The Robert Mueller Investigation

[4th&Five 41444]

Imagine if any other president had the performance Dotard had in Helsinki. It was forgotten in a week. 

57 states though...

[lemonlime 5503]

25 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I really think this is more of Putin trolling us through Trump.  It’s just another “in your face haha fuck you America” from Putin.

Imagine if Obama got off the phone with Putin and told the world, “Putin isn’t interested in Ukraine and those little green men invading across the border aren’t Russians.  I know this because Putin told me and I believe him.”

What you're not taking into account is that Obama is black.

[jimmyjazz 45428]

2 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

What you're not taking into account is that Obama is black.

Hell, he's only half black.  You'd think the Republicans would at least give a little credit to the white half for something now and again.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23355]

The whole Mueller Report isn’t getting the attention it deserves but yeah, the parts that all but come out and say Trump is a fucking criminal abusing his power to conceal his crimes does seem newsworthy. 

Edited May 3, 2019 by Hugo Stiglitz

[TtomTerrific 200]

the full, un-redacted report is on display at the Justice Department for Congressmen to come and view.

Exactly 0 Democrats have been by to give it even a cursory read......and only two Republicans.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/mueller-report-redacted-1295105

21 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The whole Mueller Report isn’t getting the attention it deserves

lol......nothing but wall to wall coverage of this nothing burger for 2 years, 24 hours a day ...not to mention your entire life's energy for just that long, and it "isn't getting the attention it deserves"

 

Edited May 3, 2019 by TtomTerrific
pasting link

[kevwun 15572]

Um, no that's a less re-dacted version.  It was not the un-redacted version and the offer was only made to 12 members of congress. Read your own links.

Edited May 3, 2019 by kevwun

[VRHorn 718]

Yeah, Tito'sTom, you don't get to make up your own facts. The version available is still redacted. The Dems are "boycotting" it until they can see the full report and underlying evidence.

[Captainant 27250]

18 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

the full, un-redacted report is on display at the Justice Department for Congressmen to come and view.

Exactly 0 Democrats have been by to give it even a cursory read......and only two Republicans.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/mueller-report-redacted-1295105

lol......nothing but wall to wall coverage of this nothing burger for 2 years, 24 hours a day ...not to mention your entire life's energy for just that long, and it "isn't getting the attention it deserves"

 

The bolded part is directly contradicted by the headline of the article you're referencing. Try harder, or at least post less shitty shitposts.

[bolverk 29261]

Another fun-filled afternoon fishing on Lake Georgetown?

[Anastasis 23329]

 

 

LOL. Way to follow-up there Coop. 

 

Edited May 3, 2019 by Anastasis

[David Dennison 18487]

24 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

the full, un-redacted report is on display at the Justice Department for Congressmen to come and view.

Exactly 0 Democrats have been by to give it even a cursory read......and only two Republicans.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/mueller-report-redacted-1295105

lol......nothing but wall to wall coverage of this nothing burger for 2 years, 24 hours a day ...not to mention your entire life's energy for just that long, and it "isn't getting the attention it deserves"

 

It might help if you actually read the article.

[horncyclist 1384]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/03/us/politics/trump-putin-phone-call.html

Discussed "Russian hoax", McGahns testimony and nothing about Russia's interference or if they would do it again in 2020. So with the SC investigation over, he's just colluding in plain site now. Expect him to roll out the pro Russian policies now that the heats lessening and he thinks he has Barr to protect him.

[David Dennison 18487]

9 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

 

 

LOL. Way to follow-up there Coop. 

 

So, the FBI was doing typical counterintelligence work.

Stop the presses.

[suddenly shaggy 929]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

So, the FBI was doing typical counterintelligence work.

Stop the presses.

Not even counterintelligence, using an undercover agent is routine for police departments all across the country. 

[David Dennison 18487]

2 minutes ago, suddenly shaggy said:

Not even counterintelligence, using an undercover agent is routine for police departments all across the country. 

Bet they didn't even need a FISA warrant to do it.

[jimmyjazz 45428]

7 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

So, the FBI was doing typical counterintelligence work.

Stop the presses.

It's almost as if they're not . . . cops.

[Anastasis 23329]

I think that you guys are missing the point of the time queue on that video.  The author of the NYT piece will not say that she was an FBI agent. He chose the terminology "government investigator" deliberately and refuses to assign her to the FBI. Hmm. I wonder what other type of government investigators might be involved, maybe some that have more leeway when operating on foreign soil. Totallynormalbrains, concentrate for a second and read between the lines.  

