Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. That was pretty good
  3. Even if you’re fully on-board with this EO— surely you concede that children’s lit on these themes exist and that those books have been really influential one way or another, right? How are you supposed to teach a survey without bringing them up. It’s like if we decided we were big mad at, I don’t know, European national identity and said we couldn’t teach anything about it. And then said any survey course on 19th century European lit had to completely ignore books on those topics. It’s totally stupid and conflates understanding something with advocating for something (which I will grant you— understanding often leads to tolerance).
  4. That asshole is very good at getting paid mass amounts of money to do nothing. I’m extremely jealous.
  5. This is the hilarious part about all of the bootlickers lining up to embarrass themselves. “It’s a hoax, it’s clearly faked” etc. Yeah that’s from a 22 year-old book. A lot of this, unfortunately, would have gone away if Trump had just said “I think I just had someone do a doodle real quick and I signed it without paying attention. I don’t know what it means now and I didn’t back then either.” But, neither he nor his cult members operate that way, even when it’s really, really in his best interests to do so.
  6. I honestly wasn't aware of this, was there anything written about it?
  7. They are in big big trouble on offense. They are 130th in air yards per attempt. Many people excoriated Quinn and Sark for this last year. You tell me, do you think Stockton can hold Quinn's jock?
  8. True, the guy was the key to the offense without Yordan around. Amazing how no one altered their approach after his presence in taking pitches was gone.
  9. Cool. So answer this simple question: if literature that is part of a curriculum has a character that is trans, or of some other gender or sexual orientation, can the professor teaching on that book say "this character is trans?" Or must the professor simply pretend the character and their sexual orientation in the book don't exist? And remember, the edict you cited also goes to sexual orientation. So, if there is a gay character in a book, and their same-sex relationship is a part of the story, is the professor legally obligated to just redact those passages out of the book and not mention them? Because in these books, trans is definitely a thing that exists. Multiple genders - again, in books of YA fiction and such - is a thing that authors write about. Homosexuality definitely exists in some of these books. And by your take, and the governors, those things cannot be "taught" at all.
  10. Okay yeah, this makes a lot of sense now. lol
  11. What was his other option? It's hilarious that they had to state the obvious conclusion.
  12. Misconception. Kids are less horny than ever, and Elon is freaking out about it.
  13. If I lost the match, my opponent was cheating.
  14. Wordle 1,544 3/6* [emoji834][emoji834]🟩[emoji834][emoji834] 🟨[emoji834]🟩[emoji834][emoji834] 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
  15. Let's assume that all the girls became bleached blondes, and the illustrator's intent was to say that the girls from 1983 and the same ones in the 2003 picture. I think that's the most likely conclusion to draw. You are right that in 2003 they are all past the age of consent, but the only way those girls stayed in his life would've been if he was systematically grooming them for those 20 years, which is pretty fucking gross.
  16. Did you have any work on this one?
  17. Sure, but that's not what you said. You said the opposite of that: When someone says contradictory things in almost back to back posts, it's kind of hard to take anything they say at face value. Are you just an easy liar? Is it a communication issue, where you simply struggle to say what you mean? If it's that last one, I bet a better education could have helped out with that...
  18. The same group that let him stand up and pump his fist after getting shot instead of rushing him off the stage and to the hospital? Yeah, they're massively incompetent.
  19. Have you tried running the trail after dark? All of my female friends have stopped running after dark because it is not safe. and obligatroy In January 2024, a man named Seth Gott, 19, was attacked with a machete by a stranger on the Town Lake Trail near Auditorium Shores in Downtown Austin, Texas.
  20. Assuming that is true, what are you going to do with that knowledge? Like, are you someone with expertise and authority to be in a position to do anything about it? Or are you just a dude who likes to watch YouTube about UAP? And if it's really an internal technology that we possess but have been keeping quiet, how is it in our best interests to advertise our otherworldly amazeballs technology to the world? The government holds secrets all the time. Rightfully so. We don't release nuclear secrets because someone feels it's their right to know and screams about it on YouTube or in congress. Which also undermines that there is this vast government conspiracy to keep you (as important to the balance of the world as you apparently are) in the dark. When real secrets have been leaked, like how to make nukes to the USSR, the people doing the leaking weren't free to just keep posting YouTube videos about it. They were executed.
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...