, like a porcelain doll. 

Jessica's face is not not, uh, great. Her body, though? 

IMG_1902.jpeg

Posted
10 hours ago, Hookem2147 said:

Full update from Florida On3 mod

Yes I know the buzz thats been out there points to 4-star Kendall Guervil ending up at Texas when he commits on July 2.

However, I heard today that he and UF remain in contact, and there is still a feeling on UF's end that they are still battling for him. Most of the info we've heard since he set his commitment date points to Texas. He's named them his No. 1 for a few months, and it's felt like him setting a commitment date while on his Texas OV is telling. Wouldn't say I've heard any sort of confidence or optimism yet on UF's end. Hell, Texas still is confident I'm told.

Just passing along that I was told UF doesn't feel like they are out of it as they try to fight for him these last few days before his commitment date. I'm assuming NIL is what the key piece will have to be for this to turn another way.

Will update if we hear anything more on this.

Please change your font….I have a crick in my neck from reading it.

 

 

 

 

your font….I have a crick  in my neck.

Posted
4 hours ago, closetojumping said:

This is so over the top that I’m almost forced to believe it. Then I think about all of you pear-shaped people I’ve seen at the tailgates over the years and remember that Chili dog would be all over Heather Graham like white on rice if he had the chance. 

Emma Stone. Anna Kendrick. 

You haven’t seen me at a tailgate, but if you ever do, I will double down. I agree on Stone and Kendrick, though. Worse than Graham. But at least they can act.

And I feel kinda bad bagging on anyone’s appearance. Heather Graham isn’t hideous, but she’s far from a smoke show. I give her a 7. I think she triggers me because she is so bankrupt of any talent that she would have to look perfect to justify her fame, and she does not. She’s legitimately the worst actress in the history of cinema, and I find that distracting, like thumbs or knees for you. She ruined the second Austin Powers.

I also find it distracting that her eyes are on the side of her head and her forehead takes up a little too much real estate on her face. If she were in any way charming, clever or believable as an actress, I might be able to over look it. Instead, I find those imperfections agitating. If she weren’t willing to flash her tits, we’d never have heard of her.

Posted
4 hours ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Put down the drugs bro 

Or at least share them. I sincerely hope you brought enough for the whole class. Full doses, preferably. None of this microdosing silliness that really only exists to make people more effective proles

Posted
3 hours ago, Chili dog said:

You haven’t seen me at a tailgate, but if you ever do, I will double down. I agree on Stone and Kendrick, though. Worse than Graham. But at least they can act.

And I feel kinda bad bagging on anyone’s appearance. Heather Graham isn’t hideous, but she’s far from a smoke show. I give her a 7. I think she triggers me because she is so bankrupt of any talent that she would have to look perfect to justify her fame, and she does not. She’s legitimately the worst actress in the history of cinema, and I find that distracting, like thumbs or knees for you. She ruined the second Austin Powers.

I also find it distracting that her eyes are on the side of her head and her forehead takes up a little too much real estate on her face. If she were in any way charming, clever or believable as an actress, I might be able to over look it. Instead, I find those imperfections agitating. If she weren’t willing to flash her tits, we’d never have heard of her.

Y'all motherfuckers. Y'all motherfuckers. I'm not saying that Anna Kendrick, Heather Graham, young Susan Sarandon, or Emma Stone are all 12/10 or anything. And I'm sure those of you whose wives haven't left you penniless, destitute, and miserable beyond comprehension, dearly, dearly love your spouse and consider her (or him - no judgment here) to be the most gorgeous sentient alive.

But y'all motherfuckers. Somewhere between the ages of 17 and 27, likely the vast majority of that timeframe, all of y'all would have crawled belly first through broken glass for a single crumb of a crumb of pussy from any of the actresses listed above. Don't act like you wouldn't have. It's unbecoming. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, campcrunk said:

And I'm sure those of you whose wives haven't left you penniless, destitute, and miserable beyond comprehension, dearly, dearly love your spouse and consider her (or him - no judgment here) to be the most gorgeous sentient alive.

I mean, these aren't mutually exclusive. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

I mean, these aren't mutually exclusive. 

You're absolutely right - but there's definitely an implication in some of the above posts that the women listed there are somehow equivalent to the some of the women I saw waiting in line for a popular KC "BBQ" joint I had to eat at because a client said I just "had to try it." He's a fucking idiot, their shitty deli meat "brisket" sucks, searing cubes of beef does not a burnt end make, and their women are busted. The pork ribs were OK, I guess. Also, Anna Kendrick and young Susan Sarandon in particular - absolutely would. All day long. Or at least 37 seconds it would take me to finish

Anyway, I got mad about horrendous KC "BBQ" and kind of forgot my point. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, campcrunk said:

You're absolutely right - but there's definitely an implication in some of the above posts that the women listed there are somehow equivalent to the some of the women I saw waiting in line for a popular KC "BBQ" joint I had to eat at because a client said I just "had to try it." He's a fucking idiot, their shitty deli meat "brisket" sucks, searing cubes of beef does not a burnt end make, and their women are busted. The pork ribs were OK, I guess. Also, Anna Kendrick and young Susan Sarandon in particular - absolutely would. All day long. Or at least 37 seconds it would take me to finish

Anyway, I got mad about horrendous KC "BBQ" and kind of forgot my point. 

i mean my standards are definitely lower now than they were, too.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...