Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

Surely the guy is fired right

Worst FBS team, UCLA or VA Tech?

Okie lite belongs in the convo for sure. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

2, 3, 1, x, x, x

1,3,2

Left has a mischievous grin- she'll do some butt stuff.

Right has tigols, obviously fake, but I'm not gonna dock points for that in this age bracket.

Center, I can't really get a read on her rack but she'd get it too.

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
On 9/13/2025 at 2:59 PM, BurntEyes said:

 

This. 

UCLA lost to a state agricultural college. One from New Mexico. At home. When heavily favored. By 25 points. And it wasn't that close.

It was absolutely worse. 

Think of Texas losing by 25 at DKR to West Virginia Agricultural College of Meth and Weed. 

they lost to UNM

New Mexico State (the Aggies) is the land grant in New Mexico......losing to them would have sucked worse though 

Edited by ButtFumble
  • Drool 1
Posted
2 hours ago, satyanash said:

 

Mandel was a Chip Kelly mouthpiece and is still running PR for him. This isn’t completely inaccurate, but UCLA is not an impossible job. Mora was pulling classes around the Top 10 and attendance was decent in the early 2010s. In the rev share era, it should be a mid-tier B10 job. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Jimmy Two Times said:

Mandel was a Chip Kelly mouthpiece and is still running PR for him. This isn’t completely inaccurate, but UCLA is not an impossible job. Mora was pulling classes around the Top 10 and attendance was decent in the early 2010s. In the rev share era, it should be a mid-tier B10 job. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Jimmy Two Times said:

Mandel was a Chip Kelly mouthpiece and is still running PR for him. This isn’t completely inaccurate, but UCLA is not an impossible job. Mora was pulling classes around the Top 10 and attendance was decent in the early 2010s. In the rev share era, it should be a mid-tier B10 job. 

You can’t look back before NIL to try and rationalize a program. If they don’t have the NIL or desire to push big time NIL they won’t be successful in the Big 10 

Posted
12 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

You can’t look back before NIL to try and rationalize a program. If they don’t have the NIL or desire to push big time NIL they won’t be successful in the Big 10 

That’s why I clarified that UCLA can be competitive in the rev share era. The donor base isn’t actually that bad, it’s just been completely disengaged by Kelly and Foster. They’ve fundraised well for facilities in the past and have plenty of basketball NIL. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

.6b3e620203d938ccb33342667f57bd2d.jpg

As a Berkeley grad, I'm no defender of UCLA, but if I were to pin the Pac 12's demise on any school, it's USC, and in reality it's just Larry Scott. UCLA always felt like they were just along for the ride in the B1G move. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, LTbear said:

As a Berkeley grad, I'm no defender of UCLA, but if I were to pin the Pac 12's demise on any school, it's USC, and in reality it's just Larry Scott. UCLA always felt like they were just along for the ride in the B1G move. 

Larry Scott : Bob Bowlsby
USC : Texas
UCLA : OU

Posted
16 hours ago, satyanash said:

 

UCLA has money, it's just getting their deep pockets to part with it.

Their bag men supported hoops in the past. It's a hard sell, but the people they've got in place now don't give a shit.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...