Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Featured Replies

I’m fine with Bregman at 2 because it kinda helps Altuve be Altuve.

he can swing at wild ass shit on the first pitch of the game. Connect on a leadoff dong a few times a year (yay!) and have a frustrating infield pop up a few times a year (boo) knowing we still have Bregman next to work an 8 pitch walk like a traditional leadoff guy would ahead of the big lefties. 
 

what do the analytics say about batting your best guy 2nd when you have 6 “best guys”? Meaning maybe other teams put their best guy 2nd because most of the rest of their lineup is trash and they have to do that to take advantage of the 1 or few chances they are going to get for that spot to come up in a meaningful situation. With us, you can spread things out, and have a better chance at crooked number innings more often.

Hopefully that makes sense 

And that’s all said with the guys we have back now. When we were trotting our Dubon, julks, meyers, Maldy, etc because of injuries…that’s a trash lineup and needs any and all help it can get 

Edited by UTexasFight
Just saw the post above mine…Pretty much was slorch just said

  • Replies 37k
  • Views 1.5m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

11 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

i say we go 19-8 and win 96 games.  that should get us where we need to be.

I predicted 96 wins when the season began. A few weeks ago, I was wondering if we could even get to 90. Then, right before this win streak, I said I'd take 94. Even after that spurt, 94 still feels like where we'll end up. And given the way things have gone overall, I'd be more than fine with that. 

I say let Maldonado hit first to get his out out of the way. 

It's basic math.

1 hour ago, TonyTexas said:

The Mariners guaranteed that they’ll be swept by the Mets this weekend . Very reminiscent of the Texans’ letterman jacket debacle. 

 

poster,504x498,f8f8f8-pad,600x600,f8f8f8

watch out y'all... Servais  Gator needs some walking around money. 

Edited by Player

Underrated moment from yesterday's game happened on the curve he threw up and in at Wong that sent Wong spinning out of the way for the ball to hit Maldonado's glove just slightly out of the strike zone.

 

image.thumb.png.6ea322b8c7767df6bd75cbeb5717bbc9.png

31 minutes ago, Gut Wagon said:

I predicted 96 wins when the season began. A few weeks ago, I was wondering if we could even get to 90. Then, right before this win streak, I said I'd take 94. Even after that spurt, 94 still feels like where we'll end up. And given the way things have gone overall, I'd be more than fine with that. 


96 or 97 

 

erection GIF

 

Cleveland claimed both Giolito and Lopez from the Angels

5 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Was anyone picked up ?

 

not by the Astros

 

Fuckin Cleveland got Matt Moore as well. 

12 minutes ago, Gourmand said:

 

Cleveland claimed both Giolito and Lopez from the Angels

That’s awesome.

but makes sense. A team that still has an outside chance and has nothing to lose.

Cleveland at Anaheim for a 4 game set starting next Thursday. That won’t be weird for those guys.

At least Cleveland getting those players is better than Arlington claiming two or three pitchers

Just now, Gourmand said:

At least Cleveland getting those players is better than Arlington claiming two or three pitchers

Arlington could have absolutely used those pitchers. I guess Cleveland came first in the waiver order; not sure how all that works

So all players were picked before it got to the Astros turn? Or the Astros didn’t want anyone? I didn’t know when it’s your turn you get to pick as many as you want and not you get 1 selection if you want someone?

1 hour ago, Player said:

poster,504x498,f8f8f8-pad,600x600,f8f8f8

watch out y'all... Servais  Gator needs some walking around money. 

How does Mix-A-Lot feel about this?

They didn’t go to anyone of consequence and likely not even to playoff teams so no harm done. 

1 minute ago, UTPhil2006 said:

They didn’t go to anyone of consequence and likely not even to playoff teams so no harm done. 


 Correct 

1 hour ago, Huckleberry said:

That's my preferred top 4.

That's fine. I'd be really happy with that too.

Cleveland kept the Twins from getting those guys, because there's an outside chance they can catch them in the division. You only have to pay about 20% of their salary for the rest of the season, so it's not too expensive. Plus they probably saved more than all of that by trading Bell to the Marlins at the deadline. Not a bad play, but it is dumb that a team can claim more than 1 guy at a time, I thought it would be more like a supplemental draft pick situation. 

1 hour ago, henrygandorf said:

back to the lineup - while i agree you put your best hitter 2nd (and would love to see yordan 2), a scorching-hot bregman there certainly doesn't bother me.  he handles the bat well and knows the zone.  in 2018-19 i might've called him our best hitter, and we've seen signs of that resurgence ever since he's been back in the 2-hole.

once again, put the right guys in the lineup and the order doesn't really matter.  a month ago, when envisioning the astros lineup, i never even considered bregman would be raking, along with possibly having a fresh brantley and a pena that has kinda found it?  not to mention altuve partying like it's 2017.  put those guys in with yordan, tuck, chassy, and yainer and yeah, we'll be just fine.

