Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

City was kind enough to remove 90% of one of the two east bound lanes of Far West between Doss Elementary and Murchison Middle School, and install some sort of parking mess.  Can't wait until school starts for the true cluster fuck this will be.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

The amount of roads and/or lanes going down major thoroughfares that are closed or intermittently blocked off right now is fucking preposterous. This city is ran by a bunch of nutless monkeys. And half of it is stupid, unnecessary lane "improvements" that fix nothing except giving everyone more curbs to run into.

The other half is construction closures so we can build more $1800 studio apartments for dickheads from Whiteville, USA to move into. 

Edited by ztejas
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I'm loving the "we need to make the pools more affordable, cap the entry fees or make them free" all while passing every tax increase possible without sending it to a vote.  Why do we let fucktards like Zo run the city?!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, PvilleStang said:

I'm loving the "we need to make the pools more affordable, cap the entry fees or make them free" all while passing every tax increase possible without sending it to a vote.  Why do we let fucktards like Zo run the city?!

Hey man, taxes are going to go up until we make this place affordable ... it's simple math.

When I was younger I thought that the city government really thought about this stuff and did the best they could to keep the place going.  Now that I am older I am more cynical.  It seems like there are thousands of groups that want to "do something" that in their worldview will improve the city, so they lobby the council, donate money to a politician, or get someone elected.  They use this influence to fund their pet projects.  This times a thousand causes budget bloat, and here we are.

Each taxing authority says "we are just raising our rate a tiny bit, it's only a small increase when you look at your overall tax burden" or presents the tax rate increase as the increase, ignoring the idea that property tax valuations are also increasing faster than inflation, and your tax bill is your tax rate times your valuation.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, Texas Jeff said:

Hey man, taxes are going to go up until we make this place affordable ... it's simple math.

When I was younger I thought that the city government really thought about this stuff and did the best they could to keep the place going.  Now that I am older I am more cynical.  It seems like there are thousands of groups that want to "do something" that in their worldview will improve the city, so they lobby the council, donate money to a politician, or get someone elected.  They use this influence to fund their pet projects.  This times a thousand causes budget bloat, and here we are.

Each taxing authority says "we are just raising our rate a tiny bit, it's only a small increase when you look at your overall tax burden" or presents the tax rate increase as the increase, ignoring the idea that property tax valuations are also increasing faster than inflation, and your tax bill is your tax rate times your valuation.

Taxes going up due to Appraisals is one thing, but increasing tax RATES to their max allowed yearly is fucking everyone even when the home values come back down.  This is how the city and county get you twice, they raise appraisals AND rates simultaneously.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Texas Jeff said:

Hey man, taxes are going to go up until we make this place affordable ... it's simple math.

When I was younger I thought that the city government really thought about this stuff and did the best they could to keep the place going.  Now that I am older I am more cynical.  It seems like there are thousands of groups that want to "do something" that in their worldview will improve the city, so they lobby the council, donate money to a politician, or get someone elected.  They use this influence to fund their pet projects.  This times a thousand causes budget bloat, and here we are.

Each taxing authority says "we are just raising our rate a tiny bit, it's only a small increase when you look at your overall tax burden" or presents the tax rate increase as the increase, ignoring the idea that property tax valuations are also increasing faster than inflation, and your tax bill is your tax rate times your valuation.

 

1 hour ago, PvilleStang said:

Taxes going up due to Appraisals is one thing, but increasing tax RATES to their max allowed yearly is fucking everyone even when the home values come back down.  This is how the city and county get you twice, they raise appraisals AND rates simultaneously.

Property tax RATES in Austin seem pretty fucking reasonable in comparison to the other big cities and the local area.

  • In 2023, the property tax rate for the City of Austin was less than all its big city peers in Texas and is in the middle of the pack when it comes to Austin and its immediate surrounding suburbs.
  • Travis County's rate was a bit high compared to the core counties of other major metros, but it was the lowest in the local area.
  • Austin ISD has lower rates than all big city ones and its local suburban competitors.

image.png.c0f29a0798aba0686d87f0d2cdfc454c.png

 

Cumulatively, Austin homeowners pay the lowest rates of the bunch when combining City, County, and ISD together. Of course, there are other special districts that can also add up, but the "core rate" in Austin looks pretty damn good.

image.png.9d38fa7040a9fce73f913018d3753cf8.png

All data pulled from here: https://comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/property-tax/rates/

 

Of course, home valuations are another beast. We like them high when it's time to sell, but that naturally sucks when buying or maintaining a residence. Given that more than half of your property taxes from the core entities go to school districts, maybe we ought to reconsider how funding is collected, formulated, and allocated by the STATE.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
9 minutes ago, bolverk said:

 

Property tax RATES in Austin seem pretty fucking reasonable in comparison to the other big cities and the local area.

