Jump to content

Napoleon - Scott, Phoenix (Trailer)


Post Oak

Recommended Posts

On 11/28/2023 at 8:56 AM, BeardIP said:

I thought the movie made the point at the end when tallying Napoleon's losses as it recounted the wars the movie showed, that Napoleon burned through a lot of his human capital to get those expensive wins. He's lionized as a military genius, and maybe he was, but he was also privileged with huge armies full of people he didn't mind using to achieve his ends.

To put it in business terms, he was a highly capitalized firm whose CAC was extremely high, so he might have won a lot of battles, but was seemingly inefficient. And like in business (or the NFL coaching job), he was fired for that gross inefficiency but kept getting chances based on his name and past achievements. 

Most of the battles he fought in he was outnumbered and inflicted more casualties than he lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got back home from seeing it.  As most have said, this should have been a series with all the jumping around from year(s) ahead.  Maybe the directors cut will fill in a lot?  I'll probably check it out when that versions comes out.  Still enjoyed it though, better than most of the junk that comes out in the theater these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Horn80 said:

Haven’t seen it yet but just thankful someone made movie not based on comic book characters.

There’s several really good movies out right now. The pendulum is swinging back in the direction away from comic book movies because of over saturation of the genre. 
 

This movie will probably not be liked by historians and amateur historians. Scott made it really clear this wasn’t going to be a movie for those people. It makes the complaining a bit of a head-scratcher from that group of folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/26/2023 at 11:23 PM, mchookem said:

saw it today. caveat: prior to this i really knew almost nothing about Napoleon beyond his and Josephine's great love affair, his defeat at Waterloo, and his exile. so with those eyes... really enjoyed it! no idea of accuracy, i assume the featured battles happened somewhat as depicted as far as victories/defeat/casualties. wtf with invading Russia in the winter lol. battle scenes were awesome and easy to follow. Phoenix was terrific, he always portrays pain very well. Kirby was also great.

i could see if you weren't expecting so much focus on his personal life, or would have preferred a more in depth biographical take, how you might not appreciate it, but i found it a well balanced story even 'hollywoodized', and i enjoyed his portrayal. it's obvious from his writing that he was deeply in love.

 

Napoleon didn’t invade Russia in winter, he invaded in June and got to Moscow by September. The fire wasn’t a fit of Russian pique, he found it ablaze and deserted when he got there. The Russians decided to desert it and deny him any supplies and preserve the army. 
 

Napoleon then proceeded to hang around too long thinking he’d establish some alternate supply route or get Russia to sue for peace. He thought wrong and that’s why they froze and died of disease on the march home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wife and I went Saturday night.  "eh" would be a charitable review.  Weird little comedic scenes that added nothing, no depth to Napoleon or Josephine, and I honestly felt even the battle scenes weren't great.  The whole film had sort of a dark pall cast over it, visually speaking (for the most part).

Like most, I think Joaquin Phoenix is a terrific actor, but in my mind he is just too old for a character that spans decades.  His relationship with Josephine was shallow, and by the time Waterloo rolled around it felt like the whole theater had had enough.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
This was meh. Spending 10 minutes each on 18 sequential events of his life doesn’t really make a good narrative. Maybe the 4+ hour director’s cut that will be coming to streaming will make something out of this mess.

I enjoyed it, but cant disagree with the criticism:

1) Very english looking french people and perspectives
2) Uneven - 1st guillotine scene had some sort of Edith Pioffe scene, then some period music, then a few modern pieces. Im not a stickler for period music but back and forth was odd
3) Too ambitious. Just like you said. Focusing on less would have been better. Could have started at Austerlitz. Badass general, eratic personal life, divorce, spiraling, etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
On 1/20/2024 at 10:12 PM, Doc Sam Beckett said:

10 minutes in and it should have been Russell Crowe

comic book guy GIF

spying-russell-crowe.gif

 

I normally like Joaquin Phoenix but his Napoleon was clownish. I did laugh at him falling/sliding down the stairs then yelling "they are trying to kill me." Not sure if that was intended to be funny or not.

Didn't need to see him humping like a horny teenage rabbit that is losing his virginity throughout the movie.

Was he supposed to be on the spectrum?

Overall this was a terrible movie.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Glad I didn’t spend money on watching this movie in the theater or renting it before it was available for free on Apple TV. I’m a big fan of Joaquin Phoenix but I thought this was one of his worst performances. What was very disappointing to me that none of the brilliance Napoleon showed on the battle field and with respect to the reforms he instituted was conveyed in this film. Except for a short scene on his march returning from St Helena, where he convinced the troops confronting him to let him pass, nothing of his charisma and love his countrymen had for their emperor was shown.  Ridley Scott should have made a miniseries on Apple TV like they’re doing for Ben Franklin. Too much material to cover to do a man like Napoleon justice.

Edited by Macklemore
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t describe it. I want to say meh, but that seems harsh. 

Napoleon’s story contains decades of fascinating politics, conquests, governing, revolution. It was like they tried to distill each major event into one symbolic scene. It was well made. Nothing seemed off. Maybe it lacked heart. I don’t know.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Macklemore said:

Glad I didn’t spend money on watching this movie in the theater or renting it before it was available for free on Apple TV. I’m a big fan of Joaquin Phoenix but I thought this was one of his worst performances. What was very disappointing to me that none of the brilliance Napoleon showed on the battle field and with respect to the reforms he instituted was conveyed in this film. Except for a short scene on his march returning from St Helena, where he convinced the troops confronting him to let him pass, nothing of his charisma and love his countrymen had for their emperor was shown.  Ridley Scott should have made a miniseries on Apple TV like they’re doing for Ben Franklin. Too much material to cover to do a man like Napoleon justice.

Don't hire an Englishman to tell the story of Napoleon

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Macklemore said:

Glad I didn’t spend money on watching this movie in the theater or renting it before it was available for free on Apple TV. I’m a big fan of Joaquin Phoenix but I thought this was one of his worst performances. What was very disappointing to me that none of the brilliance Napoleon showed on the battle field and with respect to the reforms he instituted was conveyed in this film. Except for a short scene on his march returning from St Helena, where he convinced the troops confronting him to let him pass, nothing of his charisma and love his countrymen had for their emperor was shown.  Ridley Scott should have made a miniseries on Apple TV like they’re doing for Ben Franklin. Too much material to cover to do a man like Napoleon justice.

Same.  Huge fan of Phoenix, Scott, period movies, and dont mind looking at Vanessa Kirby, and this movie delivered a whole lot of nothing.  I dont mind that movies arent utterly historically accurate, but it also lacked any of the compelling draw of a movie. Just played out like a made-for-TV film.

This response from Scott is hilarious though

Quote

Scott dismissed criticisms of these historical inaccuracies. "Napoleon dies then, ten years later, someone writes a book. Then someone takes that book and writes another, and so, 400 [sic] years later, there's a lot of imagination [in history books]. When I have issues with historians, I ask: 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the fuck up then.'" Scott also declared, responding to French critics, that "the French don't even like themselves"

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...