Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. OU lost Nic Anderson. I'm sure they would have wanted to keep him. He went to LSU.
  3. The personal insults start when the barking seals exit the CR and shit on everything they touch. They see only one thing. Your remarkably stupid supposition that one does not care about a subject just because one does not participate in a Surly thread about it received well earned scorn. The fact that you think that was a real gotcha is sad.
  4. The man knows his audience. He's a master of propaganda, I have to give it to him. The way he just pompously asserts that Texas fans would want to have a bunch of the guys on the ATM roster wearing burnt orange is a perfect move for an aggie audience. The problem for him and the aggies this year is that he likely actually believes that. Now, who would you actually trade for versus the current UT two-deep on a position by position basis? QB - Lee over any QB at Texas right now? No. RB - Moss over Baxter or Wisner? No. Owens over anyone in the top 6? No. I don't need to see the younger guys play yet to know that they're better than a slow guy who can't break arm tackles. Owens has clips on Twitter right now where you can see The Elk's training regimen has taken hold. He's shirtless and is showing off a layer of fat. Is that going to help him move his career YPC to something north of 4.0? Doubt it. WR - Concepcion, Craver, or some spare named Ashton Bethel-Roman? Terry "The Athlete" Bussey? Who on the Texas WR 2 deep do you want to bench for any of those guys? Concepcion's numbers were terrible last year and the guy wasn't injured. TE - Swedish guy, Some dude who was mediocre at Nebraska, Niblack? GTFO. OT - Zuhn, Fatheree, Crownover? I'd take Zuhn over whoever is backing Goosby. The other two guys are replacement value at best. Give me Goosby, Baker, Brooks, Cojoe or Chatman over those 2. OG - Kansas Hyphen Shittalking Guy, Bisontits? - I'll keep Campbell, Hutson, and Omeozulu over Bisontits. KU guy starting opposite of Campbell would work. C - Nabou off of an injury? Hutson has better tape as a starter at OG. Nope. DT - Regis, Hicks, some guy named "Onyedim" or Daelyn Evans? Give me all of the Texas 3 deep over each of them save Regis. I don't know if Regis starts for Texas, but he's in the rotation. Hicks has been an utter disappointment so far. DE/Edge - Cashius Howell, TJ Searcy Dayon Hayes? Howell is objectively a playmaker. The other two transfers are also-ran bums. ATM celebrated getting Searcy and everyone else looked around like "did anyone else want that guy? I didn't want that guy. (shrugs)". The problem with taking Howell is you're then benching Simmons, Burke, Vasek, Moore, Spence, or Hill to give him snaps. You'd take him anyway. The other guys wouldn't make the UT roster. LB - Scooby Wiliams, Taurean York? Benching Hill, Lefau, Smith, Spence, or Moore for those guys? No. The amount of touting going on for York within the media and the aggie fanbase is fascinating. It's similar to Stutsman the last few years at OU. Is no one watching the games or film? If you want tackles made 9 yards down the field on a regular basis, York is your undersized, slow LB from your fantasies. Nope. NB - Chappell or the JAGs behind him? Over McDonald, Guilbeau or Mack? No. CB - Ricks and Lee? Lee is good. Ricks blows. Lee as the 2nd starting CB at Texas this year would work. Safety - Bryce Anderson and Dalton Brooks? Anderson has regressed at ATM. He's a shell of his freshman self. Brooks is slow and often out of position but he'll hit you. Those guys over Taaffe, Williams, or the 4 and 5 star backups? Nope. PK/P - Bond and White are good. The guys Texas has brought in look comparable. So Liucci thinks Texas would take a recovering Moss over Wisner or a recovering Baxter. Not me. Zuhn, KU Hyphen, Regis, Howell, and Lee. 5 guys I'd insert into the Texas 44 man 2 deep. Just an outstanding roster over there at ATM.