[suddenly shaggy 929]

Amazing how on some issues, Anastasis can be tireless in tilting at a windmill and on others completely blind to what's right in front of his face.

It's almost like he's a partisan shitbag pretending to be a non-biased both sider. 

[David Dennison 18487]

4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

I think that you guys are missing the point of the time queue on that video.  The author of the NYT piece will not say that she was an FBI agent. He chose the terminology "government investigator" deliberately and refuses to assign her to the FBI. Hmm. I wonder what other type of government investigators might be involved, maybe some that have more leeway when operating on foreign soil. Totallynormalbrains, concentrate for a second and read between the lines.  

Are you saying the CIA might be involved in a counterintelligence investigation on foreign soil?

Stop the presses.

[TtomTerrific 200]

there we go....personal attacks and complete lack any real interest in this report is the default position of the morons doubling down on this losing proposition, to the further decay of the Democratic Party's chances at ridding the country of Donald Trump.

Taking your lead from your media stooges who won't let it go either, because so much of their emotional psyche was wrapped up in this farce actually working as some sort of salve for their butthurt from Nov 2016 ...you are now Kavanagh-ing Barr, who is actually doing his job and scaring th shit out of you, because he is not on Lynch's tarmac and WILL now investigate the investigators.

The post was in response to the "not enough attention is being given to the Mueller report" idiocy, while it is clear that NO Democrats are interested in that report at all anymore as it doesn't contain shit that they hoped it would.

And to listen to any complaint from them or posters here about "redactions" at all is hilarious from the same crew who LOVED redacted Lois Lerner "investigation" reports and had a fucking parade when Holder flipped off Congress and their "subpoena" to show up and testify.

Ok...." less redacted"....still not interested in reading even that because they know that it won't help their cause at all.  None of this is to verify that our President wasn't a foreign asset, as we were assured here and everywhere....a cause of celebration for any true American....you are crushed that he wasn't....but you knew that all along, you hoped that this two year "investigation" conducted by a political hit squad would turn up something, at least..and to attempt to neuter half of his first term, hoping that it would stop all Executive Branch successes.

You'd think that at least one "outraged Dem" would be at least a little interested in gleaning from the parts that were unredacted.  No.....not one.

Nope, nothing....just that you really, really, really wanted there to be something.  There are some parts still not privy to even Congressmen the private viewing setting.....THAT must be it!...THAT is where the poison pill is! 

Libtards doubling down on a 7-2 off suited and doing the same shit that brought us this Orange headed moron in the first place and doing it again.

Enjoy Barr's look into the folks who weaponized the Justice Department for political gain, "Strock Insurance" or whatever the fuck y'all support as a means of proper governance.

We all suffer, but at least y'all continue to lose and lose and lose.

Well done.

[Dahobbs 17407]

4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

I think that you guys are missing the point of the time queue on that video.  The author of the NYT piece will not say that she was an FBI agent. He chose the terminology "government investigator" deliberately and refuses to assign her to the FBI. Hmm. I wonder what other type of government investigators might be involved, maybe some that have more leeway when operating on foreign soil. Totallynormalbrains, concentrate for a second and read between the lines.  

Not everybody that works for or with the FBI is an agent. Hell, not everybody that does work for the FBI is an actual employee. 

[David Dennison 18487]

1 minute ago, TtomTerrific said:

We all suffer, but at least y'all continue to lose and lose and lose.

Well done.

We won big in November. We'll be in the White House again. We'll control the Senate again. We'll lose the House again.

Rinse, repeat.

[Anastasis 23329]

5 minutes ago, suddenly shaggy said:

Amazing how on some issues, Anastasis can be tireless in tilting at a windmill and on others completely blind to what's right in front of his face.

It's almost like he's a partisan shitbag pretending to be a non-biased both sider.

Totallynormalbrains, I know that ad hominem is the preferred currency of this thread and subforum, but try to concentrate.  If you want my opinion on specific matters that you feel I have insufficiently addressed, ask them and I be more than happy to share my thoughts. In the meantime, try to be best. 

[suddenly shaggy 929]

Just now, Anastasis said:

Totallynormalbrains, I know that ad hominem is the preferred currency of this thread and subforum, but try to concentrate.  If you want my opinion on specific matters that you feel I have insufficiently addressed, ask them and I be more than happy to share my thoughts. In the meantime, try to be best. 

