Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

you mean "on the shitter"? 

I'm not picky. Shower, shitter, wherever the lord takes him. Although I'm doubting he can shower or shit on his own. I feel really, really bad for his home health nurse. The smell alone. Can you Imagine? I would rather inhale methane from a deceased body. 

Posted

When Elko inevitably passes on in the next 3 years, I want aggy to promote Holmon Wiggins to active HC just for the lulz and their misery. Or they could pump him up like they did their baseball coach who took the number 1 team and dismantled it. But he was the real architect behind their success. We just missed it. Schloss was just the helicopter coach, not a "real" coach. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
59 minutes ago, JesusSweatDuck said:

20251223_205903.jpg

Of course our large money donors whisper to random aggy insurance agents about their finances, NIL, etc. Clearly, a strongly worded letter is in order for our donors.

It is beyond amazing what these guys make up.

I'm hearing the local College Station buffets have a Not Allowed poster of Elko taped on the door? Any ideas?

Wiggins is a top 3 type OC - this hire has got NC all over it - book it. We should tap into the aggy whisper network to confirm this.

Getting bounced/losing first round in the CFP makes some aggy poster (this is real - just too lazy to find it) very concerned on their NC title this year. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 hours ago, nnm said:

 

Lol went over and read that….. seems every single call that doesnt go as they believe it should is some aggy bias, esipn or whatever they call it conspiracy theory to keep aggy down….the little brother’ing is deep over there!

  • Drool 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Babytime said:

Amazing stuff.

 

The ‘liberal media’.  I’m not sure that exist as every major network, including ESPN via Disney, has bent the knee to our president.  The delusion is thick.

Not sure the right or left media gives two fucks about NCAAF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

WWI had American troops for less than 2 years- war declared April 1917 and armistice signed November 1918. 
 

WW2 had American troops from 1942 to 1945.  
 

discounting the war efforts of all the would-be longhorns, as they do, you could strike maybe 6 seasons off of the record because of war. But how can they claim a national title in 1919 on the heels of winning ww1, did guys de-enlist?

  • Haha 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, JesusSweatDuck said:

Sure Jan. Look at this self confessed t-shirt fan

 

Screenshot_20251225-064515.png

Freaking stolen valor. Was the blood of soldiers from UT, or SMU, or TCU, or TTU, or Rice, or any other school in the country, less valorous than that of Aggies?  That makes me sick. 
And Aggies are too lazy to check the W/L and MNC records of actual military academies at the same time Aggie says they couldn’t be good at football. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

The World Wars argument falls apart for Aggie fans when someone points out that West Point won championships in 1944 and 1945. This was during a time when West Point graduated classes early to get them into the war.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Danimal said:

The World Wars argument falls apart for Aggie fans when someone points out that West Point won championships in 1944 and 1945. This was during a time when West Point graduated classes early to get them into the war.

That's not what they told me in fish camp

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, Danimal said:

The World Wars argument falls apart for Aggie fans when someone points out that West Point won championships in 1944 and 1945. This was during a time when West Point graduated classes early to get them into the war.

The 'all male military school' excuse from aggie is strange, since the only thing they've done in the history of college football that matters happened when they were an all male military school.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Danimal said:

The World Wars argument falls apart for Aggie fans when someone points out that West Point won championships in 1944 and 1945. This was during a time when West Point graduated classes early to get them into the war.

Danimal, if you only look at the time period between 1991 and 1994, reverse the order of the numbers, divide by 7, and find the square root, they’ve won all the games against us.

And let’s not even bring 2012-2023 into the picture. They would’ve won all those games. 

And I heard of a family who had a new baby on December 2.  Texas has never beaten A&M in that baby’s lifetime. It’s a competitive series.

Stupid sip!
 

 

  • Haha 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

Danimal, if you only look at the time period between 1991 and 1994, reverse the order of the numbers, divide by 7, and find the square root, they’ve won all the games against us.

And let’s not even bring 2012-2023 into the picture. They would’ve won all those games. 

And I heard of a family who had a new baby on December 2.  Texas has never beaten A&M in that baby’s lifetime. It’s a competitive series.

Stupid sip!
 

 

On two separate occasions in a discussion with an aggie, I have heard with my own ears the claim that they would have won every game against Texas from 2012-2023. I had one guy start to get both vehement and visibly angry when I mocked his nonsense with “yeah, I know, you guys are undefeated in all of the games you never played. The aggies are absolute badasses in alternate universes that only you can conjure. “

They fervently believe that nonsense. It’s something to behold. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

They were equally sure they’d win the 2011, 2024, and 2025 games right up until those games got played.  And should be reminded of that.  Probably up until the final minute of each game,  actually.   That’s when they produce the excuses. 

Edited by Pato del Muerto
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

They were equally sure they’d win the 2011, 2024, and 2025 games right up until those games got played.  And should be reminded of that.  Probably up until the final minute of each game,  actually.   That’s when they produce the excuses. 

In public, they whine that we and/or some other evil force cheated them. In private, they ask themselves why they're perpetual losers. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Rholl said:

the little brother’ing is deep over there!

Their answer the last few years about being "little brother" is that people don't realize that A&M opened its doors 7 years (or whatever) before we did. They think that's a real zinger. Should shut all those shit-talking t.u. mouths!

Fucking morons think the nickname has something to do with relative age rather than relative station in the world. Their answer confirms how small they are.

Personally, I won't call a stalker "little brother" even if the stalker isn't particularly threatening. They've become more virulent since their stint of shady success under Sherrill then his bagman. Thought they had a new world order going there for a while. Nope.

To be clear, I talk about the TexAggies not the increasing number of 2%ers who may save the place.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...