Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for 'I'd pee in her butt'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Sports
    • Football
    • 🤫$9.95🤫
    • Basketball
    • Baseball
    • Other Sports
    • Gambling
  • Entertainment
    • Movies and TV
    • Music
    • Hobbies
    • Lulz
    • Food and Travel
  • News & Business
    • Daily Texan
    • Cloak Room
    • Business and Markets
    • You Can't Sit With US
  • Other
    • Can You Help Me With This?
    • Best Buy Coupons
    • Please do this better?
    • Surly 1%
    • Purgatory

Product Groups

  • Big Donor Area
  • Buy TreeFiddy for a friend
  • Burnt Ends
    • Merch
  • Surly Horns NIL Slush Fund
  • Tailgate Donation + Payments

Categories

  • Firings
  • 2020 Hires
  • 2020 Season
  • 2021 Season
  • 2022 Season
  • 2023 Season
  • Football

Categories

  • Movies and TV
  • Music
  • Hobbies
    • Video Games
  • Lulz

Categories

  • Basketball
  • Baseball
  • Other Sports
    • Futbol
  • Gambling

Categories

  • Daily Texan
  • 6th Street Journal

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


  1. I think every Texas fan is eager to see how Miller and the new regime settle in. They seem to be on the right track already. But to me, our ongoing fan "interest" in Shaka is because of just how massive a fraud he continues to be. The guy failed at least as spectacularly as Terry but then was given a free pass by media still trying to paint him as a great coach who got a raw deal from us ignorant ingrates at Texas. If the media would instead start portraying the guy as the overrated charlatan he actually is, I'd feel far less inclined to keep celebrating his stumbles.
  2. Mark Levin making fun of Megyn Kelly for her "limited vocabulary" while shilling daily for Trump. Oi vey.
  3. Also, this bears quoting. Because....for real. I would suspect that most of my peers would give an answer along the lines of "I guess the technical answer is she's gotta be at least 18, but man....I'd feel creepy AF to be with a gal who wasn't at least out of college/in her mid 20s/is in her 30s even." For most of us, there's kind of a hard barrier that's tied into the age of our daughter, if we have one. My daughter is in her mid-20s. Make me single tomorrow, and I STILL couldn't imagine myself being with one of her friends. Dude. No. But Trump? Jesus. That his mind even went there. "I wouldn't go as low as 12" are words that should never come out of any non-sick fuck's mouth. The concepts of "sex" and "12 year olds" shouldn't ever exist in your brain at the same time.
  4. More than a fashionista she is an influencer. I said it a few pages back but might as well send her to Mumbai. Dolphins and Giants are possibly looking, if Loreal was calling the shots 💯 that's where they'd go.
  5. I just stepped out to get the milk and a pack of Marlboro reds *walks out of bedroom smoking a cigarette in my boxers* “Your mom’s resting little guy, she’s earned a break after what we just did. Do you know where your mom keeps her purse? How about we play some madden and get some Pizza Hut”
  6. I hope he does pardon her. It's going to cause the more outrage than anything he has ever done while in office. It will ratchet the pressure up on Republicans an astronomical amount. The Epstein scandal is finally the thing he can't shrug off because it's both horrifying and easy to understand.
  7. First thought would be, Why does she have a nipple on her knee? Second thought would be, Is she pregnant?
  8. Don't tell me she puts beans in her chili....
  9. I'm with you on bologna. I couldn't stomach that Oscar Meyer crap when I was growing up in the 70's but damn if I didn't love the potted meats (Deviled ham and chicken) and I'd eat a whole canister of Vienna sausages if you'd let me. Mortadella is insanely good, especially when it's pan-fried and used in a sandwich.
  10. If Steve does depart will-he nill-he, there isn't going to be a massive buyout, but the Mutually Acceptable Preservation of our Good Name parting agreement will fund a couple of years' rent on her Casa Loreal.
  11. To equate Sark today with UW Sark, you have to pretty uncritically accept all the rumors. Nicole cued me in on her source and info a while back (Loreal being a whore, basically) and I'll admit it's credible enough to be true, but is still unverified as is most of the other shit spewed on this thread.
  12. I'm not gonna research anything L'Oreal does or says. She appears to be more trouble than she's worth. Sark is a cuck for keeping her around.
  13. Sorry, I don't know where dedicated dog parking is on campus. You might just have to bring her to the tailgate.
  14. This pisses me off. These are mostly female majority positions and this is specifically trying to keep them out of professional positions and back in the kitchen. My wife is a PA and, while it won’t affect her, it definitely hurts the profession as a whole.
  15. Has this been said/asked.. her house is Uncle Hank's house right?
  16. How big of her, ‘Christian’ right? Sorry Man, family can suck worse than friends.