We've all seen enough of your disingenuous bullshit to last us a life time. I'm sure you will continue on, but don't think this board is blind any longer to what you really are. It took some time, but your repeated intellectual dishonesty has been noted.

You should have maybe mixed in a few more gifs and rants against Twitter. 

[BradInATX 9208]

13 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

there we go....personal attacks and complete lack any real interest in this report is the default position of the morons doubling down on this losing proposition, to the further decay of the Democratic Party's chances at ridding the country of Donald Trump.

Taking your lead from your media stooges who won't let it go either, because so much of their emotional psyche was wrapped up in this farce actually working as some sort of salve for their butthurt from Nov 2016 ...you are now Kavanagh-ing Barr, who is actually doing his job and scaring th shit out of you, because he is not on Lynch's tarmac and WILL now investigate the investigators.

The post was in response to the "not enough attention is being given to the Mueller report" idiocy, while it is clear that NO Democrats are interested in that report at all anymore as it doesn't contain shit that they hoped it would.

And to listen to any complaint from them or posters here about "redactions" at all is hilarious from the same crew who LOVED redacted Lois Lerner "investigation" reports and had a fucking parade when Holder flipped off Congress and their "subpoena" to show up and testify.

Ok...." less redacted"....still not interested in reading even that because they know that it won't help their cause at all.  None of this is to verify that our President wasn't a foreign asset, as we were assured here and everywhere....a cause of celebration for any true American....you are crushed that he wasn't....but you knew that all along, you hoped that this two year "investigation" conducted by a political hit squad would turn up something, at least..and to attempt to neuter half of his first term, hoping that it would stop all Executive Branch successes.

You'd think that at least one "outraged Dem" would be at least a little interested in gleaning from the parts that were unredacted.  No.....not one.

Nope, nothing....just that you really, really, really wanted there to be something.  There are some parts still not privy to even Congressmen the private viewing setting.....THAT must be it!...THAT is where the poison pill is! 

Libtards doubling down on a 7-2 off suited and doing the same shit that brought us this Orange headed moron in the first place and doing it again.

Enjoy Barr's look into the folks who weaponized the Justice Department for political gain, "Strock Insurance" or whatever the fuck y'all support as a means of proper governance.

We all suffer, but at least y'all continue to lose and lose and lose.

Well done.

There is literally a zero percent chance you have read the entire report.

[Anastasis 23329]

6 minutes ago, suddenly shaggy said:

We've all seen enough of your disingenuous bullshit to last us a life time. I'm sure you will continue on, but don't think this board is blind any longer to what you really are. It took some time, but your repeated intellectual dishonesty has been noted.

You should have maybe mixed in a few more gifs and rants against Twitter. 

Ahh, pout more. Preferably with original material next time. 

 

And for the record I think that all injections of some 90s hip hop videos to the "discourse" here elevates this thread. 

[suddenly shaggy 929]

11 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Ahh, pout more. Preferably with original material next time. 

You are currently gaslighting this thread by accusing me of plagiarism. At least you are consistent. 

[Anastasis 23329]

2 minutes ago, suddenly shaggy said:

You are currently gaslighting this thread by accusing me of plagiarism. At least you are consistent. 

 

[elguapo 4577]

4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

 

 

[Jim Tom Pinch 120]

2 hours ago, Pig Bellmont said:

That’s a pretty big error, but speaks to our times that it’s also totally believable 

Actually, all it speaks to is shitty journalism and the derangement of the Liberal Trash in this country.

[jimmyjazz 45428]

46 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

there we go....personal attacks and complete lack any real interest in this report is the default position of the morons doubling down on this losing proposition, to the further decay of the Democratic Party's chances at ridding the country of Donald Trump.

Taking your lead from your media stooges who won't let it go either, because so much of their emotional psyche was wrapped up in this farce actually working as some sort of salve for their butthurt from Nov 2016 ...you are now Kavanagh-ing Barr, who is actually doing his job and scaring th shit out of you, because he is not on Lynch's tarmac and WILL now investigate the investigators.

The post was in response to the "not enough attention is being given to the Mueller report" idiocy, while it is clear that NO Democrats are interested in that report at all anymore as it doesn't contain shit that they hoped it would.

And to listen to any complaint from them or posters here about "redactions" at all is hilarious from the same crew who LOVED redacted Lois Lerner "investigation" reports and had a fucking parade when Holder flipped off Congress and their "subpoena" to show up and testify.

