Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Stop recruiting upper middle class white guys unless they demonstrate incredible physicality. Who is the last guy from this demographic that was physical and hungry?

Defensive gangster in chief, Michael Taaffe. 
He wasn’t originally recruited though. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Alien Octopus said:

Shipley needed to wash off the stink of those two misses. Sark building the team.

Fine with it, just saying the game was essentially over at that point. 

Posted
3 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

top recruiting upper middle class white guys unless they demonstrate incredible physicality. Who is the last guy from this demographic that was physical and hungry?

Hmmm... 

Oct 11, 2025; Dallas, Texas, USA; Texas Longhorns defensive back Michael Taaffe (16) celebrates with the golden hat after the Longhorns defeat the Oklahoma Sooners at the Cotton Bowl. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Thatguy said:

Ewers put the ball on the money. Rarely did guys have to twist, turn, or even break stride on everything intermediate on down.

statistically and anecdotally this is not true.

statistically: QE was accurate on ~65% of his on platform intermediate throws, which is fine, but is not the drew brees-esque “always puts it on the money” type accuracy you describe. and again, this is on platform. knowing how often he threw the ball off platform would suggest that his overall number is significantly lower.

anecdotally: ewers had xavier worthy, ad mitchell, matthew golden, isaiah bond, jt sanders, gunnar helm, and jordan whittington to throw the ball to, behind a a great o line at that. Texas doesn’t mightily struggle to get first downs (forget scoring points) against the likes of a&m, kentucky, vanderbilt, arizona state, etc if ewers was really out there just putting the ball on the money all day to his bevy of nfl wr’s, many of whom thrived in the intermediate area of the field.

IMG_4129.thumb.webp.144a211c7f65785f23c52600ffced1c3.webp

61% and 69% catchable balls is not “always on the money”. especially for a 22 year old third year starter.

Edited by Derka
Posted
18 hours ago, wood said:

Yep. The number of 15-25 yard throws vs Florida was just stupid, esp on like 2nd & 5, etc. Some of us have been wondering all season where the short passing was, and saying it should have been used from the get-go to get Arch some confidence and rhythm. Yesterday was the most relaxed and confident we've seen Arch this year. Hard to believe it took 6 games ...

Well I still feel like people are ignoring that Arch was flat out missing the easy throws to start this year. Even in this game some of those side arm throws were behind/low and instead of getting them the ball in stride they had to stop or slide and catch.

Not a gripe, because he's obviously improving and completing them.

But to ignore that those "quick easy throws" were there and he was missing them is ridiculous.  I do truly believe he's turning a corner...but has a little ways to go.

14 hours ago, dcar00 said:

this and the game started to slow down for Arch when our running game became passable instead of horrible.

Exactly.  Don't put it all on him, and he feeds off momentum.

6 hours ago, Thatguy said:

That's what pissed me off the most. Ewers put the ball on the money. Rarely did guys have to twist, turn, or even break stride on everything intermediate on down. He was so quick to pop a ball out to his check down that he had people here thinking "that was the play call". Sure the freaks like Jeremiah Smith are going in the first round no matter what, but when you are getting all your pass catchers to the league it means your quarterback is playing well too. Matthew Golden doesn't go in the 1st round if he stays in Houston. We took Ewers for granted. Hopefully one day he is appreciated for his time here. Back to back CFP and 2 and 1 vs OU is nothing to sneeze at, and was 1 minute away from Pete the Great status. 

Agreed. I do NOT get the hate for a guy who may not have been as talented as it was claimed he was, doing everything he could to get them where they got.

2 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

He navigates the pocket well and we’ve said it from the beginning. He still needs to work on getting the ball out quickly which he did this week vs Oklahoma. If he can continue to do what he did vs Oklahoma coupled with his deep ball clip rate which is really good it truly opens up the whole field. But if he goes back to holding the ball and looking for deep shots only it’s not a good recipe for our team success 

Yeah we saw that against Miss St last year in the first half, then he started checking down until it opened up. Thought he learned from that game, but maybe it's taking him longer.

