Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

Lol, I think we have different definitions for game manager because that feels very game manager to me.  You're correct that we have no idea how this plays out, but we are playing at home and just need him to show up for one game.  The fact that Vandy doesn't really have a lot of tape on Caldwell AND the fact that he took a deuce on Miss St.'s face on the road during OT to win the game is pretty impressive to me.

We definitely do. When I think of game manager it’s a guy that can run the system and take care of the football. Why the 20 TDs and 15 ints does not scream game manager to me, but as we agreed nobody knows until we see it 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

It's fine so long as you admit your opinion is terrible. Wingo is the big play threat in this offense. Getting rid of our explosiveness, the only real trait we can rely on right now, is stupid. We should look to utilize him differently maybe. Take him off the field? Fuck no. 

the problem with this is that explosiveness is required to catch up in our current offense because we can't reliably march down the field and convert 3rd down or goal line drives 

you fix either one of these problems and suddenly you aren't playing from behind all the time

the explosiveness because the kill shot 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BigHornedLurker said:

the problem with this is that explosiveness is required to catch up in our current offense because we can't reliably march down the field and convert 3rd down or goal line drives 

you fix either one of these problems and suddenly you aren't playing from behind all the time

the explosiveness because the kill shot 

We are playing from behind because our oline is terrible. It isn't because of Wingo. Replacing him doesn't fix your problem. 

Edited by Dahobbs
Posted

I want to see the front 7 play cohesively.  LB to take smart angles and tackle. No yards after contact.

I feel like if PK brings the goods we should force 1 or 2 TOs. 

Hopefully we fall on the damn ball this time around. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Navin R. Johnson said:

What happened to lance Jackson?

Sounds like there’s some hittin’ goin’ on at practice.  You want the games to be easy as compared and I like it.   May lose a guy for a game or two but we need to bring the dogs out in this league 

Posted
4 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

Nobody knows shit about fuck regarding how Caldwell will perform vs Arch. We all learn together Saturday. 

 

IMG_20251029_195557.jpg.62b5ebec4fe301a3aea0db87f2337540.jpg

Damn Ruth was awesome....

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Codaxx said:

Might happen, but 20 career TDs vs 15 ints is not screaming game manager. I am just saying nobody knows how this will work out, but some of the comments I see are detached from reality

29 total TD’s.  Can’t short the man his rushing touchdowns 

Posted
47 minutes ago, jdhorn92 said:

Sounds like there’s some hittin’ goin’ on at practice.  You want the games to be easy as compared and I like it.   May lose a guy for a game or two but we need to bring the dogs out in this league 

The long term NFL style shit yadda yadda has seemed to work for the D *thus far*, it only took a crazy deep defense and we have a chance to be relatively more fresh and healthy than other defenses we face rest of the way. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BurgleBro said:

I want to see the front 7 play cohesively.  LB to take smart angles and tackle. No yards after contact.

I feel like if PK brings the goods we should force 1 or 2 TOs. 

Hopefully we fall on the damn ball this time around. 

I want to see our secondary not play 10 yard off on 3rd and 2

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

I want to see our secondary not play 10 yard off on 3rd and 2

Everyone does. 

I don't think that's possible given Vandy identity

Posted
3 hours ago, BurgleBro said:

I want to see the front 7 play cohesively.  LB to take smart angles and tackle. No yards after contact.

I feel like if PK brings the goods we should force 1 or 2 TOs. 

Hopefully we fall on the damn ball this time around. 

Our defense is going to score more than  the fighting Pavias.

Posted
5 hours ago, BigHornedLurker said:

the problem with this is that explosiveness is required to catch up in our current offense because we can't reliably march down the field and convert 3rd down or goal line drives 

you fix either one of these problems and suddenly you aren't playing from behind all the time

the explosiveness because the kill shot 

They reliably marched down the field and converted third downs to score 24 straight points in Q3/Q4 against MS. st

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...