Search the Community
Showing results for 'I'd pee in her butt'.
-
If i did, I'd be richer than Elon Musk
-
Just an fyi, there’s two state troopers that live in that shitbox town. And they’ll write their own mother a ticket on her birthday.
-
I travel for work. When I am not on the road, I work from home. There is a company location 4 miles from my house. Granted, we are empty nesters, and the only consideration is where my office would be. If you're gonna double my pay to go there instead of work from home time? LOL. Fuck yes, I'd do that. I'd probably do it for a 20-25% raise, so there's that too.
-
Compensation & WFH debate ($120K vs 240K)
Don Johnson replied to Nice Guy Eddie's topic in Daily Texan
I think I'd rather have the office job for $120k than the WFH for $240k. I don't know how you guys do it. -
Compensation & WFH debate ($120K vs 240K)
Anastasis replied to Nice Guy Eddie's topic in Daily Texan
I'd take the office job @240k and begin looking immediately for a WAH job to match the salary. -
I think the appeal lies in their being composites that create facial symmetry and smooth out (erase?) any signs of deformity, illness, idiosyncratic shit, other particulars, etc. Plus, the "models" are all supposedly the same young age (youth has its own inherent beauty), and I have no idea how they were selected or how many faces were used in each composite. Also, there aren't any fatties because there aren't any Americans. Are we still giving out grants to academics? Because I'd happily volunteer to update this study to replicate its findings, for the science, of course.
-
Compensation & WFH debate ($120K vs 240K)
Ghost of LL replied to Nice Guy Eddie's topic in Daily Texan
I don't agree with that at all. There are plenty of employers that are wildly successful with a WFH model. They have lower overhead as a result of paying less in rent and they can often pay lower wages. At the same time, they may not have any drop-off in productivity. That's particularly the case when the employees are doing piecework or when they're doing a job that has high levels of employer monitoring (e.g., call-center work). Once upon a time, airlines had reservations centers. They were large buildings across that country that housed hundreds of agents physically on the phones. I don't think any airline in America today has one; they're all WFH. And for that kind of thing, that makes a lot of sense for the airline. It doesn't have the expense of operating a reservation center (or a dozen reservations centers around the country). And pay for res agents hasn't increased nearly as much as it has for in-airport employees, owing to the supposed "benefit" of getting to WFH. But at the same time, a supervisor can listen in on the call just the same as they did when they were all in the same building. The number of calls an agent takes is logged. And all of the calls are recorded. So the employer gets the same productivity for less cost. And that's not unusual. I'd say that is the case for most white-collar jobs. It's just not the case for most professional jobs. -
Mine got a yes from Colorado State and some money to help try to sway us. Still waiting on CU and Colorado College. I'd imagine she'll get into the former and not the latter and the former won't offer any money. Got a no from Trinity which we pretty much expected. All the locals are covered so she has some good options.
-
My daughter got a yes from San Diego State and a no from Tennessee this week. Waiting on Clemson and South Carolina and a couple others still but SDSU will be hard to talk her out of. We still haven’t visited Fayetteville yet either.
-
I'd believe every one north of OK State. UH at 81% is some serious fucking comedy though.
-
Tickets sold (including student seating allotment paid for by student activity fees), not actual butts in seats.
