Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Right. Confusing post. $4.9M?
  3. That Reddit AMA announcement looks like Shaggy after Eskimo-dookie took it over.
  4. The local solution, for now, as Seceda's pastoral vibe gets ruined. Not sure this solves anything. Maybe make it only accessible to hikers. https://www.rainews.it/tgr/trento/articoli/2025/07/seceda-tornello-overtourism-pedaggio-dolomiti-7c8b4460-1f46-4e8c-852c-c2f162285e1b.html
  5. The foundational problem is 1) giving a goal-defined task to 2) an entity that literally has no humanity or morality. Without programming in all of the guardrails that are embedded in most human thinking (sociopaths being a notable outlier), there are no limits or boundaries. For example, imagine giving AI the problem of "at present, the world can only grow enough food to feed 7 billion people. There are 7.5 billion people right now, and starvation is rising. What can we do to make our food supply go farther?" You might well get an answer of "euthanize 500 million people." That's a perfectly logical way of dealing with a limited food supply. Sure, it's evil and murderous, but you just asked AI to solve the problem stated....if you fail to give it detailed parameters (like "solve this without killing anyone," simple things like that), or an overarching set of rules, then you WILL end up with results like that. Sometimes unintended, because you just didn't think of the alternatives when you gave it the task. I'm reminded of when I told my 5 yr old son, about to start T-ball, a tip to get him ahead of the game: you can tag the runner to get him out. So, the first game, the first batter hits the ball, and my son charges him, slaps him with his glove, looks at me and yells "DAD! I TAGGED THE RUNNER!" All the other dads look at me. I sheepishly confess "yeah...I forgot to tell him that you have to have the ball when you tag him." Failure to provide underlying/background rules and restrictions leads to bad outcomes. This is Asimov Three Laws of Robotics shit, and we're going to fail at it, miserably.
  6. You might want to take some time and do some research. In short, the producers wanted to truly get their hands in content and make it appealing to a "broader" audience. Chapelle has spoken pretty openly about it and it's worth understanding that it was less of a Dave lost his mind and more Dave wanted to continue his creative endeavors without censorship or heavy handed moderation of his comedy.
  7. Below you'll see three pictures I took around 2014 from Seceda in Ortisei... so calm and peaceful. It was amazing. This was just down the valley from where I learned to ski as a kid. Now? this is the line to ride the cable car up. Dude... this pisses me off to no end. I loathe LOATHE overtourism.
  8. If he says nice things, the idiots will likely give him another extension.
  9. We had an orange Manx once, named Hobbes. Yep, after Calvin and Hobbes fame. He was an asshole, but funny. It's all I got.
  10. With a quick google, I dont see him on any NFL squads after going undrafted. Thats a little surprising unless I am wrong on my search.
  11. Most of the time it was, but it was also driven by fabricating conflicts.
  12. It was one of those digital devices made to look like 9mm pistol. Relationships with criminal attorneys count.
  13. That 320 is a snakebit flop, reminiscent of the Remington R51. Sig should have submitted a full size version of the P365 which would’ve been a better choice. Or an H&K.
  14. There are Texas school zones with signs posted it is unlawful to use your cell phone in them. Anyways, I don't see that as a tack-on charge in the Georgia player's case. If it was against the law, and you got nailed on drug possession, you can bet the officer on the scene isn't going to hold back on charges.
  15. I looked at the menu at Javi's when we were looking for a place the first night and passed. Not a lot of options for my daughter. There is definitely sargassum up and down Norte. It's not out of control and you can swim around it depending on where it settles day to day but it's there. If you go further North towards Mia there's even more.
  16. Just covering all the bases for the relief effort. Check post 151 in the pinned thread and see if anyone has an interest. Floods-how you can help suck it blou!
  17. Check post 151 in the pinned thread and see if anyone has an interest. Floods-how you can help suck it blou!
  18. This is a garbage in::garbage out problem. The LLM's have that tendency because it existed in the training data used to build its probabilistic model of natural language interactions. It feels like it's just scaling up the existing problem with outsourced technical solutions. Yeah, you might get something that works, but it's extremely narrow to just that context. If you try to get it to build something general for multiple problems, you find yourself spending as much time as just developing it yourself. Except you're spending a shitton more in resources to get the same result
  19. Bossman Imma has given his approval to have some "T's" printed for the demented herd. However, he would like a banner/slogan across the back. Of course, he would like something a little snarky/edgy that somewhat may or may not cross the line. Put up a slogan for let the masses decide. I submitted these: Take the loss, pu**y! Palace of Degenerates Our Starfish are Sweet! Prepare Thou Anus! These are, of course, for the flood relief efforts. No profit on this end. We'll send the amount to @Bob Lives!for the match. Here is the front design. Exercise your 5th (not whiskey bottle) amendment rights and speak up! Given enough interest, I guess we could do burnt orange T as well, if the grey doesn't work for you.
  20. He did a one hour hit last season (I believe it was on Mondays) with Jacob Hester and EJ Manuel on SXM, I enjoyed it. He praised aggy for the most part but would throw some passive aggressive shots every now and again.
  21. The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss stipulating the with prejudice portion. Which means, the parties entered into a settlement of the underlying case. The press releases on this matter implicitly give the appearance that the case was dismissed because of a motion to dismiss or otherwise against the plaintiff's wishes. A lot more here than meets the eye.
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...