@ boston was supposed to be our roughest series remaining outside the division ones, and we dismantled them.  we blew g3 home vs boston and g1 @ detroit.  we should be on a 9-1 stretch following an embarrassing home sweep vs seattle.  but we're not and that's fine.  the takeaway is that schedules don't matter and never have with this team.  when we're playing well, the opponent isn't an issue.

i say we go 19-8 and win 96 games.  that should get us where we need to be.

I have the over on 87.5 so I'm more in favor of 21-6, but yeah- yours would likely work too.  If that's not good enough to win us the division then tip your cap and get ready to head to Tampa or Baltimore for a best of 3.  Gulp.  

1 hour ago, Gut Wagon said:

I predicted 96 wins when the season began. A few weeks ago, I was wondering if we could even get to 90. Then, right before this win streak, I said I'd take 94. Even after that spurt, 94 still feels like where we'll end up. And given the way things have gone overall, I'd be more than fine with that. 

When we picked the games for the rest of the year I did it with no preconception and landed on 94 as where we'd end up- 1 in front of the M's, 2 in front of the Jays and 3 in front of the Rangers.  

42 minutes ago, texashorne said:

Arlington could have absolutely used those pitchers. I guess Cleveland came first in the waiver order; not sure how all that works

Works in reverse order of the standings as of this morning. Arlington actually had dibs before us thanks to Aroldis Chapman doing Chapman things. 

44 minutes ago, texashorne said:

Arlington could have absolutely used those pitchers. I guess Cleveland came first in the waiver order; not sure how all that works

Really simple process- it goes worst records to best records. You get to claim as many as you want.  Cleveland had like the 12th crack at it and Cincy like the 14th or something like that.  The two non-playoff teams closest to being in the playoffs.

I'm so glad I won't have to see that douchebag Bader chew on that fucking mouth guard this weekend. 

43 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

So all players were picked before it got to the Astros turn? Or the Astros didn’t want anyone? I didn’t know when it’s your turn you get to pick as many as you want and not you get 1 selection if you want someone?

Yes they were all picked by teams with waiver priority over the Astros (and probably every other contending playoff team with pitching/OF needs) EXCEPT for Randall Grichuk. That one surprised me because I thought he'd be claimed.

16 minutes ago, Gourmand said:

Works in reverse order of the standings as of this morning. Arlington actually had dibs before us thanks to Aroldis Chapman doing Chapman things. 

I thought it was based on the standings the day they were released (when we were percentage points worse than the rangers).  So we would gave priority over them but moot point anyway. 

Oh gotcha I was reading this board(stupid I know) claiming the Astros had priorities over teams. Why the fuck would the guardians and reds even pick anyone up? For what?

Do y'all really care what teams that gaggle of spares went to?

1 hour ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

I didn’t know when it’s your turn you get to pick as many as you want and not you get 1 selection if you want someone?

Guys can be put on waivers at any time between the trade deadline and Aug 31, so you have to go through the same process for each individual player.  There isn't always a pool of guys put on waivers all at once.  And the claiming team still has to make room on their 40 man, so that in theory should limit how many players any one team would claim.

If Julks was still on the 26 man, we should have absolutely picked up Grichuk.

6 minutes ago, hornmpa96 said:

If Julks was still on the 26 man, we should have absolutely picked up Grichuk.


who’s faster ?

8 minutes ago, hornmpa96 said:

If Julks was still on the 26 man, we should have absolutely picked up Grichuk.

he was optioned this week 

50 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Oh gotcha I was reading this board(stupid I know) claiming the Astros had priorities over teams. Why the fuck would the guardians and reds even pick anyone up? For what?

Reds are only 1 back of the wild card. 
guardians are 5 back of a pretty leaky Twins team that could go 2-8 at any time. They are both very much in the race still. 

1 minute ago, Gourmand said:

he was optioned this week 

Hence the use of past tense

Grichuk could still be released by the Angels and become a free agent. Would the Astros have any interest in signing him to a deal for injury insurance with Brantley or to replace Jake Meyers?

4 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:


who’s faster ?

That’s a great question - Who will play the Derek Fisher role in this years playoff run?

3 minutes ago, Gourmand said:

Grichuk could still be released by the Angels and become a free agent. Would the Astros have any interest in signing him to a deal for injury insurance with Brantley or to replace Jake Meyers?

He would be insurance for Brantley but I wouldn’t want to give up on Meyers to do it. It doesn’t look like there’s room on the 26 man roster.

20 minutes ago, hornmpa96 said:

If Julks was still on the 26 man, we should have absolutely picked up Grichuk.

He was hitting .168 for the Angels since the trade, which is worse than Maldonado, so no thanks. There's a good reason he cleared waivers.

8 minutes ago, UTPhil2006 said:

Also sounds like Kessinger and RP will be the call ups tomorrow 


mlb better be nervous if grae gets back and goes on a tear !

Edited by tx 3 putt

21 minutes ago, hornmpa96 said:

If Julks was still on the 26 man, we should have absolutely picked up Grichuk.


Canadian Lol GIF

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.