Ok...." less redacted"....still not interested in reading even that because they know that it won't help their cause at all.  None of this is to verify that our President wasn't a foreign asset, as we were assured here and everywhere....a cause of celebration for any true American....you are crushed that he wasn't....but you knew that all along, you hoped that this two year "investigation" conducted by a political hit squad would turn up something, at least..and to attempt to neuter half of his first term, hoping that it would stop all Executive Branch successes.

You'd think that at least one "outraged Dem" would be at least a little interested in gleaning from the parts that were unredacted.  No.....not one.

Nope, nothing....just that you really, really, really wanted there to be something.  There are some parts still not privy to even Congressmen the private viewing setting.....THAT must be it!...THAT is where the poison pill is! 

Libtards doubling down on a 7-2 off suited and doing the same shit that brought us this Orange headed moron in the first place and doing it again.

Enjoy Barr's look into the folks who weaponized the Justice Department for political gain, "Strock Insurance" or whatever the fuck y'all support as a means of proper governance.

We all suffer, but at least y'all continue to lose and lose and lose.

Well done.

 

[Foosters 17688]

53 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

there we go....personal attacks and complete lack any real interest in this report is the default position of the morons doubling down on this losing proposition, to the further decay of the Democratic Party's chances at ridding the country of Donald Trump.

Taking your lead from your media stooges who won't let it go either, because so much of their emotional psyche was wrapped up in this farce actually working as some sort of salve for their butthurt from Nov 2016 ...you are now Kavanagh-ing Barr, who is actually doing his job and scaring th shit out of you, because he is not on Lynch's tarmac and WILL now investigate the investigators.

The post was in response to the "not enough attention is being given to the Mueller report" idiocy, while it is clear that NO Democrats are interested in that report at all anymore as it doesn't contain shit that they hoped it would.

And to listen to any complaint from them or posters here about "redactions" at all is hilarious from the same crew who LOVED redacted Lois Lerner "investigation" reports and had a fucking parade when Holder flipped off Congress and their "subpoena" to show up and testify.

Ok...." less redacted"....still not interested in reading even that because they know that it won't help their cause at all.  None of this is to verify that our President wasn't a foreign asset, as we were assured here and everywhere....a cause of celebration for any true American....you are crushed that he wasn't....but you knew that all along, you hoped that this two year "investigation" conducted by a political hit squad would turn up something, at least..and to attempt to neuter half of his first term, hoping that it would stop all Executive Branch successes.

You'd think that at least one "outraged Dem" would be at least a little interested in gleaning from the parts that were unredacted.  No.....not one.

Nope, nothing....just that you really, really, really wanted there to be something.  There are some parts still not privy to even Congressmen the private viewing setting.....THAT must be it!...THAT is where the poison pill is! 

Libtards doubling down on a 7-2 off suited and doing the same shit that brought us this Orange headed moron in the first place and doing it again.

Enjoy Barr's look into the folks who weaponized the Justice Department for political gain, "Strock Insurance" or whatever the fuck y'all support as a means of proper governance.

We all suffer, but at least y'all continue to lose and lose and lose.

Well done.

Sir, this is a Specs.

 

Oh, hi Tom.

[Anastasis 23329]

18 minutes ago, elguapo said:

 

Need to mix it up, topical to the thread of course.

 

 

Edited May 3, 2019 by Anastasis

[Hugo Stiglitz 23355]

Trump:  “Hey Emperor Hirohito, we just got this report back on an attack at Pearl Harbor (Hirohito smiles).  What do you think about it?”

Hirohito:  “Turns out it was a mountain that turned into a mouse. We should move on.”

Trump: “I agree.”

Edited May 3, 2019 by Hugo Stiglitz

[EuroHorn 3204]

did you furlough triplehorn, Hugo?

[Hugo Stiglitz 23355]

Russian state-TV viewers on Thursday were delivered a different conclusion from Robert Mueller’s report: Putin always wins. And now everyday Russians are going to win, too.

In the rest of the world, the Justice Department’s redacted version of the special counsel’s report concluded Moscow interfered in the 2016 presidential election “in sweeping and systematic fashion.” He identified numerous links between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, establishing that “the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

On Friday, the Kremlin issued a scathing response, feigning disappointment with the investigation’s quality, questioning whether it was a waste of taxpayers’ money, and falsely claiming the report doesn’t contain “a single piece of evidence” of Russian intervention in 2016.

