Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

It was based on a Saturday Down South article. And Bama fan speculation on message boards.  
 

People forget Sark was with Bama 2x. He was fired for issues created by his alcoholism by USC in 2015 and left to be with bama in 2016.
 

He was promoted to interim OC at bama for the MNC game. Shortly after the game he went to be the OC for the Falcons. He got fired and went back to Bama to be OC a second time.

The article focused on the friction between him and Saban that led to sark’s departure to the Falcons and Saban not wanting the same mistakes to be repeated. the article went into detail about Nick keeping a close eye on Sark and many believed the reason why was to keep Sark sober.
 

Then after saying he wasn’t leaving he ditched bama to be the HC of the Longhorns. Guy doesn’t take breaks at all. Damn. The people on the bama forum mentioned stretches of absences by Sark during both stints at Bama. Most believed because of his prior struggles at other places that the absences were due to more of the same. 
 

it’s like you guys didn’t read shit about sark after we hired him. None of this is new news. Surly didn’t break jack shit. If you are ignorant about his previous struggles everywhere else he’s been you are in the minority. Most people already knew all this shit. Surly is like the last to actually discuss it. Period, it’s been discussed a lot everywhere else, by a lot of people. We aren’t breaking anything new. Period. None of this information was hidden from you. It’s been out there in plain sight for years. 

 

That’s a lot of words to describe speculation. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hank_Hill said:

That’s a lot of words to describe speculation. 

I was trying to give context. My bad.
 

Some of you require proof and multiple sources to accept 2 + 2 = 4 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

It was based on a Saturday Down South article. And Bama fan speculation on message boards.  
 

People forget Sark was with Bama 2x. He was fired for issues created by his alcoholism by USC in 2015 and left to be with bama in 2016.
 

He was promoted to interim OC at bama for the MNC game. Shortly after the game he went to be the OC for the Falcons. He got fired and went back to Bama to be OC a second time.

The article focused on the friction between him and Saban that led to sark’s departure to the Falcons and Saban not wanting the same mistakes to be repeated. the article went into detail about Nick keeping a close eye on Sark and many believed the reason why was to keep Sark sober.
 

Then after saying he wasn’t leaving he ditched bama to be the HC of the Longhorns. Guy doesn’t take breaks at all. Damn. The people on the bama forum mentioned stretches of absences by Sark during both stints at Bama. Most believed because of his prior struggles at other places that the absences were due to more of the same. 
 

it’s like you guys didn’t read shit about sark after we hired him. None of this is new news. Surly didn’t break jack shit. If you are ignorant about his previous struggles everywhere else he’s been you are in the minority. Most people already knew all this shit. Surly is like the last to actually discuss it. Period, it’s been discussed a lot everywhere else, by a lot of people. We aren’t breaking anything new. Period. None of this information was hidden from you. It’s been out there in plain sight for years. 

She’s not leaving sark for you. ❤️ 

I’m far beyond a 4.3

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Rimbo said:

the on-field product should be all the proof you need

Call me crazy but there’s a few reasons we could suck shit at football this year before getting to Sarks wife having sex with players.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Skipper said:

Talk about it sure.   We did that Saturday during the initial shock of the report.  It's now Tuesday and this thread is 40 pages long and has gone full fucking teenage girl Longhorn TMZ.   It's pretty pathetic.

first time GIF

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TejasPedro said:

Can we start a list of all the things that are hard?

Winning.

Not pissing away a fortune with poor decisions.

Sobriety 

Pulling out…..

Why not? Hopefully we beat Vandy and Georgia and win out and this thread is nuked. Otherwise, it will become too scary a place for me to post in.
 

Because if sark fails or leaves his apostles will blame me and this thread for it. Because it’s hard to blame your idol for anything. I am a convenient target. 
 

my friend who told me personal shit about Sark and L’Oreal knew L’Oreal well before L’Oreal was an assistant track coach at USC during the same timeframe as Sark’s failed tenure as HC there. My friend told me they advised L’Oreal “not to go after that married man.” To no avail. My friend is sick of L’Oréal’s bullshit. So when certain things happened last year and again this year, my friend told me a lot of what they knew about the personal bullshit and fuckery that was going on that, again, I honestly I don’t care about.
 

I sat on this for months and months until Sark got our team swamped by a shitass now Fired Billy Napier led  team after a bye week. And I made a mean post in the game thread. And give zero fucks. 

So yeah, I’m piling on. Don’t care. Sark needs to clean up his own shit and own it. I just haven’t seen much in his past history he’s taken much downtime to own any of his own mess. Unless by downtime, it was the 3 weeks he spent relearning to walk and talk after open heart surgery to successfully correct a congenital heart defect in 2020 and his returning back to Bama. Respect for that. Much respect.  
 