2 hours ago, Huckleberry said:

I mean we missed a touchdown on Saturday because he didn't get rid of the ball on time. He does genuinely need to improve how quickly he gets the ball out on quick hitters, anyone arguing that has no idea what they're looking at. 

But he is improving. 

Exactly. It's not the "release time" as much as him confidently reading the field and throwing the ball without seeing the guy open yet.  He's getting there, and improving.

1 hour ago, chainsaw said:

If you swapped Arch for Quinn Ewers in Gainesville, it wouldn't have been 29-21 Gators it would have been 42-0. Arch has so much more poise and ability to navigate the pocket.

This is a really fucking stupid take. Quinn wasn't great, but the disrespect is obscene.

1 hour ago, Codaxx said:

I dont think the results would have been much different. Lot more sacks and a few more completions. I do not think the gameplan would have been the same though. 

Pretty much. They may still lose, and Quinn would have been sacked a lot more. But the offense would have probably moved a little better when he had time.

1 hour ago, Hank Kingsley said:

With the way the O-line played, no chance Quinn even finishes the Florida game. 

 

This is probably accurate too.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I don't have numbers to back it up but my eyes tell me Ewers was much better than Arch in putting short to intermediate throws on target in such a manner that those receivers, however great they were, didn't have to contort themselves to make the catch.  I mean, we all watch the games, if I'm seeing something I'm not, let me know.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

I don't have numbers to back it up but my eyes tell me Ewers was much better than Arch in putting short to intermediate throws on target in such a manner that those receivers, however great they were, didn't have to contort themselves to make the catch.  I mean, we all watch the games, if I'm seeing something I'm not, let me know.

I think in the short game, 1st read Ewers was elite. His throws in the screen game were great. Ewers was not great in the intermediate last year at all. Arch was struggling in the intermediate, but that has gotten better so we shall see. 

Edited by Codaxx
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

I think in the short game, 1st read Ewers was elite. His throws in the screen game were great. Ewers was not great in the intermediate last year at all. Arch was struggling in the intermediate, but that has gotten better so we shall see. 

Yeah, I was trying to figure out how to say "less than intermediate" but that sounded stupid so I just said "short to intermediate".  We're on the same page.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, dcar00 said:

LOL no.  Ewers would probably see the field and D much differently.  he might even audible out of bad plays or change routes.  It was a horribly called game by Sark though.

ewers, who constantly ran for his life when he wasn’t even under any pressure, and who was one of the worst qbs in his draft class when under pressure, would have been completely overwhelmed by florida’s pass rush that day. he probably turns the ball over a few times before getting mauled and injured by florida’s d line.

to quote huckleberry from a bit earlier in this thread, anyone who doesn’t understand that has no idea what they are watching. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I don't have numbers to back it up but my eyes tell me Ewers was much better than Arch in putting short to intermediate throws on target in such a manner that those receivers, however great they were, didn't have to contort themselves to make the catch.  I mean, we all watch the games, if I'm seeing something I'm not, let me know.

nah I think you're spot on...we can only hope Arch gets the short passing game on that level this year.

Posted
3 hours ago, Huckleberry said:

I mean we missed a touchdown on Saturday because he didn't get rid of the ball on time. He does genuinely need to improve how quickly he gets the ball out on quick hitters, anyone arguing that has no idea what they're looking at. 

But he is improving. 

100% right, Livingstone was wide fucking open for an easy throw. It was his 1st read and still didn't trust the play or process.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Derka said:

statistically and anecdotally this is not true.

statistically: QE was accurate on ~65% of his on platform intermediate throws, which is fine, but is not the drew brees-esque “always puts it on the money” type accuracy you describe. and again, this is on platform. knowing how often he threw the ball off platform would suggest that his overall number is significantly lower.

anecdotally: ewers had xavier worthy, ad mitchell, matthew golden, isaiah bond, jt sanders, gunnar helm, and jordan whittington to throw the ball to, behind a a great o line at that. Texas doesn’t mightily struggle to get first downs (forget scoring points) against the likes of a&m, kentucky, vanderbilt, arizona state, etc if ewers was really out there just putting the ball on the money all day to his bevy of nfl wr’s, many of whom thrived in the intermediate area of the field.

