Jump to content

Русский корабль - иди нахуй


Eastwood

Recommended Posts

From the tweets above, two things are interesting from a strategic POV:

  • China has closed the skies for Boeing and Airbus aircraft of Russian airlines, according to Russian media
  • Iran to supply Russia with car parts, fuel turbines amid gas crisis in Ukraine

Why does China care about Boeing/Airbus aircraft? Is this a part of the sanctions that the EU, etc. are doing?

Why isn't China supply car parts and fuel turbines?  We hear that Belarus is providing military hardware to Russia and now Iran supplying car parts and turbines.  That's some "sisters of the poor" level shit right there.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

From the tweets above, two things are interesting from a strategic POV:

  • China has closed the skies for Boeing and Airbus aircraft of Russian airlines, according to Russian media
  • Iran to supply Russia with car parts, fuel turbines amid gas crisis in Ukraine

Why does China care about Boeing/Airbus aircraft? Is this a part of the sanctions that the EU, etc. are doing?

Why isn't China supply car parts and fuel turbines?  We hear that Belarus is providing military hardware to Russia and now Iran supplying car parts and turbines.  That's some "sisters of the poor" level shit right there.

On the first bit— those Boeings and Airbuses that were leased to Russian airliners have been re-registered to Russia, and lost the airworthiness certificate (presumably reissued by Russian authorities). But China knows full well that those airplanes aren’t getting parts and maintenance at the manufacturer recommended interval. Simply a safety issue, China isn’t going to let them fly in Chinese airspace or land there. I’d expect many nations to follow suit. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ukrainian artillery soldiers of the Allied Forces have mastered the French anti-aircraft guns on the CAESAR wheeled chassis and are effectively destroying the Russian occupiers.

"Everything is fast and clear. Arrived at the position,… 50 sec -" Before the battle ", range - 22110 meters, 4-5 shots per minute, 55 sec" Rebound ", disappeared!" - Press Service of the Allied Forces

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

From the tweets above, two things are interesting from a strategic POV:

  • China has closed the skies for Boeing and Airbus aircraft of Russian airlines, according to Russian media
  • Iran to supply Russia with car parts, fuel turbines amid gas crisis in Ukraine

Why does China care about Boeing/Airbus aircraft? Is this a part of the sanctions that the EU, etc. are doing?

Why isn't China supply car parts and fuel turbines?  We hear that Belarus is providing military hardware to Russia and now Iran supplying car parts and turbines.  That's some "sisters of the poor" level shit right there.

Next Venezuela will take over the oil industry and Cuba will be in charge of food production. Perhaps they can resurrect Mugabe to handle monetary policies. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia deploying their training units into combat with obsolete gear.

If they don't win now, they are going to have trouble training troops in the very near future. Going to see even more recruits rushed straight into battle. 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2022/05/28/to-replenish-its-army-in-ukraine-russia-plans-to-strip-its-training-units-it-can-only-do-this-once/?sh=5a9db363a98f

Quote

Every brigade and regiment in the Russian army forms at least two BTGs for combat, both with professional contract soldiers. A so-called “third battalion” oversees a brigade or regiment’s conscripts—who, by law, aren’t supposed to deploy to a combat zone—and handles training and constabulary tasks.

The mobilization order requires the higher units to strip their third battalions of all legally deployable manpower in order to form an extra BTG. The open-source analysts at Conflict Intelligence Team believe the army can squeeze another 30 or 40 BTGs from the existing third battalions.

These units will not be well-armed. The army has lost a third or more of its active tanks. New construction realistically can’t replace them. Russia’s main tank factory idled back in March as new sanctions deprived it of microchips and optics, which Russia usually imports.

 

Spoiler

To Replenish Its Army In Ukraine, Russia Plans To Strip Its Training Units. It Can Only Do This Once.

David Axe08:00am EDT

Russian troops in January 2022.

Russian defense ministry photo

Before Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered his forces to widen their war on Ukraine starting the night of Feb. 23, the Russian army had 168 battalion tactical groups.

A BTG is the Russian army’s basic unit for ground warfare. Each BTG includes around 800 soldiers plus 50 or so armored vehicles. For the Ukraine campaign, the army concentrated at least 125 of its 168 BTGs—three-quarters of the overall combat force.

Three months later, the Ukrainians have destroyed 4,100 Russian vehicles, killed up to 15,000 Russian troops and wounded perhaps several times that number. Russia’s losses amount to the dissolution of around three-dozen BTGs.

So it’s worth asking: as Russia attempts to sustain a fresh offensive across a small pocket of Ukrainian troops in the city of Severodonetsk, in eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region, how many BTGs are left? And how many more battalions can the Kremlin mobilize?

When the Russian army retreated from northern Ukraine in March and April, it reconstituted some BTGs and also deployed fresh battalions from Russia’s fringes. The Pentagon on May 16 estimated Russia had 106 BTGs in Ukraine. Ten days later the battalion count was up to 110—this despite the Russians losing one or two BTGs trying to cross the Siverskyi Donets River, north of Severodonetsk, in early May.

