Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, lilMAC25 said:

Because it’s often seen as proof that a man cannot satisfy the woman he loves.

Female Insight: I have never cheated. I know women who have. With the exception of one woman who still simply cannot commit to anyone (she particularly enjoys taken men and promptly dumps them once she gets them) the other women I know who have cheated did so bc their partner wasn’t satisfying them emotionally. Their partner was never emotionally available. It wasn’t just “I’m getting ignored so I’m cheating” it was more “I have tried multiple times to get this person to put me above their dry cleaning and failed…” 

 

It doesn’t make it right to cheat (break up if you are below their dry cleaning on their list of priorities) unless you are swingers and up front about it. Just my opinion. 
most women cheat because the emotional attachment is being thwarted by their partner. 

Edited by Nicole44
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
8 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Missing Junior Day is the only thing that troubles me there.  That seems to be actual fact.  But it seems like a coach should get a couple weeks time off immediately after the season, particularly if going through a divorce or similar personal problems.

If you are a highly compensated individual and you cannot perform at a high level commensurate with your level of compensation and responsibilities, then leave. If a minimum wage shift worker  can be shit canned for missing shifts and/or screwing up multiple times , so should someone at the top of the food chain, particularly those with golden parachutes. 

millionaire coaches are set for life with their contracts , so if they don’t measure up , no worries on cutting the cord.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Lou_Sassle said:

The number 1 definition of "fag", according to Oxford, is "a cigarette"... is that the current definition according to everyone else in the world who isn't a 60+ old boomer that writes definitions in a British dictionary? 

Yes, but that IS a definition in current use. 

And M-W is distinctly American, and says you're wrong.

Take the loss.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

So let's say a cuck is a man whose wife/partner has cheated on him.  Why is that used as a perjorative term?  

... seriously?

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Tex Pete said:

I have no idea what race you are, but you’re a terribly shitty poster. Fuck off. 

Racism behind every tree, every problem, every opinion is a pathetic , ineffective intellectually dishonest form of debate , as are ad hominem attacks. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I'll let it go at that, but it's a really stupid reason.

I mean yes, we should blame the person who cheats and not the person they cheated on. 

But you know how it is.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 hours ago, immamac said:

This thread brought the lulz Saturday, now it's just a bit sad. 

Some of y'all need to know when the joke is over and played out. 

Says a lot about the terrible state of things these days. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, El Squared said:

Racism behind every tree, every problem, every opinion is a pathetic , ineffective intellectually dishonest form of debate , as are ad hominem attacks. 

And has nothing at all to do with this situation. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 hours ago, immamac said:

This thread brought the lulz Saturday, now it's just a bit sad. 

Some of y'all need to know when the joke is over and played out. 

Are we trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube now?

  • Haha 4
Posted
15 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

Female Insight: I have never cheated. I know women who have. With the exception of one woman who still simply cannot commit to anyone (she particularly enjoys taken men and promptly dumps them once she gets them) the other women I know who have cheated did so bc their partner wasn’t satisfying them emotionally. Their partner was never emotionally available. It wasn’t just “I’m getting ignored so I’m cheating” it was more “I have tried multiple times to get this person to put me above their dry cleaning and failed…” 

 

It doesn’t make it right to cheat (break up if you are below their dry cleaning on their list of priorities) unless you are swingers and up front about it. Just my opinion. 
most women cheat because the emotional attachment is being thwarted by their partner. 

I've been the other guy. One of several in a long line of other guys with this girl. The guy knew it was happening, didn't like it, but stuck with her because he was the living embodiment of that guy in the Offspring song (except THAT guy at least got laid in the lyrics; this guy's girl was pretty much exclusively fucking other dudes).

Now THAT guy was a cuck, in the pejorative sense; he knew she was cheating, didn't like it, but was officially with her anyway because... she was The One. For goodness sake get a life and find some self respect...

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, 6th Street said:

Yeah I think we're done here...

What tipped you off? The fact that we aren’t even discussing the topic of the thread anymore? Or the topic of the thread itself should be done? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, South Austin said:

Very classless. He needs to use the term “sexual intercourse.”  “Make love” is also acceptable.

“Why Mr. mac, what kind of organization are you operating over there?! I never!”

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

We shouldn’t have a cuck for a HC. 

agreed . Additionally we shouldn’t have players willing to fuck another man’s wife. 