  17. Username checks out. I'd go with Whataburger if they had it here. I think I'd have to go with Jack or Sonic because of the variety and they both have breakfast too. I am really craving a good sandwich for lunch now after catching up on that thread and then being reminded of Potbelly's on this thread.
  18. Came out of breakfast to see this dipshit parked next to my elderly mother's car. I had to climb in and move her car for her.
  19. The below "Guest Essay" is a short analysis of the situation from a senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, writing from Venezuela. It sure sounds like an echo of the debates we had this summer about invading Iran and potentially toppling its government. Are those who advocated regime change in Iran on board with regime change in Venezuela? Are supporters of the regime in DC cool with the "Donroe Doctrine" which appears no different than Russia bullying all the neighbors in its "sphere of influence." Since January, we've threatened the sovereignty of Canada, Mexico, Panama, Greenland, and now Venezuela. Y'all see this, right? And, as always, regime change = "We break it; we buy it." In one way or another, we'll end up being responsible for the mess, eventually. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/opinion/venezuela-trump-maduro-machado-regime-change.html Caracas, Venezuela’s neglected but beautiful capital, sits behind a forested, over 9,000-foot tall mountain that obscures the city’s proximity to the sea. From the summit, on a clear day, the Caribbean looks close enough to touch. Out there, over the horizon, like a scattering of toys in a bathtub, floats a good portion of the U.S. Fourth Fleet, packing enough lethal hardware in Tomahawk missiles alone to level large parts of the city. B-52H strategic bombers and supersonic F-35 stealth fighters have prowled the edge of the country’s territorial waters. There are also signs of President Nicolás Maduro’s response to the American military buildup. Along the highway that winds up to the capital from the coast, the Venezuelan military has placed concrete tank traps beside the tarmac, presumably at the ready in case the amphibious assault group onboard the U.S.S. Iwo Jima should attempt a landing. Perhaps it’s the mountain that stands in the way of the American military swarm, or maybe it’s their feeling that there’s so little to be done about it, but caraqueños are, for now, going about their normal business. If the traffic is less snarled than it once was, if the restaurants aren’t as full, it has less to do with the specter of war than with Venezuela’s hyperinflation and a repressive security apparatus. Even down at the coast, the American military menace is treated mostly with typical Venezuelan ribaldry, rather than dread. “Have you heard?” people ask each other, jokingly. “The Marines have arrived!” For all the deadly weapons floating off the coast, it seems increasingly clear that all the Trump administration’s push for regime change in Venezuela has done so far is create a potentially disastrous political trap. If the administration fails to oust Mr. Maduro, as is its apparent goal, that will almost certainly grant the dictator a political victory and deal a lasting blow to the Venezuelan opposition. If it succeeds, and Mr. Maduro finally falls, it may plunge the nation, already in crisis, into a potentially violent breakdown. No matter what happens, everyone loses. Over the past few weeks, the forward momentum of the U.S. aggression seemed — temporarily at least — to have stalled. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the driving force behind the thrust for regime change, has played down the possibility of a ground invasion. The recent arrival of the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Gerald R. Ford and its battle group in the Caribbean, and reports of a flurry of meetings in Washington, led to some frantic speculation that the long-awaited ground strikes were imminent. But President Trump’s subsequent statement that the administration “may be having some discussions with Maduro” let the air out of the balloon once again. Mr. Rubio has a close, longstanding connection to the uncompromising faction of the Venezuelan opposition headed by the Nobel Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado, who is currently in hiding. He is also keen to rid the hemisphere of leftist dictators. If we are then to take Mr. Rubio’s recent comments and Mr. Trump’s stated aversion to foreign military entanglements at face value — not to mention that of the MAGA base — the administration appears to be engaged in a kind of phony war: one that doesn’t require American boots on Venezuelan soil, but that is convincing enough either to scare Mr. Maduro into fleeing or to persuade his own military to topple him. Ms. Machado and her closest allies have for years tried to persuade outside powers — the United States in particular — to intervene militarily against the Maduro regime, with little success. Mr. Trump’s return to office offered a fresh opportunity. Ms. Machado and her allies sought to build a case that Mr. Maduro posed a clear and present danger to the United States, rooted in three issues that resonated with the Trump administration: drugs, migration and terrorism. There is no public evidence to support the claim that Mr. Maduro is