  • In 2023, the property tax rate for the City of Austin was less than all its big city peers in Texas and is in the middle of the pack when it comes to Austin and its immediate surrounding suburbs.
  • Travis County's rate was a bit high compared to the core counties of other major metros, but it was the lowest in the local area.
  • Austin ISD has lower rates than all big city ones and its local suburban competitors.

image.png.c0f29a0798aba0686d87f0d2cdfc454c.png

 

Cumulatively, Austin homeowners pay the lowest rates of the bunch when combining City, County, and ISD together. Of course, there are other special districts that can also add up, but the "core rate" in Austin looks pretty damn good.

image.png.9d38fa7040a9fce73f913018d3753cf8.png

All data pulled from here: https://comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/property-tax/rates/

 

Of course, home valuations are another beast. We like them high when it's time to sell, but that naturally sucks when buying or maintaining a residence. Given that more than half of your property taxes from the core entities go to school districts, maybe we ought to reconsider how funding is collected, formulated, and allocated by the STATE.

Now factor in MUDs and utilities.  Some areas pay MUD taxes and pay small utility bills, while others have low MUD taxes but pay a premium for those same services.  Austin Energy / Water is another HUGE piece of that puzzle, as seen here:

 

Image

Posted
1 hour ago, PvilleStang said:

Now factor in MUDs and utilities.  Some areas pay MUD taxes and pay small utility bills, while others have low MUD taxes but pay a premium for those same services.  Austin Energy / Water is another HUGE piece of that puzzle, as seen here:

 

Image

i would like to know who...based on that image...is paying only $1,969 in property taxes anywhere near central texas in 2025.

that may be the stupidest thing i have seen in my life.

Posted
30 minutes ago, sidis said:

i would like to know who...based on that image...is paying only $1,969 in property taxes anywhere near central texas in 2025.

that may be the stupidest thing i have seen in my life.

It's the City of Austin portion of your property taxes.  which is roughly 1/5 of your annual property taxes.  Leave it to city of Austin to try and distort the damages done to the property owner.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

bUt thEy deFunDIng ThuH PoLIcE!!?!

Sorry... had to point it out because idiots keep repeating this completely inaccurate line

AUSTIN, Texas — Wednesday afternoon, Austin City Council heard public comments about the proposed $5.9 billion city budget.

Earlier, members looked closer at what is in the budget – including the Austin police budget proposal, set at $496 million, an increase of about $18 million.

This comes as the city narrows its search for a new permanent police chief.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, PvilleStang said:

It's the City of Austin portion of your property taxes.  which is roughly 1/5 of your annual property taxes.  Leave it to city of Austin to try and distort the damages done to the property owner.

duh, my bad.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 hours ago, PvilleStang said:

Now factor in MUDs and utilities.  Some areas pay MUD taxes and pay small utility bills, while others have low MUD taxes but pay a premium for those same services.  Austin Energy / Water is another HUGE piece of that puzzle, as seen here:

I'm not going to try to add up all the various fees for water/wastewater, electricity, and all the other annual fees for all the other big cities and Austin's suburbs. I did check out the water alone (no wastewater) and it looks like Austin is more on that end. As for MUDs, that's an entirely different beast since they're under different governance and, really, it's on you if you choose to live in one.

The following annual water rates were calculated based on a 5/8 inch residential water meter with usage at 8,000 gallons per month, so, yeah, Austin's more expensive than all the others on water (Houston is in the ballpark).