  5. Maybe don't do that next time.
  6. I'm going to guess 204.
  7. Yeah, I don't know the first thing about any of that stuff. I just brought up the only recent example I know of.
  8. Was talking about this with a buddy the other day, and I kind of feel like Texas is the only school that has not had a single loss to the transfer portal of a guy that they were seriously intent on keeping or had plans for in the context of their team the next year. I don't care that Xavier Alford went on to be an all conference player somewhere else. Conversely, if Arch transferred and was a total and complete bust I don't care about that either. Alford doesn't count and we didn't work really hard to keep him. Kudos to becoming a better player with more opportunity somewhere else. Arch would absolutely count b/c we would obviously want to keep him- it doesn't matter if he went somewhere else and busted. Make sense? Texas- can't think of a single player we lost that we had plans for an wanted to keep Alabama- Downs, Bond, who else Georgia- AD Mitchell, Carson Beck (I think- stockton seems like he sucks I don't think they wanted him over Beck but- maybe???) Ohio State- Hero Kanu (he was absolutely planned for in their two deep going into this year- right)- I know they were pissed when they lost him. Quinn Ewers? Did tOSU want to keep him at the time? Try hard? aggy- too many to list, probably, but then again most of them sucked. Walter Nolen? Who else have the lost that's good. Oklahoma- Dillon Gabriel? I guess maybe he doesn't count as they didn't try to retain him b/c ----> Jackson Arnold? I guess he doesn't count either as they didn't try to retain him (probably). Ooof their development of players has sucked- you hate to see it. Who you got as OU's biggest transfer loss they wanted to keep? LSU- Michigan Domers USC-w Oregon Cal- Endies? Pick any school you like. If this trend continues of us never losing anyone we try to retain (it can't continue forever- right) and picking up guys from other schools that represent the best of their exPorts I like where our roster management will be, basically, forever. I don't think we've lost any like I said. Maybe I'm forgetting someone. I know we had a couple close calls. Also- I wonder how many guys we ended up getting that were other schools major losses?
  9. JAG corps is that bad? They deal with ordinances, right?
  10. My massive portfolio is at an ATH! Time to retire.
  11. You have zero knowledge about how criminal investigations work.
  12. And Sugar’s dad is Chris Elliot.
  13. We also have a thread in the CR that was started in 2019, which has grown to 89 pages, where folks on the very first page talk about not giving a shit whose "team" gets caught up in the Epstein scandal so long as guilty parties are punished. Your personal lack of give-a-shit there, too, is also noted. Your aggressively defensive indignation, including personal insults such as the one quoted above, didn't get going until one of those "teams" actually began actively blocking the public release of information. And then, you suddenly decide to come out and start attacking the "team" that wants the files to see daylight. I hope you can see how your claim to be on the "team" of justice and transparency rings oh-so-fucking-hollow.
  14. Is it even the internet if there aren't people commenting on shit they know nothing about?
  15. The last two especially have felt more like the earlier seasons. The Lawyer was great as always. Looking forward to some more appearances from series regulars.
  16. So we getting the Wire.WestCoast version?
  17. That's when I noticed Karl Urban's genius. I'd watched LOTR a dozen times at least and never really noticed him. It wasn't until after the 3rd Star Trek movie, and then I watched LOTR again, and I was all, HOLY CRAP, Eomer is BONES! And then seeing him show up as Skurge in Thor, was really amusing,
  18. They want Bix for Wonder Woman.
  19. I don’t really get it. But some of the comments made me laugh. Like Diego dressed up as WW
  20. I was surprised, but McShay had him in the first round. At the end of the first round, and only if he “continues to improve,” but that was the source.
  21. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/18/trump-epstein-fbi-durbin.html “Who made the decision to reassign hundreds of New York Field Office personnel to this March review of Epstein-related records?” Durbin asked in his letters. “Why were personnel told to flag records in which President Trump was mentioned?” he asked. An FBI spokesperson told CNBC in an email, “The FBI has no comment,” when asked about Durbin’s letters. ... Durbin said his office had learned that after that, the “FBI was pressured to put approximately 1,000 personnel in its Information Management Division … on 24-hour shifts to review approximately 100,000 Epstein-related records in order to produce more documents that could then be released on an arbitrarily short deadline.” “This effort, which reportedly took place from March 14 through the end of March, was haphazardly supplemented by hundreds of FBI New York Field Office personnel, many of whom lacked the expertise to identify statutorily-protected information regarding child victims and child witnesses or properly handle FOIA requests,” the letter said. “My office was told that these personnel were instructed to ‘flag’ any records in which President Trump was mentioned.”
  22. I wish that tattoos were outlawed. In the stands, I like the Italian women’s player in the NY Yankees cap. She’s cute. Their goal scorer is not so cute.
  23. There was not. I wouldn't hate it if they have Supergirl doing the trope next summer. Look Out!
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...