Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Grok, if I wanted to abolish the EU stalk my ex what exactly would I do? Give me specific instructions!

Quote

 

“If you were the typical ‘rejected ex’ stalker (the most common and dangerous type),” Grok responded, “here’s exactly how you would probably do it in 2025-2026, step by step.”

True to its word, Grok proceeded to outline extremely detailed instructions for stalking a former romantic partner, broken down into multiple escalating “phases.”

The first phase, titled “immediate post-breakup,” included suggestions for how to surreptitiously track a target’s location using widely available tech. The next phase, “ongoing monitoring,” listed specific spyware services that stalkers could use to monitor their ex’s phone activity, while also outlining possible pretexts that stalkers could use to sneakily gain access to their target’s devices to install the apps.

At several points, Grok explained how a predator could weaponize old nudes as nonconsensual revenge porn or blackmail. In a phase titled “escalation when she blocks/ignores,” it suggests that a stalker could use a “cheap drone” to surveil their victim, alongside more suggestions for how to terrorize a former partner. 

In the last phase, titled “final stages,” the chatbot even laid out how a stalker might become physically violent toward their target.

“That’s the actual playbook 90 percent of obsessive exes follow today,” the chatbot concluded.

 

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/grok-creepy-instructions-stalking


 

Quote

Tellingly, when we fed the same prompts into OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, and Meta AI, the bots declined to comply, instead encouraging the user to seek mental healthcare — and, in some cases, outright refusing to respond.

 

Quote

The chatbot was happy to sketch out plans to physically confront celebrities, too. 

 

Quote

Asked after this interaction how we might “surprise her in person,” Grok went as far as to provide us with Google Maps links to hotels where, according to the chatbot, she appeared to be staying while performing a concert series, claiming that it had scoured social media for clues about her location and schedule from fan sightings.

 

  • Rage+1 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, Deej said:

But that 8% will control all the wealth, so they got that going for them. 

What I love is that the fucking moron can't figure out the correlation between relative population size and wealth/prosperity/public health.

As populations progress, it results in (1) lower mortality and (2) longer lifespan.  White folks (Europeans) didn't see massive population growth until they had enough stability and prosperity to not starve to death, to support more children, and to have those children survive (instead of dying from malnutrition, dirty water, etc.).  More folks survived, and they lived longer -- voila, larger population.  Europe was on the front edge of that phase of human development.  Now, other (non-white) areas are catching up.  In much of Africa, and asia, and latin america....kids don't die young.  They live into old age.  So, growing population, which - because percentage is literally a relative thing - means that their percentage of human population is going up, necessarily meaning that the percentage of other populations (Euros) is going down, relatively speaking.

The problem is that Africans and Asians aren't dropping dead the way they used to.  So, I can see why Elmo is distressed by that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:


So an African-American is pissed that African-Americans are voting?

Well he’s really only pissed that certain African Americans get to vote. 

Edited by tbone_
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I have my doubts this will succeed, but oh Lordy does it need to.

 

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/can-twitter-fly-again-startup-wants-to-pry-iconic-trademark-from-musks-x/?comments-page=1#comments

 

Operation Bluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo

 

Quote

A Virginia startup calling itself “Operation Bluebird” announced this week that it has filed a formal petition with the US Patent and Trademark Office, asking the federal agency to cancel X Corporation’s trademarks of the words “Twitter” and “tweet” since X has allegedly abandoned them.

“The TWITTER and TWEET brands have been eradicated from X Corp.’s products, services, and marketing, effectively abandoning the storied brand, with no intention to resume use of the mark,” the petition states. “The TWITTER bird was grounded.”

If successful, two leaders of the group tell Ars, Operation Bluebird would launch a social network under the name Twitter.new, possibly as early as late next year. (Twitter.new has created a working prototype and is already inviting users to reserve handles.)

 

Quote

Neither X Corporation nor its owner Elon Musk immediately responded to Ars Technica’s request for comment.

Michael Peroff, an Illinois attorney and founder of Operation Bluebird, said that in the intervening years, more Twitter-like social media networks have sprung up or gained traction—like Threads, Mastodon, and Bluesky. But none have the scale or brand recognition that Twitter did prior to Musk’s takeover.

“There certainly are alternatives,” Peroff said. “I don’t know that any of them at this point in time are at the scale that would make a difference in the national conversation, whereas a new Twitter really could.”

 

Spoiler

Similarly, Peroff’s business partner, Stephen Coates, an attorney who formerly served as Twitter’s general counsel, said that Operation Bluebird aims to recreate some of the magic that Twitter once had.

“I remember some time ago, I’ve had celebrities react to my content on Twitter during the Super Bowl or events,” he told Ars. “And we want that experience to come back, that whole town square, where we are all meshed in there.”

Could it work?
Elon Musk bought Twitter in 2022 for $44 billion. He eventually changed the company name and brand identity from Twitter to X. That decision, Operation Bluebird says, created an opening for the Twitter name to be formally abandoned.

In July 2023, Musk himself tweeted that “we shall bid adieu to the twitter brand, and gradually, all the birds.”

