Jump to content

The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate U.S. Companies (Apple, Amazon)


clapclapclap

Recommended Posts

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies

The attack by Chinese spies reached almost 30 U.S. companies, including Amazon and Apple, by compromising America’s technology supply chain, according to extensive interviews with government and corporate sources....

-999x-999.gif

iPPcoke XS Mini

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worked on our Dept of State account for about five years (2007-12) and State IT was always asking for schematics of our products they purchased through the Tempest contractors.  I presumed they were auditing units to compare designed product versus finished product.  But when you get right down to it, all of the components that went into our product(s) were sourced from any number if different manufacturers, most of them located in Asia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, NeverMarryAStripper said:

We should just go ahead and start teaching Mandarin in elementary school 

I get the PC element, but I have always wondered why we spend so much money teaching our kids Spanish while the rest of the world is learning English and Mandarin. #noracist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, El Diablo said:

Remember when we let Soviet contractors build our embassy and the whole thing had to be torn down because it was full of spy gear/bugs/listening devices? I member.

Don't trust your sensitive shit with foreign powers.

No shit. Capt. Obvious, but this never has made sense to me. Hey Marcus, let's outsource our key technology to a country that wants to destroy us. Kind of important to have a manufacturing infrastructure whether technology or equipment.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No shit - then let foeign nationals work in sensitive technology facilities here in the US.

It seems the US science community is clueless about national security, or they really believe in the globalist nonsense.

Edited by Armybrat
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be a big cloud of skepticism growing around the Bloomberg article. Apple and Amazon the victims in the Bloomberg report are denying the claims Bloomberg is making. So far, no one has been able to confirm any evidence of actual tampering occurred. Bloomberg has yet to provide any technical details on this alleged hack.

China would be shooting themselves in the foot if they did mess with the supply chain as Bloomberg claims. They could potentially lose billions of dollars in manufacturing business. Supermicro's stock dropped by 50% today.

Now I am wondering if Bloomberg fucked up bigly or something else is at play here.

 

Here is a good summary of the events that have taken place.

https://medium.com/@thegrugq/supply-chain-security-speculation-b7b6357a5d05

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, F250 said:

There seems to be a big cloud of skepticism growing around the Bloomberg article. Apple and Amazon the victims in the Bloomberg report are denying the claims Bloomberg is making. So far, no one has been able to confirm any evidence of actual tampering occurred. Bloomberg has yet to provide any technical details on this alleged hack.

China would be shooting themselves in the foot if they did mess with the supply chain as Bloomberg claims. They could potentially lose billions of dollars in manufacturing business. Supermicro's stock dropped by 50% today.

Now I am wondering if Bloomberg fucked up bigly or something else is at play here.

 

Here is a good summary of the events that have taken place.

https://medium.com/@thegrugq/supply-chain-security-speculation-b7b6357a5d05

Apple and Amazon have plenty of reasons to deny the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kyle said:

No shit. Capt. Obvious, but this never has made sense to me. Hey Marcus, let's outsource our key technology to a country that wants to destroy us. Kind of important to have a manufacturing infrastructure whether technology or equipment.

Quote

Donald Trump’s senior national security officials said they were speaking for the president when they stood together in the White House Thursday and vowed to combat ongoing Russian cyber meddling.

But Trump himself remained silent.

In an unusual appearance in the White House briefing room, several top security and intelligence chiefs accused Moscow of ongoing influence operations, ranging from social media disinformation campaigns to attempts to hack political targets and infiltrate the country’s electoral infrastructure.

“We continue to see a pervasive messaging campaign by Russia to try to weaken and divide the United States,” Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats told reporters at the White House. "We're throwing everything at it.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kyle said:

I get the PC element, but I have always wondered why we spend so much money teaching our kids Spanish while the rest of the world is learning English and Mandarin. #noracist

There is no "PC element."  People want to learn Mandarin if they think it will benefit them (or their children) financially in the future.  No other reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Schulz2.0 said:

Apple and Amazon have plenty of reasons to deny the story.

They do. But the denials by Apple and Amazon are pretty specific rather than the usual vague denials. I am not sure who to believe at the moment.

An interesting update on this is Brittain's  GCHQ is backing up the denials being made by Apple and Amazon.

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1MF1DN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kyle said:

NSIS.

My PC point is that schools waste way too many resources IMHO teaching Spanish vs. a useful language like Mandarin.

There's more than one definition of "useful." I hear Spanish every day.  Not so much an Chinese.  Could be Cantonese.  Or Mandarin.  Or Szechuan.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Languages were taught in high school not so much for the purpose of actually learning that language, but for general education purposes and for the insight it gives a student on the English language.  Which is why Latin was taught (still may be) for so many years.

Spanish, French, and German were added just as a nod to modernity, not because they are more practical than Latin.

Asian languages offer almost no insight whatsoever on the English language.  So it may be more practical, but I'm not sure that was ever the pedagogical point.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kyle said:

I get the PC element, but I have always wondered why we spend so much money teaching our kids Spanish while the rest of the world is learning English and Mandarin. #noracist

Also, you might think US kids will grow up and be doing big business with the Chinese with their Mandarin speaking skilzz but they won't.  It will be the the 1st generation kids of Chinese immigrants who taught them at home.  Gringo kids don't have a chance . . .