the head of a military-run drug cartel, but it contains enough half-truths to make it politically useful. The gunboat diplomacy the Trump administration may have hoped would be a shortcut to bloodless regime change does not appear to be working. Mr. Maduro could well be losing sleep over the possibility of a targeted strike, a Special Operations snatch squad or even a full-scale intervention; he claims to have mobilized millions of militia members. But the safest outcome for those in Mr. Maduro’s inner circle is to remain in power. Any officers who might be privately keen to overthrow him would be reluctant to install Ms. Machado, their sworn enemy, in the presidency, and know full well the fate that awaits them if they fall afoul of Mr. Maduro’s security services. As the world awaits Mr. Trump’s next move, there are broadly speaking two main directions this could go. Either the U.S. fleet disperses, presumably after demonstrating its firepower on some terrestrial targets as a token show of force, and leaves Mr. Maduro in power, or the Trump administration succeeds in toppling the government, with or without landing U.S. troops on Venezuelan soil. n the first scenario, Mr. Maduro would benefit from having faced down “the empire,” as he calls it, and walk away with even more internal authority than before. Ousting Mr. Maduro could prove even more costly. Unless Ms. Machado and her allies have an unlikely secret transition deal with key figures in the Venezuelan military, whose cohesion and loyalty would be critical to maintaining internal security if Mr. Maduro goes, a swift ouster could produce a power vacuum. That, in turn, could lead to an open-ended internal conflict waged by armed groups resistant to change. Without the commitment of a huge U.S. military force to guarantee internal security — and a sustained diplomatic effort by Washington to back a political transition — Mr. Maduro’s ouster could usher in protracted, bloody chaos that would likely spill over Venezuela’s porous borders. Ms. Machado and the opposition leadership risk paying a heavy price in either scenario. Having placed all her chips on an external intervention, her domestic credibility will suffer if U.S. force fails. If that happens, the Venezuelan government might not wish to jail her, and thereby make a martyr of a Nobel Peace Prize winner. It might prefer to let her deflate on her own, ideally in exile, where she would be less of a political irritant. If Mr. Maduro falls, but is replaced by a crony, that successor might be less reluctant to have Ms. Machado arrested. Either way, the long, painful struggle to restore the rights of Venezuelans will have suffered a severe setback. Having outsourced its strategy to a foreign power, the Venezuelan opposition can, for now, do little but brace for impact. When the American fleet sails away and the world’s attention turns elsewhere, they will be left — as the local saying goes — to pick up the broken plates.
  20. Time to give her some of that ole Underdog charm
  21. If the peace agreement is poorly translated from Russian and the phrasing only works in Russian, then it's clear that on the American side, we didn't even bother to read it fully, absorb its meaning, and put it into "our own words," so to speak. This is a lazy (and desperate) copy/paste job from the Kremlin. As to the specifics, why are there no stipulations on the size of the Russian military or with whom they can align militarily, like, say, Iran, China, or North Korea? If NATO can't have soldiers in Ukraine, why can Russia keep troops in Belarus? I mean, if the purpose of neutering Ukraine's military and not having Western soldiers in Ukraine is to create a "neutral buffer" for security, then we should demand the full withdrawal of Russian troops from Belarus. Or shit, if I were at the negotiating table and Russia insisted Ukraine give up land, then I'd insist that Russia should give up Kaliningrad Königsberg and maybe transfer ownership over to Ukraine. If this is all about security and clean boundaries between the West and the East, and Ukraine is just "pawn in game of life," then let's go all in. This world's greatest dealmaker we have sure seems shitty at serious negotiations.
  22. Cruz has been getting his daughter to try and sacrifice herself for years now, just by being her dad.
  23. First time? Sark Fan Bois are pretty salty as you can see. I thought Sark was a 7.5/10 hire and have proven to be right honestly. Even in his two great years, he got a couple of lucky breaks. Do I think our on-field performance this year warrants a change? No chance. Not sure Lane is worth the upgrade but do I think he's better? Yeah. I'd take Lanning, Cignetti, etc over him. Probably don't want to compare him to aggy Elko if you're a Sark boi
  24. They've been mad at her since their father died. Shit, if your own father knew you were incompetent to a point where he didnt give you control of a family asset why should anyone outside care if you're mad? Take your portion of the 10B and get the fuck out. No one is going to give you that kind of money and still allow you to have any control of the asset anyway. Go get your hookers and coke and retire.
×
×
  • Create New...