Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Schulz2.0 said:

But also that Flood might be.

I’m a little skeptical that Flood is going anywhere, and I certainly don’t think Sarkisian is going to push for it.  
 

There’s probably an argument here that Flood needs to have more supervision shopping for the groceries than he does baking the cake. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
49 minutes ago, Tex-19 said:

Flood seems to do well with OTs but not with G/C. Maybe they just need an Assistant OL coach to help with the interior

This is what I have been thinking.  We have interior DL coaches and Edge coaches, why not interior OL coaches.  Coaching limits are gone, so maybe it could be a thing.  But I dont know shit about fuck, so it could be a terrible idea.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Gordon Shumway said:

This is what I have been thinking.  We have interior DL coaches and Edge coaches, why not interior OL coaches.  Coaching limits are gone, so maybe it could be a thing.  But I dont know shit about fuck, so it could be a terrible idea.

I think there's too much line coordination that requires a single authority to have different positional coaches (you can certainly add coaches for technique). 

My other thought is that Cole Hudson, Conner Robertson, and probably DJ Campbell are what they are, for better or for worse (in other words, I don't think there's a lot of untapped aptitude that's there to bring out with more coaching).  

I have zero clue, however, why Stroh and Neto appear unplayable.  

Posted
3 hours ago, LCHorn said:

I think there's too much line coordination that requires a single authority to have different positional coaches (you can certainly add coaches for technique). 

My other thought is that Cole Hudson, Conner Robertson, and probably DJ Campbell are what they are, for better or for worse (in other words, I don't think there's a lot of untapped aptitude that's there to bring out with more coaching).  

I have zero clue, however, why Stroh and Neto appear unplayable.  

Coordination makes sense to me. Not that they look too coordinated this year. 

 

 

Posted


Relevant because San Jose St’s offensive line was better than ours when we played them. And it still did not meet the Spartan’s standards. Imagine if Flood is allowed to keep his job. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Newy25 said:


Relevant because San Jose St’s offensive line was better than ours when we played them. And it still did not meet the Spartan’s standards. Imagine if Flood is allowed to keep his job. 

How did SJSU’s OL do against Ohio State? OU? Arkansas? TAMU? 
One game is not an entire season. 

Flood needs to get his shit together, but unless there is a clear upgrade available, we should stand pat. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Is our support staff generally in a good spot now? I’ve been out of recruiting and such due to some health issues, but with Kiffin heading to LSU would we want to try to get Billy Glasscock back? Just a name I recognized in some articles today.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BornAndRaised said:

Is our support staff generally in a good spot now? I’ve been out of recruiting and such due to some health issues, but with Kiffin heading to LSU would we want to try to get Billy Glasscock back? Just a name I recognized in some articles today.

 

 

Hope all is well, bud.  

 

 

 

 

Posted
23 hours ago, Schulz2.0 said:

But also that Flood might be.

The only person being thrown out there by folks who would know as being "definitely" out is Akina. Doesn't mean there won't be other changes, but anyone worried that Akina is coming back should stop worrying about it if they can pull themselves together. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, closetojumping said:

The only person being thrown out there by folks who would know as being "definitely" out is Akina. Doesn't mean there won't be other changes, but anyone worried that Akina is coming back should stop worrying about it if they can pull themselves together. 

Can't wait for people to mention Corey Raymond

  • Haha 1
Posted

Is Akina out because he is old and it was always going to be just a year, or because Sark has performance standards and is evaluating his staff and making hard decisions?

Posted
11 hours ago, closetojumping said:

The only person being thrown out there by folks who would know as being "definitely" out is Akina. Doesn't mean there won't be other changes, but anyone worried that Akina is coming back should stop worrying about it if they can pull themselves together. 


Akina was defacto fired almost as quickly as defensive coach great Larry MacDuff.  That ill conceived experiment in nostalgia cost us the Florida game and 4-5 touchdowns against Georgia. One of the most colossally fucking stupid hires in Texas history.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
On 12/2/2025 at 8:32 AM, Atticus said:

How did SJSU’s OL do against Ohio State? OU? Arkansas? TAMU?