Willfully ignoring Mueller’s conclusions, Russian government officials appeared greatly encouraged by the lack of further indictments stemming from the investigation. Parroting President Trump’s narrative, state-media outlet RT on Thursday posted the link to Mueller’s report, prefaced by: “SPOILER ALERT: No ‘collusion’” “Collusion” has no legal definition and is not a federal crime—therefore, the Mueller report did not make a determination on “collusion.”

Unburdened by the facts, Russian state-TV hosts and experts were happy to repeat Trump’s mantra—“No collusion, no obstruction”—throughout the investigation.

They seem further emboldened by the recent visit by Fiona Hill, a Trump adviser who held talks in Moscow on April 17 with several Russian officials. U.S. Special Envoy on North KoreaSteven Biegun is also in Moscow this week, ahead of the upcoming meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Vladimir Soloviev, host of Russian state-TV shows Moscow. Kremlin. Putin and The Evening, proudly surmised that Americans can’t solve any problems without Moscow, and are “wavering”and ready to talk. The host and experts jointly concluded that Trump’s hands seem to be untied, because the Mueller investigation’s ending has opened a new era of diplomatic relations between the White House and the Kremlin.

Collusion and obstruction denials aside, there were begrudging acknowledgments that the Mueller report did indeed confirm Moscow’s campaign of election interference.

Nevertheless, Kremlin-controlled state media on Thursday was encouraging its audiences with the notion that economic sanctions have now been exhausted and will soon be replaced with conciliatory gestures. Average Russians are being sold on the idea that Putin’s long-term strategy is bound to pay off. According to the Russian state TV, Putin always wins—even when he loses.

That trusty narrative also surfaced in the special counsel’s investigation.

Heavily redacted sections of Mueller’s report revealed that “at approximately 2:40 a.m. on Nov. 9, 2016, news reports stated that candidate Clinton had called President-elect Trump to concede,” prompting an unnamed individual, who traveled to New York alongside the Kremlin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov, to send a message to the CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), Kirill Dmitriev. The message was simple: “Putin has won.”

This line of thinking wasn’t limited to communications taking place behind the scenes. In recent years, Russian state media has made a habit out of boasting about the Kremlin’s successful influence operation, brazenly asserting “Trump is ours,” mocking the American intelligence community for sleeping “while Russia elected a new U.S. president,” and joking that U.S. lawmakers traveled to Russia “to make deals with our hackers so they can rig the midterms in favor of Trump’s team.” In line with Trump’s “locker-room talk” explanations, the Kremlin’s mouthpieces have consistently claimed these statements are meant only as jokes or sarcasm. In reality, they represent a thinly veiled pride at the reach and success of Russia’s ongoing info-ops against the U.S.Experts say a coordinated online disinformation campaign targeting 2020 elections is already underway, using techniques developed and refined by the Kremlin during the U.S. presidential elections in 2016.

Evgeny Popov, the host of 60 Minutes, the most popular state TV program in Russia as of 2018, is defiant about the findings in the Mueller report. Popov tells me: “Soon, we will help you elect Trump once again. Just like the last time. Get ready!”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/russian-state-tv-spins-mueller-report-if-putin-did-it-he-did-it-for-you

[GW Hayduke 1949]

Quality podcast. First 10 minutes is a rather scathing take on Barr's current reputation and how he handled Mueller.  

https://www.lawfareblog.com/rational-security-eating-your-soul-small-bites-edition

[Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand 13530]

The party that wants Mueller to testify has no interest in the Mueller Report. Just like before the last presidential election. And that makes the personal responsibility folks vote for Trump!

 

Way to go Democrats! 😣

[ChickenSandwich 9795]

23 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

The party that wants Mueller to testify has no interest in the Mueller Report. Just like before the last presidential election. And that makes the personal responsibility folks vote for Trump!

 

Way to go Democrats! 😣

Man. If only this new found hate of corrupting an election was around when the DNC rigged the Dem primary for Hillary over poor Bernie. Funny, we don’t hear any outrage about real election tampering, not a hoax or Facebook adds. 

Huh

[jimmyjazz 45428]

5 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Man. If only this new found hate of corrupting an election was around when the DNC rigged the Dem primary for Hillary over poor Bernie. Funny, we don’t hear any outrage about real election tampering, not a hoax or Facebook adds. 

Huh

Hey look, you're still ignorant.  Tell me . . . what makes a political party a democracy?  Oh, nothing? 

Do you know anything about history?  Do you know how party candidates used to be picked?

Bernie Sanders isn't even a fucking Democrat.  