AUSTIN: $1017.22 per year
https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Water/Rates/ResidentialPublicRates_2024.pdf

HOUSTON: $936.12
https://www.houstonwaterbills.houstontx.gov/ProdDP/CalculateConsumptionrate/CalculateConsumptionrate

FORT WORTH: $562.92
https://www.fortworthtexas.gov/departments/water/rates#:~:text=Wastewater Volume Rates-,Volume rates are per 100 cubic feet.,3-inch

SAN ANTONIO: $399.72
https://www.saws.org/service/water-sewer-rates/residential-water-service/

DALLAS: $380.04 per year
https://dallascityhall.com/departments/waterutilities/Pages/dallas-water-calculator.aspx

 

Posted
On 8/14/2024 at 8:06 PM, ztejas said:

The amount of roads and/or lanes going down major thoroughfares that are closed or intermittently blocked off right now is fucking preposterous. This city is ran by a bunch of nutless monkeys. And half of it is stupid, unnecessary lane "improvements" that fix nothing except giving everyone more curbs to run into.

The other half is construction closures so we can build more $1800 studio apartments for dickheads from Whiteville, USA to move into. 

I swear the city waits until August to do most road construction projects.

Posted
13 hours ago, drt said:

Why the fuck is San Antonio that low when they have more water scarcity problems than Austin?

Right?  And why is Houston so high since they have so much water (but maybe because it is all polluted)

Posted (edited)

You also have to factor population density and topography

Lower density equals more pipes in the ground equals more maintenance.

More terrain elevation means more pumping. More rocky terrain equals higher cost to install.

Another interesting thing to look at would be the amount each utility is required to transfer to their respective City General Fund. I think Austin Water is required by Council to transfer like $60M a year to the General Fund. AE is sending like $150M/year to the General Fund.

And lastly, just good 'ol fashion government stupidity and graft.

Edited by Orange&White
  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, crash_davis said:

Recapture is a hot topic as AISD will be asking for more money. But wait....the extra tax money will also be subject to recapture. Watch the video.

Fuck this state. Fuck Hotwheels Abbott for trying to ruin public education.

https://www.kvue.com/article/news/education/schools/texas-recapture-austin-isd-school-funding/269-e064acdd-3bcf-4455-b628-ca56d2066dae

 

AISD just need to convince Abbott, Paxton, and Patrick that they will teach the kids that all women are whores, and offer up 5th grade boys to Dan Patrick for his sexual fantasies in order to keep their money. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, crash_davis said:

Recapture is a hot topic as AISD will be asking for more money. But wait....the extra tax money will also be subject to recapture. Watch the video.

Fuck this state. Fuck Hotwheels Abbott for trying to ruin public education.

https://www.kvue.com/article/news/education/schools/texas-recapture-austin-isd-school-funding/269-e064acdd-3bcf-4455-b628-ca56d2066dae

 

Not an Abbott fan, but serious question /nocr how does he control recapture, I thought that was required due to a court ruling a while back? Is it the implementation over it or something I’m missing?

Edited by TKthunder2
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, TKthunder2 said:

Not an Abbott fan, but serious question /no r how does he control recapture, I thought that was required due to a court ruling a while back? Is it the implementation over it or something I’m missing?

The state doesn't know where the excess recapture money goes. It goes into the general fund so it can get spent anywhere.

There's a $4.5B school funding bill already passed in the lege. Hotwheels won't sign it because he wants vouchers included, you know, gut public schools.

Edited by crash_davis
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Deej said:

Gotta make sure only the white kids get educated. 

It's worse. He and the other idiots want taxpayers to pay for religious schools which can teach a 6000 yr old Earth, dinos didn't exist, women are baby factories subservient to men, and all kinds of bullshit. If you want to your dipshit kids to learn that bullshit, it's your prerogative. Just don't expect me to pay for that bullshit. Oh and take money away from public schools while they are at it.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
13 hours ago, crash_davis said:

Recapture is a hot topic as AISD will be asking for more money. But wait....the extra tax money will also be subject to recapture. Watch the video.

Fuck this state. Fuck Hotwheels Abbott for trying to ruin public education.

https://www.kvue.com/article/news/education/schools/texas-recapture-austin-isd-school-funding/269-e064acdd-3bcf-4455-b628-ca56d2066dae

 

Dude, you realize the DEMS are the ones that passed recapture when they last controlled the lege?  Fuck off with that CR bullshit.

No one in their right mind wants to touch it because it's political suicide to try and rebalance the recapture.  La Joya et al is sucking the coffers dry while Austin is going in dry on every property tax payer.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/aisd-points-to-20m-water-park-as-proof-robin-hood-formula-doesnt-work/

Posted
Dude, you realize the DEMS are the ones that passed recapture when they last controlled the lege?  Fuck off with that CR bullshit.