That’s a very weird set of rhetorical questions. For the entire season up until the Vanderbilt game, we had a bottom 10% offensive line in college football. That’s completely unacceptable at Texas. We recruited and evaluated our own roster poorly. Flood is the main reason (along with Akina) we are sitting at home during the playoffs. You have to fire Flood. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


That’s a very weird set of rhetorical questions. For the entire season up until the Vanderbilt game, we had a bottom 10% offensive line in college football. That’s completely unacceptable at Texas. We recruited and evaluated our own roster poorly. Flood is the main reason (along with Akina) we are sitting at home during the playoffs. You have to fire Flood. 

Just playing this out, but do you?  How do you know that Flood didn’t recommend grabbing lineman in the portal last winter and Sarkisian told him that money was getting devoted to DT?


I think if you want to fire Flood it also needs to be because the line got dominated by Georgia in 2024, performed poorly in the Sugarbowl versus Washington, and that was with a Lombardi award winner and other lineman with lots of experience/NFL prospects.  One might say that’s true of any top 5 vs top 5 match-up but it’s evident we aren’t matching the success Alabama’s offense had under Sarkisian and that was the standard presumably when you hired him.  
 

In his favor, the line clearly improved between Florida and A&M.  

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

In his favor, the line clearly improved between Florida and A&M.  

lol wut. That’s not even remotely in his favor.  it took him 8 games to figure out who his best 5 was, not because of a bunch of individual development along the line. 
 

That’s probably the biggest indictment on him. He had no fucking clue who his bets guys were and he tried 4 other options before he lucked into that lineup due to injury. 

Edited by Burt Macklin
Posted
2 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

lol wut. That’s not even remotely in his favor.  it took him 8 games to figure out who his best 5 was, not because of a bunch of individual development along the line. 
 

That’s probably the biggest indictment on him. He had no fucking clue who his bets guys were and he tried 4 other options before he lucked into that lineup due to injury. 

When I say in his favor, it's evidence that he's able to make adjustments that lead to improvement.  

Again, I don't think we have visibility into what was going on in practice.  Why, for example, did it appear Stroh was working?  One of my biggest complaints about the $9.95 coterie is they don't seem to dig into these kinds of questions and I think it's partially because Flood is one of their best sources.  

I'm not trying to defend Flood, I don't care who the coach is as long as they are pancaking defensive lineman and I have a suspicion that a good bit of the under-performance is unrelated to Flood's efficacy as a coach.  

Posted
20 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

Just playing this out, but do you?  How do you know that Flood didn’t recommend grabbing lineman in the portal last winter and Sarkisian told him that money was getting devoted to DT?


I think if you want to fire Flood it also needs to be because the line got dominated by Georgia in 2024, performed poorly in the Sugarbowl versus Washington, and that was with a Lombardi award winner and other lineman with lots of experience/NFL prospects.  One might say that’s true of any top 5 vs top 5 match-up but it’s evident we aren’t matching the success Alabama’s offense had under Sarkisian and that was the standard presumably when you hired him.  
 

In his favor, the line clearly improved between Florida and A&M.  

 

5 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

When I say in his favor, it's evidence that he's able to make adjustments that lead to improvement.  

Again, I don't think we have visibility into what was going on in practice.  Why, for example, did it appear Stroh was working?  One of my biggest complaints about the $9.95 coterie is they don't seem to dig into these kinds of questions and I think it's partially because Flood is one of their best sources.  

I'm not trying to defend Flood, I don't care who the coach is as long as they are pancaking defensive lineman and I have a suspicion that a good bit of the under-performance is unrelated to Flood's efficacy as a coach.  

Whether or not Flood is back is a bit irrelevant to the premise of whether or not he actually did his job this year. The answer to that question is that he did not, and that is a belief held within Belmont and among its benefactors. 

Flood was apparently challenged about using the portal to field his best 5 and he effectively said “my team is on the court (field)” and ended the discussion after last season. His loyalty was not rewarded and it cost Texas. He went late into this season calling Connor fucking Stroh one of his kind of guys. Solid work. That dude is walking and the portal is being used heavily this cycle and none of that is because Kyle Flood has done his job and deserves to continue to draw a salary from Texas. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...