[hobbes2702 12769]

7 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Man. If only this new found hate of corrupting an election was around when the DNC rigged the Dem primary for Hillary over poor Bernie. Funny, we don’t hear any outrage about real election tampering, not a hoax or Facebook adds. 

Huh

Oh please tell us how they rigged it? This is always my favorite 

[hobbes2702 12769]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

Hey look, you're still ignorant.  Tell me . . . what makes a political party a democracy?  Oh, nothing? 

Do you know anything about history?  Do you know how party candidates used to be picked?

Bernie Sanders isn't even a fucking Democrat.  

Better yet, how was it rigged?

[jimmyjazz 45428]

Just now, hobbes2702 said:

Better yet, how was it rigged?

Well, see, they counted votes, and Hillary had more, and . . . damn.

[Born to Run 6420]

Actually, all it speaks to is shitty journalism and the derangement of the Liberal Trash in this country.

Ah yes, liberal trash immediately retracted and corrected an error. And shockingly these mistakes happen every few months. That = trash.

Fox, Rush spout absolute fiction 24/7 daily and it’s never corrected, retracted no matter how egregious. Dittos man

[Anastasis 23329]

I have a hankering for a light hearted 80s cold war comedy.  Any suggestions?  Options at this point are:

 

 

OR

 

 

 

[Guest]

16 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Well, see, they counted votes, and Hillary had more, and . . . damn.

with 200 year old rules...

 

Guess they saw it coming.

Edited May 3, 2019 by slorch

[JimmyJames 12271]

3 hours ago, TtomTerrific said:

the full, un-redacted report is on display at the Justice Department for Congressmen to come and view.

Exactly 0 Democrats have been by to give it even a cursory read......and only two Republicans.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/mueller-report-redacted-1295105

lol......nothing but wall to wall coverage of this nothing burger for 2 years, 24 hours a day ...not to mention your entire life's energy for just that long, and it "isn't getting the attention it deserves"

 

This sounds like a complete lie. Given the poster, I’m assuming it is a lie.

[Anastasis 23329]

Nevermind.  What am I thinking. 

 

[JimmyJames 12271]

2 hours ago, TtomTerrific said:

there we go....personal attacks and complete lack any real interest in this report is the default position of the morons doubling down on this losing proposition, to the further decay of the Democratic Party's chances at ridding the country of Donald Trump.

Taking your lead from your media stooges who won't let it go either, because so much of their emotional psyche was wrapped up in this farce actually working as some sort of salve for their butthurt from Nov 2016 ...you are now Kavanagh-ing Barr, who is actually doing his job and scaring th shit out of you, because he is not on Lynch's tarmac and WILL now investigate the investigators.

The post was in response to the "not enough attention is being given to the Mueller report" idiocy, while it is clear that NO Democrats are interested in that report at all anymore as it doesn't contain shit that they hoped it would.

And to listen to any complaint from them or posters here about "redactions" at all is hilarious from the same crew who LOVED redacted Lois Lerner "investigation" reports and had a fucking parade when Holder flipped off Congress and their "subpoena" to show up and testify.

Ok...." less redacted"....still not interested in reading even that because they know that it won't help their cause at all.  None of this is to verify that our President wasn't a foreign asset, as we were assured here and everywhere....a cause of celebration for any true American....you are crushed that he wasn't....but you knew that all along, you hoped that this two year "investigation" conducted by a political hit squad would turn up something, at least..and to attempt to neuter half of his first term, hoping that it would stop all Executive Branch successes.

You'd think that at least one "outraged Dem" would be at least a little interested in gleaning from the parts that were unredacted.  No.....not one.

Nope, nothing....just that you really, really, really wanted there to be something.  There are some parts still not privy to even Congressmen the private viewing setting.....THAT must be it!...THAT is where the poison pill is! 

Libtards doubling down on a 7-2 off suited and doing the same shit that brought us this Orange headed moron in the first place and doing it again.

Enjoy Barr's look into the folks who weaponized the Justice Department for political gain, "Strock Insurance" or whatever the fuck y'all support as a means of proper governance.

We all suffer, but at least y'all continue to lose and lose and lose.

Well done.

So. Now you’re claiming “less redacted” is the same thing as “unredacted.”

Your credibility is shot here troll. Go troll somewhere else where it might have some effect. You’re wasting your time.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23355]

I still can’t get over our AG said the president could stop any lawful investigation into him if the president deemed it unfair.