Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Dahobbs said:

No one wanted Caldwell to take snaps from a functioning Arch.

Yes. They did. 

Y'all want to give me shit for being an Arch Apologist - I'm going to keep tabs. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
Just now, ztejas said:

Yes. They did. 

Y'all want to give me shit for being an Arch Apologist - I'm going to keep tabs. 

No, they didn't. We hadn't seen functioning Arch until today. He was throwing the ball after the first two low throws. Really nice to see. Hopefully he got it out of system. 

Posted
Just now, Dahobbs said:

No, they didn't. We hadn't seen functioning Arch until today. He was throwing the ball after the first two low throws. Really nice to see. Hopefully he got it out of system. 

Brady Bunch Jan GIF by MOODMAN

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Hopefully everyone got it out of their system.  The o line and Stroh still looks like dog shit. But receivers hopefully get their nuts out and start dominating their craft 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Yes I saw the run and am aware of your joke. People absolutely wanted Caldwell to take snaps from Arch. People on this website even claimed Arch was as bad or worse than Garrett Gilbert…

He was playing worse than Gilbert. It doesn't mean he is worse than Gilbert. Y'all are fucking crazy. No one was saying give up on Arch and he couldn't fix the issues and become the player we all hope him to be. So fucking weird to take it that way. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Dahobbs said:

He was playing worse than Gilbert. It doesn't mean he is worse than Gilbert. Y'all are fucking crazy. No one was saying give up on Arch and he couldn't fix the issues and become the player we all hope him to be. So fucking weird to take it that way. 

There’s a poll on this website you’re welcome to reference 

Posted
1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

Clear revisionist history happening.

Not at all. People wanted Caldwell to play if Arch continued to look like hammered dog shit. He didn’t, so now they don’t.

Just now, dr99 said:

she asked two people about it

Oh. What a cunt!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Alpha Phi hasn't had a chick that skinny evar.

Have you seen the Arizona State Alpha Phi IG ???

They must be the black sheep chapter of the nation because…

Spoiler

 

 

IMG_8853.gif.09b972a7a231c9b2fc5b7643fb4a3fad.gif

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

There’s a poll on this website you’re welcome to reference 

Who fucking cares. Jesus fucking Christ watch the game you fucking loser and cheer with everyone else 

Posted
Just now, BurntOrange&White said:

Why are you trying to dunk on people? Arch was playing complete fucking dog shit and couldn't complete a simple pass. 

Because people thought we should play Matthew Caldwell instead of Arch Manning. They made that determination based on having watched zero games of Matthew Caldwell and three games of Arch Manning

Posted
Just now, hobbes2702 said:

Because people thought we should play Matthew Caldwell instead of Arch Manning. They made that determination based on having watched zero games of Matthew Caldwell and three games of Arch Manning

If Arch continue to play like he had been he absolutely should have been playing instead of Arch. Like are you fucking retarded to think we should have kept playing Arch if he couldn't complete simple passes?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

No, they didn't. We hadn't seen functioning Arch until today. He was throwing the ball after the first two low throws. Really nice to see. Hopefully he got it out of system. 

Bro he had 295 yards passing and 5 total TDs week 2. That isn't "functioning"? Week 3 people wanted to see Caldwell.

What point are you trying to make? I told all of you to be patient with this kid. I'm not an "I told you so" guy. I rarely pull receipts. 

That said - I know what people said. No one is changing what's been said already.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, BurntOrange&White said:

If Arch continue to play like he had been he absolutely should have been playing instead of Arch. Like are you fucking retarded to think we should have kept playing Arch if he couldn't complete simple passes?

@ztejas has got the info you need.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Hopefully everyone got it out of their system.  The o line and Stroh still looks like dog shit. But receivers hopefully get their nuts out and start dominating their craft 

This is a weird and unproven hypothesis but I feel like the OL will gain confidence from a confident Arch, the whole fuckin offense in fact. I’m not a professional but have stayed at a bedbug infested Motel 6

Posted
1 hour ago, naija said:

#18 has been our best LB this year

That was a lot of fun when he and Akana both signed up that year. Sark said something a couple of weeks ago about Littleton to the media like, “I don’t know why you are surprised, I mention him almost every day.” Lefau was that guy for his class to a much smaller degree 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...