No one in their right mind wants to touch it because it's political suicide to try and rebalance the recapture.  La Joya et al is sucking the coffers dry while Austin is going in dry on every property tax payer.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/aisd-points-to-20m-water-park-as-proof-robin-hood-formula-doesnt-work/

The initial legislation was necessary due to massive inequity. That the formulas havent been adjusted in any meaningful way is absurd. More than districts being flush (most arent), the recapture excesses just sit in the general fund, then go to the rainy day fund.

Post less.
  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
11 hours ago, TKthunder2 said:

Not an Abbott fan, but serious question /nocr how does he control recapture, I thought that was required due to a court ruling a while back? Is it the implementation over it or something I’m missing?

He and the lege control it.

The state sets a value of wealth per child for each district.  It can be anything they want it to be.  School property tax on wealth above that value is "recaptured", i.e. sent to the state.  School districts have some other options other than doing this, things like merging with another poorer district, but most choose to write a check.  Lower the wealth per child or lower property tax rates and "recapture" goes down, meaning the amount sent to the state from the local property tax payer.

The state sets the amount of money a school receives per child.  It can be anything they want it to be.  If the school district does not raise enough money to cover that amount, the state covers the rest.  In theory this comes from the "recapture" fund, but in reality the state just cuts them a check.  Raise the amount of money a school receives per child and school funding goes up.  Lower it and it goes down.  Keep it it same during times of high inflation (and that is what we are doing now) and school funding goes down  ... inflation eats it away.

Right now, these amounts are set such that the state is collecting more money than they are distributing, so the excess recapture money goes to the general fund.  This general fund can be used for whatever the state wants.

The lege can pass legislation to change this but they need the governor also pass it, and he's not doing that.  He wants private vouchers to funnel public tax money into private schools.

In 2016, some school districts sued the state saying that this was bullshit.  They won.  It was appealed to the Texas State Supreme Court.  The court said no.   The court said that things were screwed up, but everyone was at the wrong venue.  The said everyone needed to work through this in the lege, don't take this to the courts.

And eight years later the lege and the governor are draining public education through inflation and inaction while building up the general fund for whatever.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
14 hours ago, crash_davis said:

Recapture is a hot topic as AISD will be asking for more money. But wait....the extra tax money will also be subject to recapture. Watch the video.

This will be a tough year for Austin ISD.  IMHO they have a top notch superintendent and the people implementing the bond that I have met have been fantastic.  Hopefully they are up to it.

In November, Austin voters will be asked to raise AISD taxes.  The new tax will raise about $170 million.  About $40 million will stay in the school district.  The other $130 million will go to the state.  Of the $170 million, about $17 million will go to teacher raises.  It's a difficult decision and I think it's reasonable to vote either way on this.

At the same time, the district will be considering cuts.  They have a goal of cutting about $78 million over two years to get to a balanced budget.  Last year they gave staff raises without new revenue to support the raises, which created a deficit budget.  They were using savings to cover this deficit, but the savings fund is now down to the lowest amount they must keep.  They have to get back to a balanced budget.

They are going to start working through cuts this fall, which may include school closures and cutting programs.  Trustees don't get elected to cut stuff, and many on the current board were elected on the heels of the last effort to close underutilized schools.  The community is going to pressure the trustees to cut someone else's program or school.

All of this is occurring with the school district under a state monitor for special education issues, which has the board under state guardrails for how they can behave.

Posted
1 hour ago, PvilleStang said:

Dude, you realize the DEMS are the ones that passed recapture when they last controlled the lege?  Fuck off with that CR bullshit.

No one in their right mind wants to touch it because it's political suicide to try and rebalance the recapture.  La Joya et al is sucking the coffers dry while Austin is going in dry on every property tax payer.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/aisd-points-to-20m-water-park-as-proof-robin-hood-formula-doesnt-work/

Imagine thinking Dems control things these days in the state.  Who cares who passed it.  Republicans have the power to fix it and they have Z E R O interest in doing anything that is in the best interests of the state.  It is all about grift, power and owning the libs.

No CR, of course.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Texas Jeff said:

This will be a tough year for Austin ISD.  IMHO they have a top notch superintendent and the people implementing the bond that I have met have been fantastic.  Hopefully they are up to it.