-
Yeah, if it's like "work is 10 min away and I don't have to be there for 8 hours/day," I'd take $240k Run home at lunch, eat my food, walk the dog, go back to work Maybe only in the office like 9am - 3pm or something. With the rest being done at home. (Kind of what I do now)
-
Compensation & WFH debate ($120K vs 240K)
Ghost of LL replied to Nice Guy Eddie's topic in Daily Texan
I don't view it as "commitment" or "ambition." I think it is more an an experience thing. In my line of work--which is the line of work of seemingly 95% of the posters on this board--much of the mentoring that young people get is just absorbed as a consequnece of being in close proximity. Listening in on a phone call, hearing people talk in the halls or in the next office over, running into a colleague in the breakroom and asking what they're up to, walking into a supervisor's office and asking if there's something you can do on this case--that's how much of the most valuable mentoring gets done. I'm not saying that mentorship can't be done in a WFH environment. I am saying that it's really hard. And if both the mentor and the mentoree are not real conscientious about it, it's not happening. If I need to hire a third-year associate--adn I really need to hire a third-year associate, BTW--I'm 100% going to take an assciate who has been in the office over one who has been exclusively WFH over his/her career, all other things being equal. It's not because of what I percevie as commitment or work ethic; it's all about the mentorship and training that I think that lawyer has gotten at his/her previous job. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
Red Five replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
It was a special game, which I think is why she had her tits out. -
Compensation & WFH debate ($120K vs 240K)
Redneck Mutha replied to Nice Guy Eddie's topic in Daily Texan
My wife and I had this conversation the other day. Commute time would be the biggest factor for me. For example, we live in east Round Rock, so commuting to downtown Austin 5 days a week probably turns a 40 hour week into a 50 hour week, factoring in commute time. 500 extra hours per year sitting in traffic is life changing. Not to mention increased blood pressure, gas, tolls, insurance, parking, more vehicle maintenance, more money on work clothes, having to plan better for lunches and hope I could continue eating healthy, etc. So I think it would take double for me to make up for all those tangible costs. I'm not horribly far off from retirement so the comfort of working at home, listening to the music I want to listen to, not smelling a coworker's microwaved fish, setting my own schedule, showering when I want to shower, being at home for deliveries, the AC guy, the pest guy, whatever - all that has a big price tag. Now if the commute was 10 min from home? Yeah, I'd take the money. -
4.5 hours!! Think I'd rather ride on some sketchy carnie rides.
-
I had a vegetarian that worked for me. Except for bacon. She would eat a pond off a breakfast buffet. She justified by thinking pigs were vegetarians so it was ok. I never told her that a lot of pigs eat animals, snitches, gangsters, etc.
-
It's harder than you'd think on first pass. I drove into the office yesterday for a holiday party. It was an exercise in gratitude for not having to do that except for rare occassions. I can't go back to having to commute into a city center and work in an office and lose that time in commuting, etc. On the other hand if I only made $120k, I'd have to do it. I can't even get by on $240k so I'd hate to try on $120.
-
Compensation & WFH debate ($120K vs 240K)
KaiserSoze replied to Nice Guy Eddie's topic in Daily Texan
This is where I land. I certainly enjoy WFH but I'd be fine going back into an office regularly for 2x unless it was some ridiculous micromanaging situation with a shitty commute. -
I looked up and read this dogshit take by “JR Gamble” who I assume has been thawed out of some Nordic peat bog and is now offering his Cro-Magnon views on sports and society as some form of elaborate performance art. BLUF: It’s totally unfair that Michigan hasn’t fired this woman who was promoted above her rightful rank by the man she was having an affair with. Yeah, no shit— it turns out that screwing subordinates and giving them extra workplace consideration leaves institutions in an uncomfortable and precarious place once the merry go round of blowjobs and great performance evaluations stops. And you can’t just fire the people who got promotions that way. It’s almost like that’s exactly why managers are explicitly told DO NOT SLEEP WITH PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR YOU. And it’s almost like Sherrone could have avoided being victimized by simply not sleeping with women on his staff. We need an IQ test before people are allowed to publish on the internet, a simple shape rotation type thing before you can hit “submit.”
-
Hopefully we'll see a game similar to the 1991 Cotton Bowl. I'd love to see the 4Q crowd shots of 100,000+ Aggies who overpaid to see their team get shellacked.
-
Started watching the Fargo TV show and when I saw her and Plemons in Season 2 I knew it was going to be good. It was. She was excellent.
-
Have her get sick in a place like Japan or South Korea, just to have her mind blown.
-
She's got potential. Imagine feeding her a bottle of vodka then turning her loose on the SGA bastards at your high school reunion.
-
2025 Self Gratifying Fantasy Football thread
Doc Sam Beckett replied to Baboontyme's topic in Gambling
I'd probably roll Stanford, but for some reason I also think Denver and Jax is going to be a game. Goff or Burrow for me. I have the same two guys, plus 3 others that I think are good enough to start. St Brown and Evans I'm locked in starting. Right now I'm rolling with Flowers and Meyers over Smith. I hate Smith's boom/bust games, but I also need a big week, so I'm considering him for either Flowers or Meyers, but not Evans.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... COOKIE MONSTER!