Edited by El Squared
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Nicole44 said:

What tipped you off? The fact that we aren’t even discussing the topic of the thread anymore? Or the topic of the thread itself should be done? 

The distance between the importance of this story on surly and in the real world is vast.

  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

 With the exception of one woman who still simply cannot commit to anyone (she particularly enjoys taken men and promptly dumps them in the lake once she gets them) the other women I know who have cheated did so bc their partner wasn’t satisfying them emotionally.

you forgot a few words...

  • Haha 4
Posted
17 minutes ago, El Squared said:

If you are a highly compensated individual and you cannot perform at a high level commensurate with your level of compensation and responsibilities, then leave. If a minimum wage shift worker  can be shit canned for missing shifts and/or screwing up multiple times , so should someone at the top of the food chain, particularly those with golden parachutes. 

millionaire coaches are set for life with their contracts , so if they don’t measure up , no worries on cutting the cord.

This. This right here. THIS IS WHAT BUGS ME. 

I don't care if Sark is cucked or fucked; what I care about is that he's been AWOL from the job for long stretches. It's starting to sound like his USC tenure all over again, but with better assistant coaches to cover for his bullshit.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Rimbo said:

This. This right here. THIS IS WHAT BUGS ME. 

I don't care if Sark is cucked or fucked; what I care about is that he's been AWOL from the job for long stretches. It's starting to sound like his USC tenure all over again, but with better assistant coaches to cover for his bullshit.

It sounds like a bunch of internet drama queens are upset with a season that isn't meeting expectations.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

It sounds like a bunch of internet drama queens are upset with a season that isn't meeting expectations.

It’s not the season, you are deflecting, yes the season sucks but HC sending out signals of  leaving, means he’s not fully vested , I guess you are ok with that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

^^^^^

Nothing like a half time coach getting full time compensation. Guess you forgot about FUPM. Unlike FUPM, perhaps it’s not Sark’s fault , but it doesn’t matter . He’s paid to perform, not sulk.

Edited by El Squared
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, El Squared said:

It’s not the season, you are deflecting, yes the season sucks but HC sending out signals of  leaving, means he’s not fully vested , I guess you are ok with that.

I'm not going to fault anyone for wanting to move up professionally. It's not like he's playing footsies with other colleges.

2 minutes ago, El Squared said:

Nothing like a half time coach getting full time compensation. Guess you forgot about FUPM. Unlike FUPM, perhaps it’s not Sark’s fault , but it doesn’t matter . He’s paid to perform, not sulk.

Has anyone reported that he's not working full time?

Posted
3 minutes ago, El Squared said:

Nothing like a half time coach getting full time compensation. Guess you forgot about FUPM. Unlike FUPM, perhaps it’s not Sark’s fault , but it doesn’t matter . He’s paid to perform, not sulk.

"half time"?  LMAO

Posted

Got it. 
 

gossip that was all over the internet starting in May and June of 2025 happened because people were mad that a season that hadn’t even started yet was gonna suck? Duly noted. 
 

forget the personal shit for a second. 
 

let it sink in. 
 

he was “missing” for 30 days. He missed Junior day and related events.
 

When he resurfaced and started doing interviews in March of 2025 he explained that he wanted to ditch the spring game, go to NfL practices (which have failed every single time in college they have been employed) and said how much he admired how much the NfL does shit and likes to visit NFL teams in the off season and wants to emulate the NfL.

 

So we did this. Got beat in the shoe and got beat in the swamp after a bye. And people really think L’Oreal and any of those shenanigans are why we are pissed? 🤣 

 

So do people need the article I found where sark was heavily quoted saying all this? About nfl practices and ditching the spring game and most spring anything and going to failed NFL pro style light no contact practices in rhe late summer? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Nicole44 said:

So do people need the article I found where sark was heavily quoted saying all this? About nfl practices and ditching the spring game and most spring anything and going to failed NFL pro style light no contact practices in rhe late summer? 

Yes. And also the article saying he was missing for 30 days.

KThx.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Yes. And also the article saying he was missing for 30 days.

KThx.

