Jump to content

Candace Owens has balls. Sorry I meant Brigitte Macron has balls.


Recommended Posts

Posted
58 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

He does have that perfect combination of extreme gullibility, unquestioned certainty and self-induced factual ignorance from his limited sources that can be entertaining.

Admiring one of the worst human beings on earth - and maybe the worst Texas politician (until the newest ones arrived) is certainly some kind of statement about something.

As a long dead friend of mine often said "Shit on that bullshit!"

Posted
1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:

He does have that perfect combination of extreme gullibility, unquestioned certainty and self-induced factual ignorance from his limited sources that can be entertaining.

Admiring one of the worst human beings on earth - and maybe the worst Texas politician (until the newest ones arrived) is certainly some kind of statement about something.

He's not gullible. He's a fat fucking moron. Last week he was posting Megyn Kelly. He likes being lied to when it makes him feel good, so he actively seeks it out.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 7/23/2025 at 9:46 PM, F250 said:

He is a junkyard dog, he doesn't growl or bark, he bites.

giphy.gif

 

This is awesome. I need two of these hammer holdsters, with two mini sledge hammers in them. Any Surly member I see, is getting a Thor hammer throw to the dome. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

Her brother died in Vietnam?

Damn, Kids in the Hall actor married well. 

Defected across the DMZ in Korea. One of the reasons Howard stopped mentioning him. 

Posted
On 7/24/2025 at 7:49 AM, TwiceHorn said:

This really may be the solution.  I detest video news online (on TV too for the most part).

Exactly. Take out the pretty faces, the practiced oratory skills, and most of the emotions and dig into to the meat of the news from multiple sources more quickly and efficiently than any video. I also like to dig into forum comments. Here, Reddit, discord, Bluesky (not txags). I focus on the counter arguments to see if they hold merit. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Rigid said:

Exactly. Take out the pretty faces, the practiced oratory skills, and most of the emotions and dig into to the meat of the news from multiple sources more quickly and efficiently than any video. I also like to dig into forum comments. Here, Reddit, discord, Bluesky (not txags). I focus on the counter arguments to see if they hold merit. 

Narrator: They did not hold merit.

Posted
On 7/24/2025 at 7:50 PM, Gil Bang said:

how many times have you been arrested for rape?  

 

I'm 60 fucking years old, and I've never done either of those things.

He does raise kind of an interesting point.  In this particular case, it would seem that there is pretty conclusive evidence that would put the lie to the rumors almost immediately in the form of genetic testing.

But then, how and where do you "raise" that so it reaches the Owens of the world and their audience?  And then, of course, like the birth certificates, the crazies would continue to crazy about the authenticity of the test and its results.

Also a funny thing about the misinformation system of today:  a defamation suit cannot enjoin a party from continuing to defame the plaintiff, the First Amendment won't allow it (prior restraint, dude).

But most rational actors, once they've lost a defamation suit (hell usually once they've been sued), shut the fuck up.  Notable exceptions include Trump, Rudy, Cuntface, and others.  Just  no respect for the truth or anything else.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
49 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

 

But then, how and where do you "raise" that so it reaches the Owens of the world and their audience?  And then, of course, like the birth certificates, the crazies would continue to crazy about the authenticity of the test and its results.

 

This.  Ms. Macron could pee in a cup in front of Candace in a lab while being recorded on a PPV feed.  The urine gets tested right there and results displayed (I'm assuming this is a quasi-instant test) and the crazies would still deny it was accurate/real/legitimate.  

Posted
On 7/24/2025 at 11:33 AM, Js1 said:

Yeah imma say it, this dude is retarded.

im so glad it's 2025 and it's okay to use this word again as it's truly intended!

Posted

Well, to be fair, using regarded instead doesn't really make those of us with intellectually impaired children feel any better.  I would rather people just come right out and be the bigots that they are.

  • Drool 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...