With 110 BTGs in Ukraine, the Russian army might have just 20 or 30 battalions in reserve. Realistically, some of them cannot deploy without exposing the cities or borders they guard. For example, the remaining BTGs in Kaliningrad, Russia’s geographically-separate exclave on the Baltic Sea.

As casualties continue to mount, not adding forces to Ukraine isn’t an option for Russia unless it’s willing to, well, lose. The solution, of course, is to stand up new BTGs. But with what troops and equipment? 

According to recent mobilization order, which some analysts claim to have seen, the Kremin plans to raid its training base. It’s a risky move.

Every brigade and regiment in the Russian army forms at least two BTGs for combat, both with professional contract soldiers. A so-called “third battalion” oversees a brigade or regiment’s conscripts—who, by law, aren’t supposed to deploy to a combat zone—and handles training and constabulary tasks.

Forbes BusinessRead MoreThe Rise Of Chelsea Women To Be ChartedIn New Documentary Series

The mobilization order requires the higher units to strip their third battalions of all legally deployable manpower in order to form an extra BTG. The open-source analysts at Conflict Intelligence Team believe the army can squeeze another 30 or 40 BTGs from the existing third battalions.

These units will not be well-armed. The army has lost a third or more of its active tanks. New construction realistically can’t replace them. Russia’s main tank factory idled back in March as new sanctions deprived it of microchips and optics, which Russia usually imports.

The Kremlin on paper has 10,000 tanks in storage, including thousands of reasonably modern T-80s and T-72s. But many of those tanks lack chips and optics, too—and others have rusted away after years of exposure to rain and snow. 

Some of the oldest stored tanks have fared the best. Sixty-year-old T-62s don’t have a lot of sophisticated equipment and could be easier to regenerate. This helps to explain why social-media users have begun spotting trainloads of the ancient tanks trundling into Melitopol in Russian-occupied southern Ukraine.

As the wider war in Ukraine enters its fourth month, the Kremlin is beginning the painful process of forming potentially dozens of BTGs to replace an equal number of battalions the Ukrainians have destroyed. The deadline reportedly is in June.

But those BTGs will ride in obsolete vehicles. And they will leave behind them the empty shells of brigades and regiments that no longer will have much, or any, training base. 

Trainers are an army’s regenerative tissue—the means by which it sustains itself after wartime damage. When you deploy the trainers, you lose the ability to regenerate. What that means is: Russia can replenish its army in Ukraine, restoring it roughly to the numerical strength—if not the technological sophistication—it possessed on day one of the wider war. 

But it can only replenish the army once. If Ukraine destroys those extra Russian BTGs, there might not be any more battalions to take their place.

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

So now the Kherson referendum to join Russia is scheduled towards next year.

moving-goalpost.gif

Russia is leaving some strategic flexibility here. It’s hard to walk back from annexing an area into your country.  This is a signal that they don’t know if they can win there and they don’t want to commit unless they are sure they can. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Russia is leaving some strategic flexibility here. It’s hard to walk back from annexing an area into your country.  This is a signal that they don’t know if they can win there and they don’t want to commit unless they are sure they can. 

Agree,  Anything they "annex" cannot be negotiated back or lost in battle without looking bad back home.

When Ukraine starts occupying Kherson, or parts of Crimean and Donbas that have been held since 2014 it will be fun to hear the lamenting from those Russian TV fools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Serbs are just assholes.

 

As it has been, as it always will be.

My wife and I spent two magical weeks in Croatia a few years ago.  This is literally every Croatian within earshot when you even say the word “Serbia”

Super Saiyan Soccer GIF

Edited by Bateshorn
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fighting for the pocket thing mentioned yesterday makes total sense - if you look at the map, that's tying up a helluva lot of Russian troops that can't back each other up easily, are hard to resupply given the distances (of having to go around the pocket), and they are having to defend a much larger area and are spread out more.  Meanwhile, the Ukrainian forces are defending a smaller area and can easily reinforce each other, and are easily to keep supplied.

Ukrainians have already shown plenty of times that they will fall back when they feel like the cost is either not worth it, or that they just can't hold it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

President Volodymyr Zelensky makes a rare trip outside Kyiv - visiting troops on the front line in Kharkiv region

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-61612803

BBC shows Russian ambassador video of Russian atrocities, he says they are a fabrication

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-61623278

Russian ambassador says he doesn't believe Russia will use nukes in Ukraine.  Also said footage of atrocities were computer games or film or jokes.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61618902

Quote

Russia's ambassador to Britain has told the BBC he does not believe his country will use tactical nuclear weapons in the war against Ukraine.

Andrei Kelin said that according to Russian military rules, such weapons are not used in conflicts like this. 

He also described allegations of war crimes in the town of Bucha as "a fabrication".

And he called UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss "very belligerent" and inexperienced.

On the use of nuclear weapons, Mr Kelin said Russia has very strict rules for their use, mainly when the state's existence is threatened.

"It has nothing to do with the current operation," he told BBC One's Sunday Morning.

--

Mr Kelin said the footage was "probably a piece of a film or a piece of a game or a joke or whatever, it's a computer games set".

 

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...