You would have to ask CTJ for that intel. and even if he provides it you would just move the goal posts to say it doesn’t matter. Bc that’s what y’all do. 😂 
 

here is the article though where he speaks about changing our ENTIRE philosophy of the offseason though on March 11, 2025. Seems to have worked really well! 😡 
 

https://www.burntorangenation.com/2025/3/11/24383551/texas-longhorns-spring-practice-date-format-steve-sarkisian#comments

 

now you can read in between the lines here that Sark wasn’t present for the first four weeks of winter conditioning. Or not. Or maybe our press corp could ask. But that would be dreaming, 

 

The first four weeks of winter conditioning were primarily spent with strength and conditioning coach Torre Becton and his staff before beginning to incorporate some functional training based on position leading into spring break, which begins on March 17.

Edited by Nicole44
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

You would have to ask CTJ for that intel. and even if he provides it you would just move the goal posts to say it doesn’t matter. Bc that’s what y’all do. 😂 
 

here is the article though where he speaks about changing our ENTIRE philosophy of the offseason though on March 11, 2025. Seems to have worked really well! 😡 
 

https://www.burntorangenation.com/2025/3/11/24383551/texas-longhorns-spring-practice-date-format-steve-sarkisian#comments

So no one is reporting that he was gone for 30 days?

Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

So no one is reporting that he was gone for 30 days?

I pulled a quote from the article and edited my above post to include it: our press corp isn’t asking jack shit of anyone but one can read between the lines here if one isn’t wearing dark colored glasses. And if you reread CTJ’s initial posts. I don’t have CTJ’s sources and ain’t speaking for him and don’t know his sources. Original CTJ post from this weekend. The truth is you won’t be satisfied with anything anyone has just admit it. 

The first four weeks of winter conditioning were primarily spent with strength and conditioning coach Torre Becton and his staff before beginning to incorporate some functional training based on position leading into spring break, which begins on March 17.

IMG_8694.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nicole44 said:

I pulled a quote from the article and edited my above post to include it: our press corp isn’t asking jack shit of anyone but one can read between the lines here if one isn’t wearing dark colored glasses. And if you reread CTJ’s initial posts. I don’t have CTJ’s sources and ain’t speaking for him and don’t know his sources. Original CTJ post from this weekend. The truth is you won’t be satisfied with anything anyone has just admit it. 

The first four weeks of winter conditioning were primarily spent with strength and conditioning coach Torre Becton and his staff before beginning to incorporate some functional training based on position leading into spring break, which begins on March 17.

IMG_8694.png

Please explain to me why I'm supposed to take that seriously.

Posted
6 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Please explain to me why I'm supposed to take that seriously.

Didn't you read all those anonymous message board posts?!!!  And he was MISSING!!!  I mean, his family knew where he was, and his boss certainly knew where he was, but the rest of us anonymous idiots on the message boards did not, and that is inexcusable!  

You allow that shit to happen and then yada yada yada the whole goddamn o-line is trash because of it.  

Posted
8 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Please explain to me why I'm supposed to take that seriously.

You don’t have to.

believe anything 

Carry on with the Arch and the Mannings are a cabal ruining our season and Sark is afraid to bench manning because if he leaves and balls out at another school it will all be over for Sark at UT.
 

This theory is sad and is asinine on its face, bc if Manning could ball out somewhere else he can ball out here like he did in the 4th quarter. 
the Manning’s are not controlling Sark. Sark is doing the same OC shit he’s always done that had fans at Washington ripping their hair out and opposing defensive coordinators realizing they can beat him bc he won’t take what a defense gives him and instead runs all his dudes how he wants to, 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Your Mom said:

Didn't you read all those anonymous message board posts?!!!  And he was MISSING!!!  I mean, his family knew where he was, and his boss certainly knew where he was, but the rest of us anonymous idiots on the message boards did not, and that is inexcusable!  

You allow that shit to happen and then yada yada yada the whole goddamn o-line is trash because of it.  

I have several sources that have been inside her    She’s a saint!!

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

You don’t have to.

believe anything 

Carry on with the Arch and the Mannings are a cabal ruining our season and Sark is afraid to bench manning because if he leaves and balls out at another school it will all be over for Sark at UT.
 

This theory is sad and is asinine on its face, bc if Manning could ball out somewhere else he can ball out here like he did in the 4th quarter. 
the Manning’s are not controlling Sark. Sark is doing the same OC shit he’s always done that had fans at Washington ripping their hair out and opposing defensive coordinators realizing they can beat him bc he won’t take what a defense gives him and instead runs all his dudes how he wants to, 

Arch Manning is a first year starter. 

He's probably going to end up being a very good QB.

  • Hook 'Em 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...