Stats say whatever you want them to say Derka. For example the stats say that Ewers was mid on intermediate routes. Then you watch a game and see him intentionally throw two balls out the back of the end zone and then another two into the stands to avoid a sack and there goes his percentage, right? Truth is if you watch him he wasn't missing a bunch of intermediate throws. The stats count those throwaways just the same. The stats also dont take into account what you are being asked to do, meaning not all intermediate throws are the same. A receiver driving 15 yards down field and sitting down is not the same as a 15-20 yard dig. That dig is a big boy throw, but it counts the same in the stat book. Sarkisians offense requires big boy quarterbacking as his routes are almost always on the move. 

We haven't had a great O-line. We couldn't run the ball vs talented fronts, Cam Williams was a turnstile, and we had left guard problems even then. What a lot of people dont understand is the issues are largely systemic. We've consistently asked people to do things they cannot do. Like we run this play every game and its stupid. We run a play action pass where the line blocks just like its split zone. In case you didnt know split zone is inside zone but where the TE comes from the Hback spot all the way across the formation to block the backside DE. Probably a 1/3 of Ewers sacks came from that dumb ass blocking scheme. Slow devloping ply asking a guy to do something he cannot. We had one great lineman. Guys like Cam Williams got drafted on measurables. If he was good he goes in the first round. Everyone else was adequate to bad. Ewers just learned to get the ball out quickly. 

Again, we had one freakish receiver and a bunch of other solid ones. Like I said, if your receivers are going to the league it means the QB is playing well. Quit making it like Ewers didnt help get them where they were. He had a huge hand in that. Have some respect. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, HtownHorn said:

100% right, Livingstone was wide fucking open for an easy throw. It was his 1st read and still didn't trust the play or process.

I think that is bit tougher than people think. He is running under center and turning his back. He needs to throw that with touch, because 22 in under the route. There is room there to do it. He just cannot throw it on a line. It is a missed opportunity, but I would rather he forego it than completely miss the defender under the receiver and turn it into a turnover. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Vertigo said:

Michael Taaffe - Current all american safety and team captain? Ethan Burke - Current starting SDE and stuffer of aggies on the goal line? Arch Manning - current starting QB who gets hyped by being punched in the face? Parker Livinstone - Current leading receiver and guest of honor at the closetojumping 40 yard dash competition?   

The dudes that come out on fire against our rivals and pump up their team mates? Man, fuck those guys..

Posted
14 minutes ago, HtownHorn said:

100% right, Livingstone was wide fucking open for an easy throw. It was his 1st read and still didn't trust the play or process.

Livingstone spoke about this - he screwed up his route on that play.  Parkler said he was supposed to sell the outside hard and then cut back in but he was so open he got excited and ran right to his spot.  He was early (but open) but Arch wasn't looking at him just yet.  When he did finally look over there it was too late.

Next season I'd expect Arch to recognize the defense screwed up and ad-lib the early throw.  I just think things are still moving fast and he is trying to play each play like its coached.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
15 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Stats say whatever you want them to say Derka.

no, the stats say how quinn ewers performed throwing intermediate passes last year. 

the rejection of stats, facts, and hard data continues to plague the people of this country.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Im shocked Derka has shown up here in the Arch Manning thread with a multi-paragraph post shitting on Quinn Ewers. 

yes, it was me who brought up quinn ewers in this thread, and not the guy i’m replying to. 🙄 why don’t you go make some whiny posts about ThatGuy constantly inserting QE into this thread for no reason instead of making whiny posts about me responding to him you big baby.

also, you describing me posting literal quinn ewers stats and actually calling them good but not great as “shitting on quinn ewers” shows the pathetic fanboi nature of the QE cult. grow up.

Edited by Derka
Posted

can we stop bringing up Quinn in this thread? That goes to more than Derka. Not sure why anyone felt this was an appropriate time to delve into this again. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

can we stop bringing up Quinn in this thread? That goes to more than Derka. Not sure why anyone felt this was an appropriate time to delve into this again. 

i mean it’s pretty simple: one guy keeps bringing him into this thread. you want QE to stop being brought up, you’re gonna have to ask the one guy who won’t stop inserting him into this thread to go ahead and (dramatic pause)…stop inserting him into this thread.

and @SydneyCarton whining about me responding to him is absolute chickenshit. take it up with the guy who keeps making this thread about how awesome quinn ewers was. don’t bitch at me for responding because you’re all in your little fee fees that someone didn’t blindly slurp quinn ewers.