Besides, who cares about Mandarin, anyway.  If you're doing business in China it's going to be with US rules and US contracts.  Would you sing a deal with a foreigner with a language you don't fully understand?  And one with no respect for intellectual property?  The whole Mandarin thing is wishful thinking.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

Also, you might think US kids will grow up and be doing big business with the Chinese with their Mandarin speaking skilzz but they won't.  It will be the the 1st generation kids of Chinese immigrants who taught them at home.  Gringo kids don't have a chance . . .

Besides, who cares about Mandarin, anyway.  If you're doing business in China it's going to be with US rules and US contracts.  Would you sing a deal with a foreigner with a language you don't fully understand?  And one with no respect for intellectual property?  The whole Mandarin thing is wishful thinking.  

Well, they might be contracts in English with nominally American rules, but the azns gon azn and ignore all of it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kyle said:

NSIS.

My PC point is that schools waste way too many resources IMHO teaching Spanish vs. a useful language like Mandarin.

You statement implies Spanish isn't useful. Do you even NAFTA/USMCA, bro. Seriously, there is a lot of benefits to speaking Spanish if you do business in Mexico, Central America or South America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, F250 said:

You statement implies Spanish isn't useful. Do you even NAFTA/USMCA, bro. Seriously, there is a lot of benefits to speaking Spanish if you do business in Mexico, Central America or South America.

Also: Latin women.  

Advantage: Espanol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

There's more than one definition of "useful." I hear Spanish every day.  Not so much an Chinese.  Could be Cantonese.  Or Mandarin.  Or Szechuan.  

I get it. I have nothing against Spanish; I wish more schools would offer Mandarin.

Fully agree on your last point - I married one of them there Messican senoritas.

Edited by Kyle
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Languages were taught in high school not so much for the purpose of actually learning that language, but for general education purposes and for the insight it gives a student on the English language.  Which is why Latin was taught (still may be) for so many years.

Spanish, French, and German were added just as a nod to modernity, not because they are more practical than Latin.

Asian languages offer almost no insight whatsoever on the English language.  So it may be more practical, but I'm not sure that was ever the pedagogical point.

Latin for the win!

Took 4 years of Latin in high school. Not only did it help with the SAT, it made learning Spanish pretty damn easy and really helped with picking up conversational Italian. Plus being familiar with Latin root words is the gift that keeps on giving when it comes to understanding new english words.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, F250 said:

You statement implies Spanish isn't useful. Do you even NAFTA/USMCA, bro. Seriously, there is a lot of benefits to speaking Spanish if you do business in Mexico, Central America or South America.

I get it. I may be wrong, but I suspect in 20 years most will be doing more business with China than Latin America, but I could be completely wrong - especially given proximity. I have no issue with any language, like I said earlier I wish more schools offered more options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, F250 said:

Latin for the win!

Took 4 years of Latin in high school. Not only did it help with the SAT, it made learning Spanish pretty damn easy and really helped with picking up conversational Italian. Plus being familiar with Latin root words is the gift that keeps on giving when it comes to understanding new english words.

 

 

Three for me. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tbone_ said:

You haven’t been paying attention to demographics. /no cr

One of us probably needs to take their meter into the shop for a calibration check.

ETA: Everything I know about Asia I learned from watching Japanese porn. What more do we need to understand?

Edited by El Diablo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of these days someone in China is going to flip a switch and all of our shit will just go dark. The good news is they probably won’t do it while they still own so much of our debt.
 

Replace China with Russia and the reason for not flipping the switch is because we’re in their critical infrastructure too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was skeptical when I saw the graphics depicting that absolutely tiny chip...how does it capture internal and network I/O from that one location, how does it decide what to send back to home base,etc. it’d need some decent logic else youre forwarding so much traffic on that people are bound to notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2018 at 1:38 PM, F250 said:

They do. But the denials by Apple and Amazon are pretty specific rather than the usual vague denials. I am not sure who to believe at the moment.

An interesting update on this is Brittain's  GCHQ is backing up the denials being made by Apple and Amazon.

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1MF1DN

DHS also backing the denials by Apple and Amazon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s evident that protecting the big corporations by any means necessary is one of the federal government’s top priorities, probably #2, only slightly less important than protecting itself. Fuck the rule of law. And for sure fuck the people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, XYZ said:

It’s evident that protecting the big corporations by any means necessary is one of the federal government’s top priorities, probably #2, only slightly less important than protecting itself. Fuck the rule of law. And for sure fuck the people.

Or the article is just wrong? That happens you know, not everything you read is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Now, in a letter to Congress, Apple’s vice president of information security George Stathakopoulos sent the company’s strongest denial to date.

“Apple has never found malicious chips, ‘hardware manipulations’ or vulnerabilities purposely planted in any server,” he said. “We never alerted the FBI to any security concerns like those described in the article, nor has the FBI ever contacted us about such an investigation.”

It follows a statement by both the U.K. National Cyber Security Center and U.S. Homeland Security stating that they had “no reason to doubt” statements by Apple, Amazon and Supermicro denying the claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, hornbri said:

Or the article is just wrong? That happens you know, not everything you read is true. 

These articles are wrong a lot of the time. I've been involved in a number of security breaches that made the news and none of them were reported correctly. Usually its a case of the reporter not understanding what they are trying to explain in their article.

This Bloomberg article is a little weird though and the jury is still out on whether the reporter fucked up or was fed misinformation. This story appears to have some IC ties so who knows what to believe at the moment.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...