Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I also think Sark needed to give an actual reason as to why he let PK go. Agreeing or disagreeing with what he said is almost irrelevant imo. Sark let a top 10 DC go, I want to know why he did and don’t go into coach speaking mode which he is really good at doing. Having to go with reasons given by people in the know on here or 9.95 sources would just piss off everyone more than common coach speak answer. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, Levi said:

I also think Sark needed to give an actual reason as to why he let PK go. Agreeing or disagreeing with what he said is almost irrelevant imo. Sark let a top 10 DC go, I want to know why he did and don’t go into coach speaking mode which he is really good at doing. Having to go with reasons given by people in the know on here or 9.95 sources would just piss off everyone more than common coach speak answer. 


Sark doesn't owe you shit. It could be a personal issue between him and PK.  It could be that he thinks PK is really good but not quite good enough for the SEC.  It could be that PK was angling for a job on the West Coast and Sark found out about it.  It could be that Sark wanted to blitz twice as much as PK did and that was it. There could be a million different reasons. 

Just win, baby. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
40 minutes ago, TreatyOak said:

Im sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I hope PK trashes Sark in an INTERVIEW. Sark deserves it for his conceived comments that reflect poorly on him, not PK.   


That may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.  And I've read the collected works of Burnt Orange and White. 

  • Haha 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Levi said:

I also think Sark needed to give an actual reason as to why he let PK go. Agreeing or disagreeing with what he said is almost irrelevant imo. Sark let a top 10 DC go, I want to know why he did and don’t go into coach speaking mode which he is really good at doing. Having to go with reasons given by people in the know on here or 9.95 sources would just piss off everyone more than common coach speak answer. 

I think Muschamp became available and this was Sark’s compromise bc he is never per his own words in many many mainstream articles giving up playcalling. I do believe he got pressure behind the scenes and I do believe this is his compromise. Let me bring in my DC and he will HC the defense while I HC the offense. And I am keeping my crew on offense, that’s how I read all he wrote. And he probably threw PK under the bus a little with the Powers that Be. If only I could focus on offense and not both sides of the ball we’d win. This is his compromise. If it works Sark is a hero. If it doesn’t work he is gone imo. Because he is getting everything he wanted. 
 

and I’m pretty sure he reads our shit anyway. 
 

so here is a suggestion Sark: i have the slogan for you for the 2026 season “No Excuses. Just win.” Drop the full of gas busted brakes bullshit. 
 

now go out there and bag a championship 🤘🏼

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Reports are he was fired not that he resigned 

Let’s say you want out of your current situation and have $2M left on your contract.  Do you leave with nothing or get fired and take the $2M with you?  I know what I would do but then again I like money.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:


Sark doesn't owe you shit. It could be a personal issue between him and PK.  It could be that he thinks PK is really good but not quite good enough for the SEC.  It could be that PK was angling for a job on the West Coast and Sark found out about it.  It could be that Sark wanted to blitz twice as much as PK did and that was it. There could be a million different reasons. 

Just win, baby. 

For the most part I agree with you. I’m not one of those to cling on every word in a coach’s press conference and cry when he does coach speak. I find it funny when people do in the weekly press conference threads. But I think PK being one of the highest paid coordinators in the nation and by all means doing the best job last 3-4 years, an explanation is the right thing to do in this particular shower. But I can see why others may disagree. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:


That may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.  And I've read the collected works of Burnt Orange and White. 

I am flattered and humbled by your comment. I would like to thank all the people who paved the way for my post. @BurntOrange&White, @Thatguy and @C-Man, this award belongs to you, as well. Thank you, thank you, thank you!

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Levi said:

For the most part I agree with you. I’m not one of those to cling on every word in a coach’s press conference and cry when he does coach speak. I find it funny when people do in the weekly press conference threads. But I think PK being one of the highest paid coordinators in the nation and by all means doing the best job last 3-4 years, an explanation is the right thing to do in this particular shower. But I can see why others may disagree. 


I really think that it could be as simple as something like this: Sark wants to blitz more. PK thinks blitzing is, for the most part, not worth the ROI. He tells Sark that he'll blitz more, then just can't bring himself to do it. Finally, Sark is like "dude, we agreed that you'd blitz more."  I'm not saying that it's necessarily blitzing, but some philosophical difference. 

Also, I do think that Sark realizes that Georgia is really his biggest obstacle and who has more insight into Georgia and Kirby Smart than Muschamp? 

Edited by Horn Under a Bad Sign
Posted
4 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:


I really think that it could be as simple as something like this: Sark wants to blitz more. PK thinks blitzing is, for the most part, not worth the ROI. He tells Sark that he'll blitz more, then just can't bring himself to do it. Finally, Sark is like "dude, we agreed that you'd blitz more."  I'm not saying that it's necessarily blitzing, but some philosophical difference. 

Also, I do think that Sark realizes that Georgia is really his biggest obstacle and who has more insight into Georgia and Kirby Smart than Muschamp? 

Yeah others have said similar as to why they think he let PK go and I agree with most of those reasons. My post was mainly in favor of him saying something today outside of coach speak. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:


I really think that it could be as simple as something like this: Sark wants to blitz more. PK thinks blitzing is, for the most part, not worth the ROI. He tells Sark that he'll blitz more, then just can't bring himself to do it. Finally, Sark is like "dude, we agreed that you'd blitz more."  I'm not saying that it's necessarily blitzing, but some philosophical difference. 