Edited by Derka
Posted
2 minutes ago, Derka said:

yes, it was me who brought up quinn ewers in this thread, and not the guy i’m replying to. why don’t you make some whiny post about him constantly inserting  QE into this thread instead of making some whiny post about me responding to him.

also, you describing me posting quinn ewers stats and actually calling them good but not great as “shitting on quinn ewers” shows the pathetic fanboi nature of the QE cult. be a bigger fucking baby about it, christ.

It doesn't matter if it was you who brought it up or not. Most people can take a couple one line shots or posts, and move. You, however, can be banked upon to show up like an opportune badger who will beat the fucking subject into the ground until that dead horse is halfway to china, a bloody pulpy mess. When the subject of Ewers comes on, on any thread, you can be counted on to appear like a malevolent genie who's going to ruin the thread. 

No one wants a 5 page dissection of Quinn Ewers on an Arch Manning thread. It's not being a baby, it's a statement of fact. If other people don't get the same treatment as poor Derka, maybe, just maybe, it's because your track record and reputation precede you. But yes, you're not the one being a baby here. "But, but, HE GETS TO MAKE A QE COMMENT!!" 

I'm no cultist. I just don't want to read about that shit here. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Derka said:

i mean it’s pretty simple: one guy keeps bringing him into this thread. you want QE to stop being brought up, you’re gonna have to ask the one guy who won’t stop bringing him up to go ahead and stop inserting him into this thread.

and @SydneyCarton whining about me responding to him is absolute chickenshit. you should be better than that. 

i did not say you are the lone offender. I got sucked into also. Plenty of fault to go around. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

Livingstone spoke about this - he screwed up his route on that play.  Parkler said he was supposed to sell the outside hard and then cut back in but he was so open he got excited and ran right to his spot.  He was early (but open) but Arch wasn't looking at him just yet.  When he did finally look over there it was too late.

Next season I'd expect Arch to recognize the defense screwed up and ad-lib the early throw.  I just think things are still moving fast and he is trying to play each play like its coached.

Certainly does put some great context on the play. Two young guys learning together. They hooked up later on 3rd down which basically ended the game as Texas got the FG and a TD lead and that was enough for the defense.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Im shocked Derka has shown up here in the Arch Manning thread with a multi-paragraph post shitting on Quinn Ewers. 

It would just be easier to give him his own forum and let him opine as much as he wants on all topics and not liter the rest of the threads on other boards with his wild rantings.

Edited by HtownHorn
Posted
2 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

You, however, can be banked upon to show up like an opportune badger who will beat the fucking subject into the ground until that dead horse is halfway to china, a bloody pulpy mess.

yeah see this is complete horseshit. it’s not even remotely true. i may have responded to one out of every five posts that ThatGuy has made about quinn ewers over this weekend. you’re completely full of shit, and now you’re in here derailing the thread even more, with way more words and paragraphs than i’ve ever used on this subject.

you are a hypersensitive moron who is actively doing the very thing you’re whining about. fucking grow up.

Posted
Just now, HtownHorn said:

It would just be easier to give him his own forum and let him opine as much as he wants on all topics and not liter the rest of the threads on other boards with his wild rantings.

i literally posted quinn ewers stats. but according to you that’s“wild rantings.”

the mythology you guys create about me is weird, obsessive, but most of all, completely delusional and off base. you just make shit up out of thin air and post it like it’s true. you whine about shit that doesn’t even exist. it’s sad.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Derka said:

no, the stats say how quinn ewers performed throwing intermediate passes last year. 

the rejection of stats, facts, and hard data continues to plague the people of this country.

Black people are 53% of all US murder arrests is a stat. But another stat is black people are 7.5 times more likely to be falsely accused, as well as black people constitute 55% of the exonerations. A person could shout the first stat from the mountain top while ignoring the other two that tell another part of the story. That is what you are doing here, Derka, and its disingenuous. 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

i did not say you are the lone offender. I got sucked into also. Plenty of fault to go around. 

oh i’m aware. but try telling that to the gaggle of derka stans who are currently making this all about me. all i’ve done in this thread is respond to other people’s posts.