I just don’t like women who chase married men. And cause a ton of bullshit drama. No matter how beautiful or talented L’Oreal may be. When I see her twirling on the sideline like it’s a catwalk it pisses me off. Particularly with all the offseason drama she has purportedly caused. She can Go sit her ass in the stands. Like all the other wives. Hopefully UNC will ban that stupid idiot influencer hoe Jordan from the sidelines as well now that their documentary is dead. I would love to see a video of her being denied entry to the field. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, SarkAfterDark said:

Nicole’s made up information from “sources” are just her own conjecture from reading articles and message board post. 

If you happen to know things that you're not allowed to share, but want others to get the hint, then you might decide to redirect people to certain things others are saying, so that you can say the things without saying the things.

What you're saying here is wishful thinking, nothing more.

Head Sand GIF by Profit Accumulator

  • Haha 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, mwaadeeb said:

You mean the rumor that he denied? Until there's something / anything on the record, it may be true, it may not be, it's gossip. 

Did he though? His AGENT did, but I didn’t hear Sark deny it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Ghost of Shag said:

Your obtuse naïveté doesn’t detract from the reality that this team sucks ass.

6-2 with a win over our #1 rival. Yeah, we might as well shut down the program   
 

Dumbass. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, lilMAC25 said:

Did he though? His AGENT did, but I didn’t hear Sark deny it.

The thing is all coaches do lie and omit whether it’s in a presser and they are asked a question or if they are interviewing or interested in another job they will lie. They usually don’t throw players or other staff under the bus.  They omit things. They phrase things a certain way to keep the team together. It’s what they do. Sark said he wasn’t leaving Bama and then left Bama for Texas. We may never truly get all the answers there. Unless he leaves. And y’all will blame this thread and me. Which is the definition of stupidity. If he truly had Sexass put out feelers in September for an NFL head coaching gig it has fuck all to do with anything posted by anyone on surly. And y’all are the true cucks for stanning for him if he sees this as merely a job to get to his pinnacle job in the NFL. If that’s really true. I heard that stuff but I thought it was in relation to his NFL approach to the offseason and figured that’s where it came from. 

Edited by Nicole44
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

Because if sark fails or leaves his apostles will blame me and this thread for it. Because it’s hard to blame your idol for anything. I am a convenient target. 

Hate to break it to you, but you aren’t that important. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Haha 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, lilMAC25 said:

Did he though? His AGENT did, but I didn’t hear Sark deny it.

He angrily denied it in the post game presser, I thought.

Posted

I must be the only one here that saw a 9-3 or 8-4 record. We are a very young team and I just accepted we were just gonna get better each game and be a really good team at the end. Arch and the oline will be much better next year and we’ll  get better each snap with experience.  Lil did I know it was sark that was sabotaging the season and coaching us to fail cause he hates Texas winning - go figure. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

The Rimbo and Nicole buddy comedy to take down Sark we didn’t know we needed

Poor Sark, soon to be found drowned in Town Lake 

  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

Sark said he wasn’t leaving Bama and then left Bama for Texas. We may never truly get all the answers there. Unless he leaves. And y’all will blame this thread and me.

Jesus Christ, how big is your ego?  Do you seriously think Sark would leave Texas because @Nicole44 was critical of him on a message board?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 5
Posted
3 minutes ago, Js1 said:

The Rimbo and Nicole buddy comedy to take down Sark we didn’t know we needed

Poor Sark, soon to be found drowned in Town Lake 

don't forget CTJ in here too

  • Haha 3
Posted
Just now, jimmyjazz said:

Jesus Christ, how big is your ego?  Do you seriously think Sark would leave Texas because @Nicole44 was critical of him on a message board?

No, she thinks that if Sark leaves, she'll get blamed for it by Surly because of all the incels here who can't get laid and blame women for everything. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

No, she thinks that if Sark leaves, she'll get blamed for it by Surly because of all the incels here who can't get laid and blame women for everything. 

I blame men for everything, so she’s safe 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, mwaadeeb said:

He angrily denied it in the post game presser, I thought.

He was angry with the lady who reported it, but he didn’t really deny the truth of the report.

 

 

Posted

Nicole claims to have insider information but just conveniently can't speak about any of it and also just rehashes what others have already thrown out there as true.  "oh yes, my source is saying the same thing".  

Posted
10 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

No, she thinks that if Sark leaves, she'll get blamed for it by Surly because of all the incels here who can't get laid and blame women for everything. 

Like blaming Sarks wife? Huh!

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, gurt said:

Nicole claims to have insider information but just conveniently can't speak about any of it and also just rehashes what others have already thrown out there as true.  "oh yes, my source is saying the same thing".  

the only two that have said anything remotely resembling inside information are nicole and ctj. everyone else is restating what they've said or trying to flog her with whips and shit.

