Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, JBJ said:

Should've won this year's game too.  We had an 82% postgame win expectancy.

I would agree with this if Manning wasnt missing wide open receivers. Our defense balled out but holy shit that offense was so bad. 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
14 hours ago, MuellerHorn said:

You might even run into a fellow Surly poster.

Just make sure to wear waterproof clothing. And, uh, watch your drink; okay?

Can that poster be 6th Street? 

11 hours ago, Jkwellborn said:


He needs to be diving head first. That damn sliding gets guys fucked up. He just needs to do it long before anyone gets near enough to take a cheap shot. Because they’ll be coming.

He needs to be diving head first because the fucking spot the second he begins the slide is horseshit. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Not to mention missing a few field goals 
Yes, we got sideshowed good in that one. I think Georgia boosters sent 4-5 high end sex contractors to his hotel room the night before.
Posted
35 minutes ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

I would agree with this if Manning wasnt missing wide open receivers. Our defense balled out but holy shit that offense was so bad. 

Yep, Arch playing terribly and Guilbeau screwing his fellow defensive teammates like he usually is good for once or twice a game did them in. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

Shoudve won that game. Stupid screen play before halftime cooked us. 

offense netted 7 pts vs OSU in that game. Tough to win games like that

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, MuellerHorn said:

Yep, Arch playing terribly and Guilbeau screwing his fellow defensive teammates like he usually is good for once or twice a game did them in. 

If you're referring to the TD, I don't really think it's fair to blame Guilbeau. That was an absurd catch. 

Just now, Ghost of Shag said:

No. We were just better than Bama. 

Milroe was just getting started and we were better in all phases.

 

We weren't favored to win, though, which was the question. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

If you're referring to the TD, I don't really think it's fair to blame Guilbeau. That was an absurd catch. 

We weren't favored to win, though, which was the question. 

Guilbeau was trailing by 3-4 yards. He was beat. Ball being underthrown is the only reason Tate had to make a contested catch. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

If you're referring to the TD, I don't really think it's fair to blame Guilbeau. That was an absurd catch. 

We weren't favored to win, though, which was the question. 

 

29 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

Guilbeau was trailing by 3-4 yards. He was beat. Ball being underthrown is the only reason Tate had to make a contested catch. 

Yep. He got straight beat in 1:1. Go to 9:33. You’re right, though. It was an amazing catch on an under-thrown ball.

 

Edited by MuellerHorn

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...