@Thatguy made it about quinn, and i responded to his posts.

@SydneyCarton made it about me, and again, i’ve responded.

don’t turn around and blame any of this shit on me when all i’m doing is responding to other people’s posts. i did not introduce quinn ewers into this thread, and i certainly am not the one currently ranting like an unhinged child @SydneyCarton because someone else posted stats about my precious former qb that didnt paint him as a football throwing demigod. 😢 

y’all are adults. stop whining and own your shit.

Edited by Derka
Posted
1 minute ago, Thatguy said:

Black people are 53% of all US murder arrests is a stat.

yes, this is a totally germane point and a completely earnest way to begin a discussion about quarterbacking stats. 🙄 

Posted
1 minute ago, Derka said:

oh i’m aware. but try telling that to the gaggle of derka stans who are currently making this all about me. all i’ve done in this thread is respond to other people’s posts.

@Thatguy made it about quinn

@SydneyCarton made it about me

don’t turn around and blame any of this shit on me when all i’m doing is responding to other people’s posts. i did not introduce quinn ewers into this thread, and i certainly am not the one currently renting like an unhinged child @SydneyCarton because someone else posted stats that i didn’t like.

y’all are adults. stop whining and own your shit.

Lol. Here we go...

Posted
1 hour ago, Derka said:

statistically and anecdotally this is not true.

statistically: QE was accurate on ~65% of his on platform intermediate throws, which is fine, but is not the drew brees-esque “always puts it on the money” type accuracy you describe. and again, this is on platform. knowing how often he threw the ball off platform would suggest that his overall number is significantly lower.

anecdotally: ewers had xavier worthy, ad mitchell, matthew golden, isaiah bond, jt sanders, gunnar helm, and jordan whittington to throw the ball to, behind a a great o line at that. Texas doesn’t mightily struggle to get first downs (forget scoring points) against the likes of a&m, kentucky, vanderbilt, arizona state, etc if ewers was really out there just putting the ball on the money all day to his bevy of nfl wr’s, many of whom thrived in the intermediate area of the field.

IMG_4129.thumb.webp.144a211c7f65785f23c52600ffced1c3.webp

61% and 69% catchable balls is not “always on the money”. especially for a 22 year old third year starter.

Do you just lurk around waiting to hop into any Quinn Ewers related topic?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

Yes. I'm the one ranting like an unhinged child. 

Total SydneyCarton posts on page 140: 3 (including this one). 

Total Derka posts on page 140: 9 (so far). 

It's just statistics Derka, stats don't lie, right?


 

Edited by SydneyCarton
Posted
4 minutes ago, Derka said:

yes, this is a totally germane point and a completely earnest way to begin a discussion about quarterbacking stats. 🙄 

Of course you cut off the rest of my comment. Again disingenuous. 

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

I'm no cultist. I just don't want to read about that shit here. 

this is a lie. if this were true you’d be incessantly bitching at ThatGuy for constantly inserting QE into this thread. but that’s never happened. you only got mad when i replied to one of his countless posts about quinn because my response didn’t slurp quinn. (and lets be clear- i did not even approach “shitting on” quinn- i posted his stats and i literally said that he was good, you giant fucking baby). and then you yourself even admitted that you got mad because it was me, specifically, who said it. you’re not mad about QE being discussed, you’re mad that after him being discussed ad nauseam that i chimed in to say something that wasn’t blindly slurping him. own that shit you coward.

and yes, you absolutely have been ranting like an unhinged child (or did i just imagine post #6973?) over this molehill which you’ve successfully turned into a giant mountain of wet dog shit. pat yourself on the back sydney, you’ve truly been a bastion of calm and reason throughout this very important discussion. 🙄 

“i don’t want this thread to be about quinn ewers, so i’m going to go nuts and make it all about derka.” that’s fucking brilliant. 