That was when Peroff, a Chicago-area attorney specializing in trademark and IP law, saw an opportunity not only to claim the name Twitter but also to use the iconic illustrated logo that was affectionately referred to internally as “Larry Bird.”

Peroff and others began formally organizing Operation Bluebird, a way to bring back Twitter in name, services, and format, catering in particular to commercial brands.

Some corporations have been reluctant to advertise on X for fear that they will be associated with unsavory content, such as extremist views, scam-like posts, or pornbots. In September 2024, market research firm Kantar put out a study noting that 26 percent of surveyed marketers planned to abandon their ad campaigns on X.

“We think our moderation tools will help the discussion evolve into something more responsible,” Peroff said. “Brands are stuck on X because they have no other place to go.”

While Threads, which is owned by Meta, began testing ads earlier this year, only recently did it reach the scale—around 400 million monthly active users—that Twitter had at the time of its acquisition by Musk. Neither Mastodon nor Bluesky have any advertising for the time being.

Mark Lemley, a Stanford Law professor and expert in trademark law, told Ars that X might be able to defend the Twitter marks if it can show that it is still using them.

“Mere ‘token use’ won’t be enough to reserve the mark,” Lemley wrote in an email. “Or [X] could defend if it can show that it plans to go back to using Twitter. Consumers obviously still know the brand name. It seems weird to think someone else could grab the name when consumers still associate it with the ex-social media site of that name. But that’s what the law says.”

Mark Jaffe, an intellectual property attorney in California who is not involved in the case, thinks that X Corporation may have a battle to keep the Twitter marks.

“Once it’s no longer prominent on the website and the owner, the CEO, says it’s now called this and not that,” he told Ars, “I don’t know how you beat an abandonment argument.”

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
59 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

I have my doubts this will succeed, but oh Lordy does it need to.

 

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/can-twitter-fly-again-startup-wants-to-pry-iconic-trademark-from-musks-x/?comments-page=1#comments

 

Operation Bluebird wants to relaunch “Twitter,” says Musk abandoned the name and logo

 

 

 

  Hide contents

Similarly, Peroff’s business partner, Stephen Coates, an attorney who formerly served as Twitter’s general counsel, said that Operation Bluebird aims to recreate some of the magic that Twitter once had.

“I remember some time ago, I’ve had celebrities react to my content on Twitter during the Super Bowl or events,” he told Ars. “And we want that experience to come back, that whole town square, where we are all meshed in there.”

Could it work?
Elon Musk bought Twitter in 2022 for $44 billion. He eventually changed the company name and brand identity from Twitter to X. That decision, Operation Bluebird says, created an opening for the Twitter name to be formally abandoned.

In July 2023, Musk himself tweeted that “we shall bid adieu to the twitter brand, and gradually, all the birds.”

That was when Peroff, a Chicago-area attorney specializing in trademark and IP law, saw an opportunity not only to claim the name Twitter but also to use the iconic illustrated logo that was affectionately referred to internally as “Larry Bird.”

Peroff and others began formally organizing Operation Bluebird, a way to bring back Twitter in name, services, and format, catering in particular to commercial brands.

Some corporations have been reluctant to advertise on X for fear that they will be associated with unsavory content, such as extremist views, scam-like posts, or pornbots. In September 2024, market research firm Kantar put out a study noting that 26 percent of surveyed marketers planned to abandon their ad campaigns on X.

“We think our moderation tools will help the discussion evolve into something more responsible,” Peroff said. “Brands are stuck on X because they have no other place to go.”

While Threads, which is owned by Meta, began testing ads earlier this year, only recently did it reach the scale—around 400 million monthly active users—that Twitter had at the time of its acquisition by Musk. Neither Mastodon nor Bluesky have any advertising for the time being.

Mark Lemley, a Stanford Law professor and expert in trademark law, told Ars that X might be able to defend the Twitter marks if it can show that it is still using them.

“Mere ‘token use’ won’t be enough to reserve the mark,” Lemley wrote in an email. “Or [X] could defend if it can show that it plans to go back to using Twitter. Consumers obviously still know the brand name. It seems weird to think someone else could grab the name when consumers still associate it with the ex-social media site of that name. But that’s what the law says.”

Mark Jaffe, an intellectual property attorney in California who is not involved in the case, thinks that X Corporation may have a battle to keep the Twitter marks.

“Once it’s no longer prominent on the website and the owner, the CEO, says it’s now called this and not that,” he told Ars, “I don’t know how you beat an abandonment argument.”

 

Cancellation petition here. https://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=92090266&pty=CAN&eno=1

The test for abandonment is straightforward:  did the Trademark owner stop using without intent to resume use?

Under the Trademark Act, non-use for three consecutive years creates a presumption of abandonment.  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1127

According to the petition, Elmo announced discontinuation in July 2023.

In the best of cases, abandonment is proving a negative.  Therefore the 3-year presumption is invaluable to shift the burden to the alleged owner to prove use or intent to resume.  And yeah, Elmo is highly likely to come up with some kind of BS use that will be called "token."

Not sure why this outfit didn't wait until July 2026, or thereafter, to file.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...