In November, Austin voters will be asked to raise AISD taxes.  The new tax will raise about $170 million.  About $40 million will stay in the school district.  The other $130 million will go to the state.  Of the $170 million, about $17 million will go to teacher raises.  It's a difficult decision and I think it's reasonable to vote either way on this.

At the same time, the district will be considering cuts.  They have a goal of cutting about $78 million over two years to get to a balanced budget.  Last year they gave staff raises without new revenue to support the raises, which created a deficit budget.  They were using savings to cover this deficit, but the savings fund is now down to the lowest amount they must keep.  They have to get back to a balanced budget.

They are going to start working through cuts this fall, which may include school closures and cutting programs.  Trustees don't get elected to cut stuff, and many on the current board were elected on the heels of the last effort to close underutilized schools.  The community is going to pressure the trustees to cut someone else's program or school.

All of this is occurring with the school district under a state monitor for special education issues, which has the board under state guardrails for how they can behave.

The bullshit is affecting tons of school districts. It's like the state leaders want the dumbest fucking population possible, as long as we pay for religious schools, sorry I meant vouchers.

I imagine this article applies to many school districts across the state.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/most-central-texas-school-districts-face-budget-shortfalls/

Posted

Charter school design magnifies the recapture because they are 100% state funded.  When kids drop out of public schools to attend a charter school, the wealthy district per student amount increases (recapture does in turn).  

Sadly though polls are now showing majority of Texans (almost 2/3) want vouchers, including majority of Repubs, Independents and also Dems... j

Posted
17 hours ago, crash_davis said:

Per reddit, supposedly ABIA around Delta terminals are w/o power.

 

16 hours ago, BrazilHorn said:

Hopefully cleared up by tomorrow. Headed to Minneapolis

My wife is there now and says it is super empty and took no time to get through security. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

How long before this asshole is back out on the streets? 

 

https://www.fox7austin.com/news/attempted-break-in-machete-attack-liberty-hill-texas

The man gets up, comes up the stairs, and pulls on the door. 

"I start running through the house. I lock every door as fast as possible, run upstairs. Luckily, I had a firearm here, so I grabbed my 9mm, unlocked it, ran down as fast as possible," Stevens said. 

The suspect climbed the fence and got on the upper deck where Stevens confronted him. 

"Told him he's got to leave or he's going to lose his life, you know? Luckily, after I did that, he dropped the machete," he said.

The video then shows the intruder climbing back down, and a gun pointing at him as he walks away. 

Stevens' wife had called 911 in the meantime, and deputies arrested 43-year-old Jerry Escamilla of Bertram. He is charged with criminal trespassing and failure to identify and is being held on a $10,000 bond.

Jerry-Escamilla.jpeg?ve=1&tl=1

Posted

This perfectly encapsulates new vs old Austin battle.

TLDR: A bunch of bros start a run club. Run club becomes highly successful. East side residents get pissed for well...I guess it maybe comes down to gentrification.

https://archive.ph/ssc1I

Why East Austin residents are clashing with a notorious, young running club
Bianca Moreno-Paz
Austin American-Statesman
Published 5:01 a.m. CT Aug. 22, 2024Updated 5:01 a.m. CT Aug. 22, 2024


In a fight between a gentrified Austin and even newer newcomers, a notorious running club is rubbing residents raw.

On a Saturday morning in February, a quartet of brawny, Generation-Z men laced up their running shoes, donned their preferred sunglasses and leisurewear, and readied to run the lakeside trails. In the months that followed, the jogs rapidly grew into the Raw Dawg Run Club, an organized group of hundreds, fanning out along the trail on the shores of Lady Bird Lake. 

What started out as a casual, sweaty way to build community has been met with pushback from residents and the intervention of the city of Austin. 

Residents of one East Austin neighborhood filed enough complaints against the run club to have it expelled from the area. The tension between "new Austin" and "newer Austin" is often most pronounced in areas like East Austin, which have been gentrified and culturally displaced.

Now, the run club, which says it encourages people of all backgrounds and athletic qualifications to participate, finds itself unmoored after three separate instances of alleged violations of city code. It is in the process of applying for a permit that would allow it to operate on a weekly basis as a special event. 

The Raw Dawg Run Club founders maintain that they only had good intentions in creating the group, and that they want to rise above the complaints.
"We want to kill people with kindness," co-founder Tin Nguyen said.


