Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, KingBobo81 said:

I was really hoping the scheduling philosophy would change with a new regime…this is gross.

The overall schedule is better, but I think the problem people continue to have is that the "marquee games" are too often being played at neutral sites/tournaments or away. Season ticket holders don't get excited to watch us play UConn and Duke on TV.

We hosted UConn last year and Gonzaga/Creighton like 3 years ago. Outside of that, the marquee non-con games at Moody have been pretty much non-existent.

I also wonder what would get people excited when you have 13 non-con games. You are going to have creampuffs on there. Every team does and those are always at home. If we swapped out Southern for Michigan State, would that one game get people that much more excited? Or are they expecting like 3-4 notable home opponents?

Edited by Hookem2147
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I think Maui will stay because people like tradition and nostalgia, but I see that Players Era tournament overpowering Maui.

And yes, if you swapped Southern for Michigan State people would be excited because Michigan State is a power name in basketball. Now if you swapped Southern for Minnesota, I don't think people would be that much more excited.

I go back and forth if the saying of “no one wants to come play Texas at Texas” still rings true like it does for the Women’s team. Barnes used to say that as well but he had connections and he would get those teams into H/H contracts. 

I’m just still a little peeved that Duke got us again in what seems to be a one-time game basically playing them at a “neutral” (really home) site and we probably won’t get anything in return. 

 

Posted
The overall schedule is better, but I think the problem people continue to have is that the "marquee games" are too often being played at neutral sites/tournaments or away. Season ticket holders don't get excited to watch us play UConn and Duke on TV.
We hosted UConn last year and Gonzaga/Creighton like 3 years ago. Outside of that, the marquee non-con games at Moody have been pretty much non-existent.
I also wonder what would get people excited when you have 13 non-con games. You are going to have creampuffs on there. Every team does and those are always at home. If we swapped out Southern for Michigan State, would that one game get people that much more excited? Or are they expecting like 3-4 notable home opponents?

I think we have probably discussed this ad nauseam, but the philosophy of gaming the NET system by beating the shit out of the worst teams is a terrible fan experience - that is literally the entire home schedule except for the forced matchup with Virginia. A few cream puffs…ok, but at least schedule some teams with a pulse in place of these bottom of the barrel teams.

You should have at least one home marquee non conference matchup (and yes, I would get much more excited) at minimum. It is embarrassing the prices season ticket holders pay for a Nov/Dec schedule like we have had the last two seasons.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

My biggest problem is that we play all of these shitty teams from all over the country at home.  If you are going to play shit teams at least make them local.  UTEP, UTSA, UTA, UNT, Rice, Lamar, Tarleton could all be played in place of all 8 of those home games with little difference in outcome.  Or better yet do some 2 for 1 contracts with inferior teams that would be great travel destinations for the fans.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
56 minutes ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

A little better than ours but we got the Maui

The big thing is that somebody (TV, I guess) is offering up more money to put the game somewhere neutral, for bigger attendance, which means more profit, than a home game. 

Feels like 80% of the time when these big non-conf matchups get announced, it's immediately designated at a neutral site. 

I will give UConn some credit - Hartford is at least close to Storrs (35 min) and Boston and MSG are pretty easy to get to from Connecticut (1.5 hours to Boston and 3.5 to NYC)

Gampel (UConn's home arena) seats 10k
XL is 16k
MSG is 19,500
TD Garden is also 19,500

Tournaments, like Maui, Players Era and Champions Classic, are different, they are almost always somewhere neutral. But the one-off or two-year non-conf matchups are going more and more neutral site. 

Lastly, Moody isn't yet a big name place to play, at least in terms of reputation.  Teams want to play at Allen Fieldhouse, Cameron Indoor, the Dean Smith Center, Rupp, etc. because they are prestigious and hallowed. 

Posted (edited)

No joke we should play an Ivy League team at home every year rather than these random, no-name schools. It would be nice for the local Ivy alumni associations and good for the Texas Exes to have a joint alumni event with them. Penn, Princeton and Harvard have been the bellweather programs in that conference and Cornell has made the Tournament in the past 15 years. The premier public Ivy should play the OG Ivies.

Edited by Macklemore

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...