Also, I do think that Sark realizes that Georgia is really his biggest obstacle and who has more insight into Georgia and Kirby Smart than Muschamp? 

Could PK go to the OC and say “dude I thought we talked about you not going 3 and out 10-12 times a game” or “dude I thought you agreed to score more than 7 points against Ohio state after we get more yards on them” maybe even “dude can you stop abandoning the run constantly and killing clock with incomplete passes.” Muschamp knows what it’s like to watch the offense continually fuck him over so he’s got that going for him and he was wearing the same colors when it happened. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
Could PK go to the OC and say “dude I thought we talked about you not going 3 and out 10-12 times a game” or “dude I thought you agreed to score more than 7 points against Ohio state after we get more yards on them” maybe even “dude can you stop abandoning the run constantly and killing clock with incomplete passes.” Muschamp knows what it’s like to watch the offense continually fuck him over so he’s got that going for him and he was wearing the same colors when it happened. 

How about “shit man, my bad for letting Florida pound our ass”

“Sorry our was too busy checking Diego’s mom. Can’t believe they almost came back”

“Those adjustments we talked about? Well I have different plan for 4Q against Georgia.”

“Damn Mississippi got hands. Thank god for our second string QB”
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Candi Fisther said:


How about “shit man, my bad for letting Florida pound our ass”

“Sorry our was too busy checking Diego’s mom. Can’t believe they almost came back”

“Those adjustments we talked about? Well I have different plan for 4Q against Georgia.”

“Damn Mississippi got hands. Thank god for our second string QB”

Sark probably said those things to PK lol. Who took responsibility for our abysmal offense for 75% of the season? 

Posted
Sark probably said those things to PK lol. Who took responsibility for our abysmal offense for 75% of the season? 

Who do you think? Or are you too dense to understand what is happening here?

But don’t let me stop you from outing yourself as a leading candidate for the newest drug trial to cure Down syndrome.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I already told Sark what our new slogan should be thru surly. So when that is the slogan then the title of the thread will change? But this is the Sark thread about Sark and it’s not OB sunshine pumping. It’s a pretty even mix like the results of this past year of people who like him and people who don’t and people who don’t care about who Sark is or is not they just want to win. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Hookem10 said:

Fucking A - change this thread title to we fucking hate everyone and anything connected to coaching at Texas 

It’s like the Simpsons RNC and DNC slogans - we hate life and ourselves! 

Posted
1 hour ago, Candi Fisther said:


Who do you think? Or are you too dense to understand what is happening here?

But don’t let me stop you from outing yourself as a leading candidate for the newest drug trial to cure Down syndrome.

Insufferable prick, if you don’t like the opinion then float on by. 
 

image.gif.7b360e50ace5bfbe2dc843c075c04b90.gif

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Jimbob said:

Let’s say you want out of your current situation and have $2M left on your contract.  Do you leave with nothing or get fired and take the $2M with you?  I know what I would do but then again I like money.

You don’t say there jimbo? 

Posted
22 minutes ago, scramblyn said:

You don’t say there jimbo? 

You know, things coulda been a lot different. A&M only paid $48M to coach there, and 77.5M buyout, should have got at least $200M for havin to live around them rednecks.  Caint just walk away from the money though, gotta get fired to earn it.

Bass boats don’t buy themselves and the gas ain’t free.  Also got an old playbook in good shape I can sell you by the page, looking to put a new above ground pool out at the ranch.

Posted (edited)

Sark is more unlikable with each passing day. 

He fucks up the program in a year when the CFP is up for grabs, then blames PK on his way out when he was the best coach we had on staff.

Fuck Sark. Pull your head out of your ass.

Edited by Ghost of Shag
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
Posted
43 minutes ago, Ghost of Shag said:

Sark is more unlikable with each passing day. 

He fucks up the program in a year when the CFP is up for grabs, then blames PK on his way out when he was the best coach we had on staff.

Fuck Sark. Pull your head out of your ass.

It had the exact desired result. The chuckle heads are all simping over the return of an old coach who got put out to pasture because he used to coach here. They're all rah rah yay team, all while the biggest issues on the staff return. Pretty typical of all fan base loyalist. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)

In todays press conference I found Sarks implication that he needed to be a babysitter for an experienced coordinator like Pete Kwiatkowski to be disingenuous. I wasn't buying it, and I imagine PK would feel disrespected hearing those insinuations.  

Edited by perfectchaos007
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, TreatyOak said:

I am flattered and humbled by your comment. I would like to thank all the people who paved the way for my post. @BurntOrange&White, @Thatguy and @C-Man, this award belongs to you, as well. Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Why am I catching strays?

Edited by Thatguy
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Levi said:

I also think Sark needed to give an actual reason as to why he let PK go. Agreeing or disagreeing with what he said is almost irrelevant imo. Sark let a top 10 DC go, I want to know why he did and don’t go into coach speaking mode which he is really good at doing. Having to go with reasons given by people in the know on here or 9.95 sources would just piss off everyone more than common coach speak answer. 

Why does Sark need to give any explanation to anyone for how he manages his staff? That makes no sense at all. 

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...