What happened to the Raw Dawg Run Club?
Complaints from serious runners and casual joggers alike forced the Raw Dawg Run Club — founded by Nguyen, 24; Darren Belasa, 24; Ian Fonz, 23; and Noah Rolette, 23 — to take its jaunts elsewhere, selecting a loop around the East Austin neighborhood of Rosewood. 

Yet residents there said the runners took up limited parking spaces at a Little League field, displaced locals from using the Boggy Creek Greenbelt and illegally parked on neighborhood streets spanning East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to Rosewood Drive. The city of Austin's Parks and Recreation Department issued a cease-and-desist notice, prompting Raw Dawg’s move to Cabana Club. 

Raw Dawg is no stranger to controversy. Members of the group were found to have run this year's Austin Marathon without registering, a controversial act known in the running community as banditing. The members told the American-Statesman they have since made amends with the marathon’s leadership.

The club's residency in Govalle lasted only a few weeks. The city shut it down, citing the lack of an event permit, though Raw Dawg was the only run club required to have one. The decision left the four co-founders “frustrated” after they said they made multiple concessions, such as adding pacers, to keep the run club in operation. 

The city said the group’s size — it draws up to 600 people at a time — and ability to disrupt the flow of traffic categorized it as a special event.

In a statement, the city's Development Services Department said it would provide support to make Raw Dawg’s Saturday meets “feasible,” recognizing that “special events enrich Austin’s quality of life, build community, and support the local economy.”


Filling a hole in Austin’s running scene
Raw Dawg was born out of the co-founders’ experience running the Honolulu Marathon in Hawaii. They sought to bottle and replicate the collective feeling of that experience in Austin. 

Nguyen said he believes Raw Dawg fills a gap in the plethora of Austin run club options, which do not place an emphasis on creating and sustaining community. As a native of Laredo and newcomer to Austin, he felt other run clubs were less welcoming. 

“(People) would run and then leave. Now we're putting the ‘club’ in run club, whereas the other run clubs just ‘run,’” he said. “We bring a different vibe: This is supposed to be fun. This is not a place to beat yourself up.” 

Rolette, the sole co-founder raised in the Austin area, said they implemented a no-headphones rule to encourage participants to socialize and “learn to run with your demons.” 

While the run club is on hold in Austin, the group is planning to share Raw Dawg with as many of its 70,000 followers as possible. In August they went on the road to Chicago; at the end of the month, they will pop up in Miami for one day. In the future, they’d like to take the concept international. 

“We want to make running sexy again, but make it fun, make it enjoyable, make it less serious,” Fonz said. 


East side gentrification
Running clubs are not new to the Capitol city. Their popularity surged during the COVID-19 pandemic, when outdoor activity became a cheap, reliable way to stay safe and sane. Upwards of 30 run clubs in Austin are affiliated with coffee shops, running stores and large corporations like Nike.

An Austin Code Department employee watches as hundreds of runners participating in a Raw Dawg Run Club meetup leave Cabana Club on Saturday, July 20, 2024 in Austin. Raw Dawg Run Club founders said they are often ticketed for hosting events in public spaces without a permit, but are also the only run club that is ticketed regularly.

So why do residents and the city of Austin appear to be targeting Raw Dawg? Regardless of the disruption, the club's presence is representative of a shifting status quo, in an area that has experienced rapid gentrification, said Alex Hannaford, a journalist and author of the forthcoming book “Lost in Austin: The Evolution of an American City.” 

“This represents change, and (residents are) arguing against change,” said Hannaford, who lived in Austin for 17 years and now lives in New York. “It's kind of ironic. That ship has sailed; the east side has already changed.”

Paul Saldaña, a sixth-generation Austinite and local strategic consultant, bore witness to Austin's "painful history" as the east side transitioned from a Mexican American and African American community besieged by racism to the development of sleek buildings and upscale restaurants, effectively erasing their history and existence.

"When an area becomes gentrified, the people who are moving in bring with them cultural or commercial dynamics or initiatives that cater to them," Saldaña said.
Hannaford said Austin’s current opposition to affordable housing development — the movement known as NIMBY, or "not in my backyard" — has its roots in the prolonged effects of the 1928 master plan, which gave the Austin City Council the freedom to segregate ethnic minorities in East Austin.

“You’ve seen a historically Black district, which was designed on purpose by white people, then undergoing gentrification itself, and more white people want to move in and change it,” Hannaford said. “I feel like everybody moving into the east side needs a history lesson.” 
 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...