Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
A radical position? You mean the stuff that doesn’t get done because that’s not how stuff works or the stuff that does get done and doesn’t make a difference?
[mention=51]Captainant[/mention] what you and the fanbois don’t seem to understand is that most of what Mamdani’s has proposed with housing policy is just repackaged baby boomer progressive orthodoxy, a mix of obstruction through stakeholder input, wishful thinking, and symbolic action. 
 
Explain please, how is more of the same radical? Other than how he talks and presents himself?

He has a funny ay-rab mooslem name. Don’t get no more radical than that.
Posted

Lol, the sister of the Times’ Nazi source posts on Blue Sky and is dropping family lore:

IMG_5180.thumb.jpeg.ab7a993da5c49adcfd01e8de52073b47.jpeg
 

These are the types of people Times political editors and reporters think are sophisticated intellectuals. That’s the type of people the Times, WaPo, and other mainstream media institutions hire now to cover politics because their executives think the left went insane in 2020 with the BLM marches.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Captainant said:

Yes yes, anyone staking a radical position is just as lame as the mainstream. I'm familiar with the play you're running from Bernie

What are you talking about? His platform is lock stock and barrel the progressive position that has dominated NYC, SF, DC and LA since like the 70’s. As is the rest of his platform, just glossed up on Tik Tok  

Edit: Bozo said it better. 

Edited by We’reTexas
Posted
21 hours ago, We’reTexas said:

Think “build the wall and make Mexico pay for it” but make it leftist housing policy. 

The first is a shitty fucking goal and the second -- affordable housing --is a good goal.

The first reflects a warped mind and the second a lofty goal.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 7/4/2025 at 8:19 AM, Captainant said:

Unless you're prosecuting a trumpist lmfao. How the fuck could you type that sentence on July 4, 2025 with a straight face

Um, that whole 4th Amendment thing?

Speaking in this case about the checkered origin of the truth.

And, again, had the procedures had the time to spin out, he'd be convicted on more than 34 counts.

Posted
43 minutes ago, The Original Greaser Bob said:

The first is a shitty fucking goal and the second -- affordable housing --is a good goal.

The first reflects a warped mind and the second a lofty goal.

What I am trying to explain is that both approaches are so utterly divorced from reality that they deserve ridicule.

Posted

My main concern is that the Lasker information is, apparently, true.

So, that's a bit of a problem for Mamdani.

A separate issue is NYT reporting it while calling Lasker an academic opposed to affirmative action.  While that is literally true, it's a pretty horrendous minimization of him.

Some other fun tidbits.  Lasker is a PhD candidate at Tceh, but that is one well-hidden fact. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-l-b84457304?trk=people-guest_people_search-card

He's also speaking at a "Natalist" conference held on the UT campus at the ATT Conference Center.  ATT apparently is just a hotel that anyone can book for just about anything but geezus.  "Natalists" are white supremacist eugenicists.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

a problem for Mamdani.

People want affordability. Nobody cared that he opposes Israel's genocide, and they won't care how he filled out an online form when he was 17



×
×
  • Create New...