Posted
1 minute ago, scramblyn said:

the only two that have said anything remotely resembling inside information are nicole and ctj. everyone else is restating what they've said or trying to flog her with whips and shit.

what has she said that ctj didn't say?  

Posted
15 minutes ago, mwaadeeb said:

He angrily denied it in the post game presser, I thought.

Here’s a transcript from the presser. Sark said the report was ridiculous and was mad it was reported as factual. But Sark never directly addressed the question by saying he wasn’t interested in the NFL, only Sark’s agent said that in a posted statement. 

Q: Do you have interest in the NFL? Do you want to address that? 

Sark: I’d love to touch on this, so bear with me for a second because it really pisses me off that one person can make a report that, in turn, the entire media sports world runs with as factual.

To the point of my agency and my agents have to put a statement out that they never have done historically. CAA, Jimmy Sexton and Ed Manowitz have never done that.

But I had to do that to protect my locker room and my team. And I thought it was absolutely ridiculous, I thought it was completely unprofessional of that person to put that report out. And the fact that everybody ran with it, is borderline embarrassing for the media. And I respect what you guys do, I really do, and everybody else. But the fact that everybody ran that as truth, is really embarrassing, okay.

So I’ve got a small circle when I make decisions on what I do and what I don’t do. And nobody would speak on my behalf without me knowing. So where that report came from, I’d love to talk to that person because it’s absolutely ridiculous.”

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, gurt said:

Nicole claims to have insider information but just conveniently can't speak about any of it and also just rehashes what others have already thrown out there as true.  "oh yes, my source is saying the same thing".  

So the smart thing to do is trot my friend out here to be destroyed by a bunch of people who can’t accept Sark is 💯 the reason why our offseason sucked and his entire side of the ball sucks? Sounds like a plan. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, gurt said:

what has she said that ctj didn't say?  

she's been saying some of it before him.  she's saying more too. ctj alluded to golden and he missed 30 days. she seems to have a lot more detail about sark and his bullshit.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nicole44 said:

So the smart thing to do is trot my friend out here to be destroyed by a bunch of people who can’t accept Sark is 💯 the reason why our offseason sucked and his entire side of the ball sucks? Sounds like a plan. 

I'm not absolving Sark of any of the blame, I just think you are claiming to have insider info in order to gain attention on the internet.

Posted
Just now, gurt said:

I'm not absolving Sark of any of the blame, I just think you are claiming to have insider info in order to gain attention on the internet.

You really think someone would do that? Just go on the internet and tell lies for attention? /s

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I had to watch that clip again. 

So Russini is basically saying Sark and his agency had every right to be upset at her reporting and the timing of it, and that "unfortunately they never added that Steve Sarkisian wants to stay at Texas, right?" Then she confirmed her source was neither Sark or Sexton. 

It's like she's admitting to stirring the pot. Really weird. 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I had to watch that clip again. 

So Russini is basically saying Sark and his agency had every right to be upset at her reporting and the timing of it, and that "unfortunately they never added that Steve Sarkisian wants to stay at Texas, right?" Then she confirmed her source was neither Sark or Sexton. 

It's like she's admitting to stirring the pot. Really weird. 

 

women, amirite?

rodney_dangerfield_2390.jpg

  • Haha 2
Posted
28 minutes ago, Texas Wahoo said:

 

 

Can we just shut this thread down now? She is clearly just throwing shit against the wall and hoping it sticks. This entire story is complete bullshit. 

There is no world where Sark kneecaps himself and the program with a public wish/plea to go to the NFL. Get the fuck out of here. 

Shut this motherfucker down.

Posted

All this fan (villain?) fiction reads like the Big Cigar updates on Barking Carnival long time ago. People were eating it up until it proved to be mere storytelling loosely based on fanciful personal proclivities and navel gazing. 

  • Drool 1
Posted
Just now, Hank Kingsley said:

I had to watch that clip again. 

So Russini is basically saying Sark and his agency had every right to be upset at her reporting and the timing of it, and that "unfortunately they never added that Steve Sarkisian wants to stay at Texas, right?" Then she confirmed her source was neither Sark or Sexton. 

It's like she's admitting to stirring the pot. Really weird. 

 

Her source(s) were from the NFL and she wouldn't be doing her job if she didn't run with it. In fact, she'd be a complete idiot not to run with that considering the Texas brand and it's reach. 

Sark and Sexton have a right to be upset, but they need to be upset with the NFL people who leaked it to her. Her point was "hey I didn't get this from you - I got this from the people who were talking to you. take it up with them!"

  • Hook 'Em 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...