im not discussing this retarded tangent any further, but feel free to keep ironically ranting and raving about how this thread should just be about the thread subject as you do everything in your power to make sure that doesn’t happen. 👌🏼 

Edited by Derka
Posted
2 minutes ago, Derka said:

this is a lie. if this were true you’d be incessantly bitching at ThatGuy for constantly inserting QE into this thread. but that’s never happened. you only got mad when i replied to one of his countless posts about quinn because my response didn’t slurp quinn. and then you yourself even admitted that you got mad because it was me, specifically, who said it. you’re not mad about QE being discussed, you’re mad that after him being discussed ad nauseam that i chimed in to say something that wasn’t blindly slurping him. own that shit you coward.

and yes, you absolutely have been ranting like an unhinged child (or did i just imagine post #6793?) over this molehill which you’ve successfully turned into a giant mountain of wet dog shit. pat yourself on the back sydney, you’ve truly been a bastion of calm and reason throughout this very important discussion. 🙄 

“i don’t want this thread to be about quinn ewers, so i’m going to go nuts and make it all about derka.” what a child you are.

im not discussing this retarded tangent any further, but feel free to keep ironically ranting and raving about how this thread should just be about the thread subject as you do everything in your power to make sure that doesn’t happen. 👌🏼 

Actually, I said that you get my attention because you will show up and post incessantly and unrelentingly on the topic and ruin the thread, while accusing everyone else of that which you're guilty of doing. See my post above on post count. There's a different at getting mad because it's you, and being irritated for knowing what your presence portends. And lo and behold.

1 post is a rant to you? I'd argue that post was prophetic, more than a rant. But yes, once again absolve yourself of any wrongoing. 

Congrats, derka. It's been two decades, of which I've been mostly sympathetic to your situation, but you're going on ignore. I'm too old to waste my time with this shit. 

Posted
1 hour ago, dcar00 said:

LOL no.  Ewers would probably see the field and D much differently.  he might even audible out of bad plays or change routes.  It was a horribly called game by Sark though.

Sark's play calling relies too much on out smarting the other team. That worked against Michigan last year, but not against Georgia and OSU. Sark was downright bad against Florida, which is not a situation Ewers thrived in. As we saw against OU, sometimes you just need guys to say fuck it, I'm getting a first down here no matter what the defense does. That was mostly Wisner, but Texas needs more of that across the board on offense. Arch can't execute plays as designed the way Ewers could, but he's more comfortable in "fuck it" mode.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Its really interesting to me seeing so many of our fans and national talking heads talking about how this was a turning point for Arch. 

While I don't totally disagree, I think I'd label it differently. To me, the turning point was against Florida where he seemed to take on a different level of effort and leadership. That was about the toughest situation you could put a QB in, and he fought hard on every snap all the way to the end. He had better body language and made a couple of plays that gave you a glimpse of a player with something extra. I am sure his team saw this during the film rewatch. 

This OU game felt like the rest of the team knew they had a QB who leads from the front. Arch got punished against UF and kept asking for more. He has a really long way to go to fulfill his potential, but that was the first time I felt like this was his team. Thats such a good sign. This season is about building week to week. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Stop recruiting upper middle class white guys unless they demonstrate incredible physicality. Who is the last guy from this demographic that was physical and hungry?

Paging Ethan Burke and Michael Taaffe.  Burke and Taaffe, please report immediately to the Office Opposing Racist Recruiting so we can prove that aggression and strength are not traits tied exclusively to race or class. 

Let this be a reminder to us all: never go full SEC.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, bejezuz said:

Paging Ethan Burke and Michael Taaffe.  Burke and Taaffe, please report immediately to the Office Opposing Racist Recruiting so we can prove that aggression and strength are not traits tied exclusively to race or class. 

Let this be a reminder to us all: never go full SEC.  

You people should really read the thread the post and context of the surrounding post when i made it about roster construction and especially the last part you didn’t include in your replay that suggest that it’s probably a better post in the OL thread. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I'm calling "The Malevolent Genies" for my punk cover band.  We'll be playing nothing but Sex Pistols, Dead Kennedys, The Stooges, Bad Brains, Minor Threat, Minutemen and Husker Du.  No Ramones, their release times were too short.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...